The Senate just voted to send arms to "country that has repeatedly used US weapons in attacks that likely constitute war crimes," wrote Alexandra Schmitt of Human Rights Watch (Photo: AP/Hani Mohammed)
'Shameful': Senate Votes to Further Arm Saudi Arabia as Yemen Suffers
Bipartisan opposition to the bill nonetheless sent a "strong message" to the Saudis—and to President Trump
The Senate voted on Tuesday to approve a widely criticized $500 million sale of precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia, narrowly beating back a bipartisan effort to block the deal.
"Voting for the weapons sale, these Senators showed that they value the war profiteers more than lives of Yemenis and more than US national security."
--Jodie Evans, CODEPINK
The final tally was 53-47 in favor of the sale, which is just part of a massive $100 billion arms package.
Among the sponsors of the resolution put forth to block the sale was Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who argued that despite the opposition's defeat, the effort nonetheless sent a "strong message" to Saudi Arabia.
\u201cMy resolution halting $500m of Saudi arms sale failed 47-53. But 20 more votes than similar resolution last fall. Strong message to Saudis.\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1497380991
"A bipartisan coalition of Senators just sent a major message to the Saudis," Murphy said in a statement. "Today's vote total would've been unthinkable not long ago, but Congress is finally taking notice that Saudi Arabia is using U.S. munitions to deliberately hit civilian targets inside Yemen."
Human rights groups echoed this sentiment while arguing that to continue to arm a persistent violator of human rights and funder of extremism is to be complicit in both.
In a statement released following the vote, Alexandra Schmitt of Human Rights Watch wrote, "Dozens of US Senators just sent a powerful message to Saudi Arabia: they--unlike President Donald Trump--want to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia, a country that has repeatedly used US weapons in attacks that likely constitute war crimes. Forty-seven senators voted to block a US$510 million weapons deal, meaning it was only three votes short of passing."
Jodie Evans, co-founder of the anti-war group CODEPINK, had a sharp message for those who voted for the deal.
"Voting for the weapons sale," Evans said, "these Senators showed that they value the war profiteers more than lives of Yemenis and more than US national security."
If lawmakers really cared about national security, she asked, "would they vote to arm the regime most responsible for the spread of the Wahhabist ideology that forms the underpinnings of terrorist groups from Al Qaeda to ISIS? Would they vote to arm the regime that has funded and supported these terrorist groups?"
Yemenis, the victims of U.S.-backed Saudi aggression, feel "abandoned and betrayed" by the continued arms flow, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Ali Mohammed Murshed, a 32-year-old delivery man from Sana'a, spoke to the Times and exemplified how repeated arms deals in the face of Yemeni suffering only fuels anti-American sentiment in the country.
"There is nothing in this world that I hate more than Americans," Murshed said.
"With all the arms they have given to Saudi Arabia, the Saudis have achieved nothing after more than two years but killing civilians and destroying infrastructure," he concluded.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Senate voted on Tuesday to approve a widely criticized $500 million sale of precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia, narrowly beating back a bipartisan effort to block the deal.
"Voting for the weapons sale, these Senators showed that they value the war profiteers more than lives of Yemenis and more than US national security."
--Jodie Evans, CODEPINK
The final tally was 53-47 in favor of the sale, which is just part of a massive $100 billion arms package.
Among the sponsors of the resolution put forth to block the sale was Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who argued that despite the opposition's defeat, the effort nonetheless sent a "strong message" to Saudi Arabia.
\u201cMy resolution halting $500m of Saudi arms sale failed 47-53. But 20 more votes than similar resolution last fall. Strong message to Saudis.\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1497380991
"A bipartisan coalition of Senators just sent a major message to the Saudis," Murphy said in a statement. "Today's vote total would've been unthinkable not long ago, but Congress is finally taking notice that Saudi Arabia is using U.S. munitions to deliberately hit civilian targets inside Yemen."
Human rights groups echoed this sentiment while arguing that to continue to arm a persistent violator of human rights and funder of extremism is to be complicit in both.
In a statement released following the vote, Alexandra Schmitt of Human Rights Watch wrote, "Dozens of US Senators just sent a powerful message to Saudi Arabia: they--unlike President Donald Trump--want to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia, a country that has repeatedly used US weapons in attacks that likely constitute war crimes. Forty-seven senators voted to block a US$510 million weapons deal, meaning it was only three votes short of passing."
Jodie Evans, co-founder of the anti-war group CODEPINK, had a sharp message for those who voted for the deal.
"Voting for the weapons sale," Evans said, "these Senators showed that they value the war profiteers more than lives of Yemenis and more than US national security."
If lawmakers really cared about national security, she asked, "would they vote to arm the regime most responsible for the spread of the Wahhabist ideology that forms the underpinnings of terrorist groups from Al Qaeda to ISIS? Would they vote to arm the regime that has funded and supported these terrorist groups?"
Yemenis, the victims of U.S.-backed Saudi aggression, feel "abandoned and betrayed" by the continued arms flow, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Ali Mohammed Murshed, a 32-year-old delivery man from Sana'a, spoke to the Times and exemplified how repeated arms deals in the face of Yemeni suffering only fuels anti-American sentiment in the country.
"There is nothing in this world that I hate more than Americans," Murshed said.
"With all the arms they have given to Saudi Arabia, the Saudis have achieved nothing after more than two years but killing civilians and destroying infrastructure," he concluded.
The Senate voted on Tuesday to approve a widely criticized $500 million sale of precision-guided munitions to Saudi Arabia, narrowly beating back a bipartisan effort to block the deal.
"Voting for the weapons sale, these Senators showed that they value the war profiteers more than lives of Yemenis and more than US national security."
--Jodie Evans, CODEPINK
The final tally was 53-47 in favor of the sale, which is just part of a massive $100 billion arms package.
Among the sponsors of the resolution put forth to block the sale was Sen. Chris Murphy (D-Conn.), who argued that despite the opposition's defeat, the effort nonetheless sent a "strong message" to Saudi Arabia.
\u201cMy resolution halting $500m of Saudi arms sale failed 47-53. But 20 more votes than similar resolution last fall. Strong message to Saudis.\u201d— Chris Murphy (@Chris Murphy) 1497380991
"A bipartisan coalition of Senators just sent a major message to the Saudis," Murphy said in a statement. "Today's vote total would've been unthinkable not long ago, but Congress is finally taking notice that Saudi Arabia is using U.S. munitions to deliberately hit civilian targets inside Yemen."
Human rights groups echoed this sentiment while arguing that to continue to arm a persistent violator of human rights and funder of extremism is to be complicit in both.
In a statement released following the vote, Alexandra Schmitt of Human Rights Watch wrote, "Dozens of US Senators just sent a powerful message to Saudi Arabia: they--unlike President Donald Trump--want to stop selling arms to Saudi Arabia, a country that has repeatedly used US weapons in attacks that likely constitute war crimes. Forty-seven senators voted to block a US$510 million weapons deal, meaning it was only three votes short of passing."
Jodie Evans, co-founder of the anti-war group CODEPINK, had a sharp message for those who voted for the deal.
"Voting for the weapons sale," Evans said, "these Senators showed that they value the war profiteers more than lives of Yemenis and more than US national security."
If lawmakers really cared about national security, she asked, "would they vote to arm the regime most responsible for the spread of the Wahhabist ideology that forms the underpinnings of terrorist groups from Al Qaeda to ISIS? Would they vote to arm the regime that has funded and supported these terrorist groups?"
Yemenis, the victims of U.S.-backed Saudi aggression, feel "abandoned and betrayed" by the continued arms flow, the Los Angeles Times reported.
Ali Mohammed Murshed, a 32-year-old delivery man from Sana'a, spoke to the Times and exemplified how repeated arms deals in the face of Yemeni suffering only fuels anti-American sentiment in the country.
"There is nothing in this world that I hate more than Americans," Murshed said.
"With all the arms they have given to Saudi Arabia, the Saudis have achieved nothing after more than two years but killing civilians and destroying infrastructure," he concluded.