"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," ACLU's lawsuit claims. (Photo: Ted Eytan/flickr/cc)
ACLU Sues DC Police for Attempts to 'Chill' Dissent on Inauguration Day
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters
Amid a nationwide crackdown on dissent by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department alleging officers violated the rights of protestors and journalists attending Trump's inauguration in January.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital."
--Scott Michelman, ACLU senior attorney
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters.
"In the course of the roundup and subsequent processing of demonstrators," the organization claims, "police held detainees for hours without food, water, or access to toilets; handcuffed detainees so tightly as to cause injury or loss of feeling; and subjected some detainees to manual rectal probing. Much of MPD's misconduct has been independently documented by the District of Columbia's Office of Police Complaints."
While more than 200 people were arrested during the inauguration protests, this particular lawsuit was filed on behalf of "two individuals who came to the District to express their views concerning the inauguration, a photojournalist who covered the demonstrations, and a legal observer who was present at the scene."
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," the suit alleges, painting a broader picture of what the plaintiffs argue amounts to excessive use of force.
At a press conference on Wednesday, photojournalist Shay Horse, a plaintiff in the suit, said he was taking photos of the inauguration protests when he was pepper sprayed by police, Buzzfeed's Zoe Tillman reported.
Tillman further reports how Judah Ariel, a legal observer, said he observed a police officer "indiscriminately spraying pepper spray without warning at a crowd of people who were not threatening police, comparing it to Al Pacino with a machine gun in the movie 'Scarface.'"
"It probably couldn't have turned out much worse," Ariel told the Washington Post. "It also shows that it's important to have people out there observing and documenting any abuses and violations of people's rights."
Scott Michelman, a senior attorney for the ACLU in D.C., argued the mass arrests were not the accidental result of a chaotic situation, but rather a coordinated effort to forcefully quell dissent.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital," Michelman told the Post.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Amid a nationwide crackdown on dissent by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department alleging officers violated the rights of protestors and journalists attending Trump's inauguration in January.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital."
--Scott Michelman, ACLU senior attorney
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters.
"In the course of the roundup and subsequent processing of demonstrators," the organization claims, "police held detainees for hours without food, water, or access to toilets; handcuffed detainees so tightly as to cause injury or loss of feeling; and subjected some detainees to manual rectal probing. Much of MPD's misconduct has been independently documented by the District of Columbia's Office of Police Complaints."
While more than 200 people were arrested during the inauguration protests, this particular lawsuit was filed on behalf of "two individuals who came to the District to express their views concerning the inauguration, a photojournalist who covered the demonstrations, and a legal observer who was present at the scene."
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," the suit alleges, painting a broader picture of what the plaintiffs argue amounts to excessive use of force.
At a press conference on Wednesday, photojournalist Shay Horse, a plaintiff in the suit, said he was taking photos of the inauguration protests when he was pepper sprayed by police, Buzzfeed's Zoe Tillman reported.
Tillman further reports how Judah Ariel, a legal observer, said he observed a police officer "indiscriminately spraying pepper spray without warning at a crowd of people who were not threatening police, comparing it to Al Pacino with a machine gun in the movie 'Scarface.'"
"It probably couldn't have turned out much worse," Ariel told the Washington Post. "It also shows that it's important to have people out there observing and documenting any abuses and violations of people's rights."
Scott Michelman, a senior attorney for the ACLU in D.C., argued the mass arrests were not the accidental result of a chaotic situation, but rather a coordinated effort to forcefully quell dissent.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital," Michelman told the Post.
Amid a nationwide crackdown on dissent by President Donald Trump and the Republican Party, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) on Wednesday filed a lawsuit (pdf) against the District of Columbia Metropolitan Police Department alleging officers violated the rights of protestors and journalists attending Trump's inauguration in January.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital."
--Scott Michelman, ACLU senior attorney
The suit claims D.C. police unlawfully arrested peaceful demonstrators and indiscriminately deployed tear gas and flash-bang grenades against journalists, legal observers, and crowds of protesters.
"In the course of the roundup and subsequent processing of demonstrators," the organization claims, "police held detainees for hours without food, water, or access to toilets; handcuffed detainees so tightly as to cause injury or loss of feeling; and subjected some detainees to manual rectal probing. Much of MPD's misconduct has been independently documented by the District of Columbia's Office of Police Complaints."
While more than 200 people were arrested during the inauguration protests, this particular lawsuit was filed on behalf of "two individuals who came to the District to express their views concerning the inauguration, a photojournalist who covered the demonstrations, and a legal observer who was present at the scene."
"Pepper spray and tear gas were used against all plaintiffs without justification and without warning," the suit alleges, painting a broader picture of what the plaintiffs argue amounts to excessive use of force.
At a press conference on Wednesday, photojournalist Shay Horse, a plaintiff in the suit, said he was taking photos of the inauguration protests when he was pepper sprayed by police, Buzzfeed's Zoe Tillman reported.
Tillman further reports how Judah Ariel, a legal observer, said he observed a police officer "indiscriminately spraying pepper spray without warning at a crowd of people who were not threatening police, comparing it to Al Pacino with a machine gun in the movie 'Scarface.'"
"It probably couldn't have turned out much worse," Ariel told the Washington Post. "It also shows that it's important to have people out there observing and documenting any abuses and violations of people's rights."
Scott Michelman, a senior attorney for the ACLU in D.C., argued the mass arrests were not the accidental result of a chaotic situation, but rather a coordinated effort to forcefully quell dissent.
"It is clear to me that the Metropolitan police came out on Inauguration Day intent on teaching demonstrators a lesson and chilling political speech in the nation's capital," Michelman told the Post.