SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Trump administration's recruitment of Prince and Feinberg "raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations," the New York Times notes. (Photo: Miller Center/Flickr/cc)
Two of President Donald Trump's closest aides have reportedly solicited advice from two wealthy private military contractors--Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire owner of DynCorp International--on how to proceed with the sixteen-year-long war in Afghanistan.
"That Erik 'Wage Holy War For Profit' Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story."
--Kate Aronoff, In These Times
According to the New York Times, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and senior advisor Jared Kushner "recruited" the contractors, who have made a hefty sum from perpetual conflict in the Middle East, "to devise alternatives to the Pentagon's plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan."
Following a meeting with Bannon and Kushner, Prince and Feinberg have "developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan," the Times notes.
"The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump's generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems," the Times reports. "But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations."
As Common Dreams reported last month, Prince penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he recommended a "viceroy approach" in Afghanistan that would rely heavily on private security forces.
Critics characterized Prince's proposals as tantamount to "colonialism" and argued they exude "sheer 19th century bloodlust and thirst for empire."
Following the Times reporting on Monday, commentators denounced the attempt to give credence to the ideas of war profiteers as "lunacy."
\u201cThis is lunacy; a real estate brat and a former film producer/right wing extremist are laying out military options? https://t.co/owkFVDuaB7\u201d— David Leopold (@David Leopold) 1499769653
\u201cThat Erik "Wage Holy War For Profit" Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story https://t.co/JCjvE768uv\u201d— Kate Aronoff (@Kate Aronoff) 1499744490
\u201cThis story of the Trumpers' military incoherence & corruption--featuring Erik Prince--shouldn't get lost in the din. https://t.co/BLEGE6Te1g\u201d— Joshua Holland (@Joshua Holland) 1499777610
\u201cI am shocked that a defense contractor thinks we should send more contractors into Afghanistan. https://t.co/OcMkepdZtb\u201d— Adam Smith (@Adam Smith) 1499777532
\u201cBannon & Kushner asked ***the Blackwater guy*** to pitch a plan to outsource the Afghan war to contractors. Unreal. https://t.co/7oOvEKqFcs\u201d— Eric Geller (@Eric Geller) 1499778003
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Two of President Donald Trump's closest aides have reportedly solicited advice from two wealthy private military contractors--Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire owner of DynCorp International--on how to proceed with the sixteen-year-long war in Afghanistan.
"That Erik 'Wage Holy War For Profit' Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story."
--Kate Aronoff, In These Times
According to the New York Times, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and senior advisor Jared Kushner "recruited" the contractors, who have made a hefty sum from perpetual conflict in the Middle East, "to devise alternatives to the Pentagon's plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan."
Following a meeting with Bannon and Kushner, Prince and Feinberg have "developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan," the Times notes.
"The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump's generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems," the Times reports. "But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations."
As Common Dreams reported last month, Prince penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he recommended a "viceroy approach" in Afghanistan that would rely heavily on private security forces.
Critics characterized Prince's proposals as tantamount to "colonialism" and argued they exude "sheer 19th century bloodlust and thirst for empire."
Following the Times reporting on Monday, commentators denounced the attempt to give credence to the ideas of war profiteers as "lunacy."
\u201cThis is lunacy; a real estate brat and a former film producer/right wing extremist are laying out military options? https://t.co/owkFVDuaB7\u201d— David Leopold (@David Leopold) 1499769653
\u201cThat Erik "Wage Holy War For Profit" Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story https://t.co/JCjvE768uv\u201d— Kate Aronoff (@Kate Aronoff) 1499744490
\u201cThis story of the Trumpers' military incoherence & corruption--featuring Erik Prince--shouldn't get lost in the din. https://t.co/BLEGE6Te1g\u201d— Joshua Holland (@Joshua Holland) 1499777610
\u201cI am shocked that a defense contractor thinks we should send more contractors into Afghanistan. https://t.co/OcMkepdZtb\u201d— Adam Smith (@Adam Smith) 1499777532
\u201cBannon & Kushner asked ***the Blackwater guy*** to pitch a plan to outsource the Afghan war to contractors. Unreal. https://t.co/7oOvEKqFcs\u201d— Eric Geller (@Eric Geller) 1499778003
Two of President Donald Trump's closest aides have reportedly solicited advice from two wealthy private military contractors--Erik Prince, founder of Blackwater, and Stephen Feinberg, the billionaire owner of DynCorp International--on how to proceed with the sixteen-year-long war in Afghanistan.
"That Erik 'Wage Holy War For Profit' Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story."
--Kate Aronoff, In These Times
According to the New York Times, White House Chief Strategist Steve Bannon and senior advisor Jared Kushner "recruited" the contractors, who have made a hefty sum from perpetual conflict in the Middle East, "to devise alternatives to the Pentagon's plan to send thousands of additional troops to Afghanistan."
Following a meeting with Bannon and Kushner, Prince and Feinberg have "developed proposals to rely on contractors instead of American troops in Afghanistan," the Times notes.
"The highly unusual meeting dramatizes the divide between Mr. Trump's generals and his political staff over Afghanistan, the lengths to which his aides will go to give their boss more options for dealing with it and the readiness of this White House to turn to business people for help with diplomatic and military problems," the Times reports. "But it also raises a host of ethical issues, not least that both men could profit from their recommendations."
As Common Dreams reported last month, Prince penned an op-ed in the Wall Street Journal in which he recommended a "viceroy approach" in Afghanistan that would rely heavily on private security forces.
Critics characterized Prince's proposals as tantamount to "colonialism" and argued they exude "sheer 19th century bloodlust and thirst for empire."
Following the Times reporting on Monday, commentators denounced the attempt to give credence to the ideas of war profiteers as "lunacy."
\u201cThis is lunacy; a real estate brat and a former film producer/right wing extremist are laying out military options? https://t.co/owkFVDuaB7\u201d— David Leopold (@David Leopold) 1499769653
\u201cThat Erik "Wage Holy War For Profit" Prince is talking to cabinet members should but probably won't be a huge story https://t.co/JCjvE768uv\u201d— Kate Aronoff (@Kate Aronoff) 1499744490
\u201cThis story of the Trumpers' military incoherence & corruption--featuring Erik Prince--shouldn't get lost in the din. https://t.co/BLEGE6Te1g\u201d— Joshua Holland (@Joshua Holland) 1499777610
\u201cI am shocked that a defense contractor thinks we should send more contractors into Afghanistan. https://t.co/OcMkepdZtb\u201d— Adam Smith (@Adam Smith) 1499777532
\u201cBannon & Kushner asked ***the Blackwater guy*** to pitch a plan to outsource the Afghan war to contractors. Unreal. https://t.co/7oOvEKqFcs\u201d— Eric Geller (@Eric Geller) 1499778003