SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A federal judge said Thursday that the Trump administration's interpretation of what qualifies as "bona fide relationship" defies common sense. (Photo: allison_dc/flickr/cc)
Rejecting 'Cruel and Discriminatory Policy,' Federal Judge Deals Blow to Muslim Ban 2.0
Judge writes that "the Government's definition [of 'close familial relationship'] represents the antithesis of common sense."
Jul 14, 2017
A federal judge in Hawaii late Thursday dealt a blow to the Trump administration, weakening the so-called Muslim Ban 2.0.
That travel ban, aimed at people from six Muslim-majority countries, cannot be used to bar entry from grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins, said U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson. His ruling was in response to Hawaii's renewed attempt to challenge the ban's scope.
The U.S. Supreme Court, as Reuters explains,
last month said the ban could take effect, but that anyone from the six countries with a "bona fide relationship" to a U.S. person or entity could not be barred.
The Trump administration then interpreted that opinion to allow spouses, parents, children, fiances and siblings into the country, but barred grandparents and other family members, in a measure Trump called necessary to prevent attacks.
But Watson shot back against that interpretation. He wrote: "[T]he Government's definition represents the antithesis of common sense. Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents. Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government's definition excludes them. That simply cannot be."
Politico notes that Watson's order "also prohibited the administration from blocking refugees with a commitment from a resettlement agency in the U.S., a move that could revive the flow of refugee admissions this year."
According to Naureen Shah, Amnesty International USA senior director of campaigns, "This decision is another rejection of the Trump administration's cruel and discriminatory policy."
"It is welcome but temporary relief for the thousands of refugees and family members who remain uncertain of their future. They cannot wait for another drawn-out legal battle; Congress must step in now and end this cruel and discriminatory ban once and for all," Shah continued.
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) also welcomed the ruling.
"We are pleased that the U.S. District Court in Hawaii has further clarified the 'bona fide relationship' interpretation, recognizing how important grandparents or remaining extended families may be for refugees--as well as the resettlement agencies who prepare extensively for their smooth arrival," said Jennifer Sime, senior vice president of U.S. programs at the humanitarian organiation.
"The IRC is heartened, and continues to believe that this gold-standard resettlement program can and should continue to save lives while the administration conducts its review," she said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
A federal judge in Hawaii late Thursday dealt a blow to the Trump administration, weakening the so-called Muslim Ban 2.0.
That travel ban, aimed at people from six Muslim-majority countries, cannot be used to bar entry from grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins, said U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson. His ruling was in response to Hawaii's renewed attempt to challenge the ban's scope.
The U.S. Supreme Court, as Reuters explains,
last month said the ban could take effect, but that anyone from the six countries with a "bona fide relationship" to a U.S. person or entity could not be barred.
The Trump administration then interpreted that opinion to allow spouses, parents, children, fiances and siblings into the country, but barred grandparents and other family members, in a measure Trump called necessary to prevent attacks.
But Watson shot back against that interpretation. He wrote: "[T]he Government's definition represents the antithesis of common sense. Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents. Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government's definition excludes them. That simply cannot be."
Politico notes that Watson's order "also prohibited the administration from blocking refugees with a commitment from a resettlement agency in the U.S., a move that could revive the flow of refugee admissions this year."
According to Naureen Shah, Amnesty International USA senior director of campaigns, "This decision is another rejection of the Trump administration's cruel and discriminatory policy."
"It is welcome but temporary relief for the thousands of refugees and family members who remain uncertain of their future. They cannot wait for another drawn-out legal battle; Congress must step in now and end this cruel and discriminatory ban once and for all," Shah continued.
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) also welcomed the ruling.
"We are pleased that the U.S. District Court in Hawaii has further clarified the 'bona fide relationship' interpretation, recognizing how important grandparents or remaining extended families may be for refugees--as well as the resettlement agencies who prepare extensively for their smooth arrival," said Jennifer Sime, senior vice president of U.S. programs at the humanitarian organiation.
"The IRC is heartened, and continues to believe that this gold-standard resettlement program can and should continue to save lives while the administration conducts its review," she said.
A federal judge in Hawaii late Thursday dealt a blow to the Trump administration, weakening the so-called Muslim Ban 2.0.
That travel ban, aimed at people from six Muslim-majority countries, cannot be used to bar entry from grandparents, grandchildren, brothers-in-law, sisters-in-law, aunts, uncles, nieces, nephews, and cousins, said U.S. District Court Judge Derrick Watson. His ruling was in response to Hawaii's renewed attempt to challenge the ban's scope.
The U.S. Supreme Court, as Reuters explains,
last month said the ban could take effect, but that anyone from the six countries with a "bona fide relationship" to a U.S. person or entity could not be barred.
The Trump administration then interpreted that opinion to allow spouses, parents, children, fiances and siblings into the country, but barred grandparents and other family members, in a measure Trump called necessary to prevent attacks.
But Watson shot back against that interpretation. He wrote: "[T]he Government's definition represents the antithesis of common sense. Common sense, for instance, dictates that close family members be defined to include grandparents. Indeed, grandparents are the epitome of close family members. The Government's definition excludes them. That simply cannot be."
Politico notes that Watson's order "also prohibited the administration from blocking refugees with a commitment from a resettlement agency in the U.S., a move that could revive the flow of refugee admissions this year."
According to Naureen Shah, Amnesty International USA senior director of campaigns, "This decision is another rejection of the Trump administration's cruel and discriminatory policy."
"It is welcome but temporary relief for the thousands of refugees and family members who remain uncertain of their future. They cannot wait for another drawn-out legal battle; Congress must step in now and end this cruel and discriminatory ban once and for all," Shah continued.
The International Rescue Committee (IRC) also welcomed the ruling.
"We are pleased that the U.S. District Court in Hawaii has further clarified the 'bona fide relationship' interpretation, recognizing how important grandparents or remaining extended families may be for refugees--as well as the resettlement agencies who prepare extensively for their smooth arrival," said Jennifer Sime, senior vice president of U.S. programs at the humanitarian organiation.
"The IRC is heartened, and continues to believe that this gold-standard resettlement program can and should continue to save lives while the administration conducts its review," she said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.