SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," ACLU's lawsuit claims. (Photo: Ted Eytan/flickr/cc)
ACLU Sues DC Police for Attempts to 'Chill' Dissent on Inauguration Day
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters
Jun 21, 2017
Amid a nationwide crackdown on dissent by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department alleging officers violated the rights of protestors and journalists attending Trump's inauguration in January.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital."
--Scott Michelman, ACLU senior attorney
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters.
"In the course of the roundup and subsequent processing of demonstrators," the organization claims, "police held detainees for hours without food, water, or access to toilets; handcuffed detainees so tightly as to cause injury or loss of feeling; and subjected some detainees to manual rectal probing. Much of MPD's misconduct has been independently documented by the District of Columbia's Office of Police Complaints."
While more than 200 people were arrested during the inauguration protests, this particular lawsuit was filed on behalf of "two individuals who came to the District to express their views concerning the inauguration, a photojournalist who covered the demonstrations, and a legal observer who was present at the scene."
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," the suit alleges, painting a broader picture of what the plaintiffs argue amounts to excessive use of force.
At a press conference on Wednesday, photojournalist Shay Horse, a plaintiff in the suit, said he was taking photos of the inauguration protests when he was pepper sprayed by police, Buzzfeed's Zoe Tillman reported.
Tillman further reports how Judah Ariel, a legal observer, said he observed a police officer "indiscriminately spraying pepper spray without warning at a crowd of people who were not threatening police, comparing it to Al Pacino with a machine gun in the movie 'Scarface.'"
"It probably couldn't have turned out much worse," Ariel told the Washington Post. "It also shows that it's important to have people out there observing and documenting any abuses and violations of people's rights."
Scott Michelman, a senior attorney for the ACLU in D.C., argued the mass arrests were not the accidental result of a chaotic situation, but rather a coordinated effort to forcefully quell dissent.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital," Michelman told the Post.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Amid a nationwide crackdown on dissent by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department alleging officers violated the rights of protestors and journalists attending Trump's inauguration in January.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital."
--Scott Michelman, ACLU senior attorney
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters.
"In the course of the roundup and subsequent processing of demonstrators," the organization claims, "police held detainees for hours without food, water, or access to toilets; handcuffed detainees so tightly as to cause injury or loss of feeling; and subjected some detainees to manual rectal probing. Much of MPD's misconduct has been independently documented by the District of Columbia's Office of Police Complaints."
While more than 200 people were arrested during the inauguration protests, this particular lawsuit was filed on behalf of "two individuals who came to the District to express their views concerning the inauguration, a photojournalist who covered the demonstrations, and a legal observer who was present at the scene."
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," the suit alleges, painting a broader picture of what the plaintiffs argue amounts to excessive use of force.
At a press conference on Wednesday, photojournalist Shay Horse, a plaintiff in the suit, said he was taking photos of the inauguration protests when he was pepper sprayed by police, Buzzfeed's Zoe Tillman reported.
Tillman further reports how Judah Ariel, a legal observer, said he observed a police officer "indiscriminately spraying pepper spray without warning at a crowd of people who were not threatening police, comparing it to Al Pacino with a machine gun in the movie 'Scarface.'"
"It probably couldn't have turned out much worse," Ariel told the Washington Post. "It also shows that it's important to have people out there observing and documenting any abuses and violations of people's rights."
Scott Michelman, a senior attorney for the ACLU in D.C., argued the mass arrests were not the accidental result of a chaotic situation, but rather a coordinated effort to forcefully quell dissent.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital," Michelman told the Post.
Amid a nationwide crackdown on dissent by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department alleging officers violated the rights of protestors and journalists attending Trump's inauguration in January.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital."
--Scott Michelman, ACLU senior attorney
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters.
"In the course of the roundup and subsequent processing of demonstrators," the organization claims, "police held detainees for hours without food, water, or access to toilets; handcuffed detainees so tightly as to cause injury or loss of feeling; and subjected some detainees to manual rectal probing. Much of MPD's misconduct has been independently documented by the District of Columbia's Office of Police Complaints."
While more than 200 people were arrested during the inauguration protests, this particular lawsuit was filed on behalf of "two individuals who came to the District to express their views concerning the inauguration, a photojournalist who covered the demonstrations, and a legal observer who was present at the scene."
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," the suit alleges, painting a broader picture of what the plaintiffs argue amounts to excessive use of force.
At a press conference on Wednesday, photojournalist Shay Horse, a plaintiff in the suit, said he was taking photos of the inauguration protests when he was pepper sprayed by police, Buzzfeed's Zoe Tillman reported.
Tillman further reports how Judah Ariel, a legal observer, said he observed a police officer "indiscriminately spraying pepper spray without warning at a crowd of people who were not threatening police, comparing it to Al Pacino with a machine gun in the movie 'Scarface.'"
"It probably couldn't have turned out much worse," Ariel told the Washington Post. "It also shows that it's important to have people out there observing and documenting any abuses and violations of people's rights."
Scott Michelman, a senior attorney for the ACLU in D.C., argued the mass arrests were not the accidental result of a chaotic situation, but rather a coordinated effort to forcefully quell dissent.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital," Michelman told the Post.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.
To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.
News & Opinion
Trending
Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit
Privacy Policy