SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said at rally in San Francisco. (Image: Liz Hafalia, The Chronicle)
Warren: Trump Climate Move a "Gift" to Right-Wing Donors, Not American Workers
In withdrawing from the climate pact, Trump caved to big money interests, Senator Warren argued
Jun 02, 2017
Adding to the massive wave of outrage sparked by President Donald Trump's "stupid and reckless" decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday denounced the move as a "big gift to Republican donors" at the 'Joyous Persistence' rally in San Francisco.
In response to critics like Warren and countless others, White House officials and Trump allies have attempted to defend the withdrawal by characterizing it as part of a broader plan to protect American jobs and spur economic growth.
"This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Warren, a leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who is widely viewed as a potential 2020 presidential contender, forcefully dismissed this reasoning as a trope perpetuated in service of the donor class.
"[T]he Republicans have been framing this for a long time, jobs versus the environment," she said. "It is not. This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
For weeks, Trump was lobbied by a coalition consisting of, among others, his daughter Ivanka, Pope Francis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all of whom urged him to stick with the international community by firmly committing to the climate pact. In the end, however, it was the "big oil darlings" who won out, as the Guardian put it on Thursday.
The 22 Republican senators who signed a letter in May urging Trump to withdraw from the agreement received "a total of $10,694,284" in donations from oil, gas, and coal interests "over the past three election cycles," the Guardian added.
But, as some commentators pointed out, one did not need to look far to determine who would benefit from Trump's decision to side with big money over the climate. Attending Trump's "fact-free speech" in the Rose Garden of the White House was Thomas Pyle, the president of the American Energy Alliance. The fossil fuel industry group, as Politico reported, "has received some of its past funding from billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch."
For Warren, this is an indication that Trump's assault on the environment is part of a larger attempt to undermine the fundamental tenets of democracy. Trump's decision, Warren said, is "symptomatic of what's wrong" with American politics. Corporate cash, she added, "slithers through Washington like a snake."
In closing, the Massachusetts senator told the crowd gathered in the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre to resist the administration and to not treat politics as "something that just happens every four years."
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Adding to the massive wave of outrage sparked by President Donald Trump's "stupid and reckless" decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday denounced the move as a "big gift to Republican donors" at the 'Joyous Persistence' rally in San Francisco.
In response to critics like Warren and countless others, White House officials and Trump allies have attempted to defend the withdrawal by characterizing it as part of a broader plan to protect American jobs and spur economic growth.
"This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Warren, a leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who is widely viewed as a potential 2020 presidential contender, forcefully dismissed this reasoning as a trope perpetuated in service of the donor class.
"[T]he Republicans have been framing this for a long time, jobs versus the environment," she said. "It is not. This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
For weeks, Trump was lobbied by a coalition consisting of, among others, his daughter Ivanka, Pope Francis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all of whom urged him to stick with the international community by firmly committing to the climate pact. In the end, however, it was the "big oil darlings" who won out, as the Guardian put it on Thursday.
The 22 Republican senators who signed a letter in May urging Trump to withdraw from the agreement received "a total of $10,694,284" in donations from oil, gas, and coal interests "over the past three election cycles," the Guardian added.
But, as some commentators pointed out, one did not need to look far to determine who would benefit from Trump's decision to side with big money over the climate. Attending Trump's "fact-free speech" in the Rose Garden of the White House was Thomas Pyle, the president of the American Energy Alliance. The fossil fuel industry group, as Politico reported, "has received some of its past funding from billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch."
For Warren, this is an indication that Trump's assault on the environment is part of a larger attempt to undermine the fundamental tenets of democracy. Trump's decision, Warren said, is "symptomatic of what's wrong" with American politics. Corporate cash, she added, "slithers through Washington like a snake."
In closing, the Massachusetts senator told the crowd gathered in the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre to resist the administration and to not treat politics as "something that just happens every four years."
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said.
Adding to the massive wave of outrage sparked by President Donald Trump's "stupid and reckless" decision to withdraw from the Paris climate accord, Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) on Thursday denounced the move as a "big gift to Republican donors" at the 'Joyous Persistence' rally in San Francisco.
In response to critics like Warren and countless others, White House officials and Trump allies have attempted to defend the withdrawal by characterizing it as part of a broader plan to protect American jobs and spur economic growth.
"This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
--Sen. Elizabeth Warren
Warren, a leader of the progressive wing of the Democratic Party who is widely viewed as a potential 2020 presidential contender, forcefully dismissed this reasoning as a trope perpetuated in service of the donor class.
"[T]he Republicans have been framing this for a long time, jobs versus the environment," she said. "It is not. This is really about big donors to the Republican party."
For weeks, Trump was lobbied by a coalition consisting of, among others, his daughter Ivanka, Pope Francis, and Secretary of State Rex Tillerson, all of whom urged him to stick with the international community by firmly committing to the climate pact. In the end, however, it was the "big oil darlings" who won out, as the Guardian put it on Thursday.
The 22 Republican senators who signed a letter in May urging Trump to withdraw from the agreement received "a total of $10,694,284" in donations from oil, gas, and coal interests "over the past three election cycles," the Guardian added.
But, as some commentators pointed out, one did not need to look far to determine who would benefit from Trump's decision to side with big money over the climate. Attending Trump's "fact-free speech" in the Rose Garden of the White House was Thomas Pyle, the president of the American Energy Alliance. The fossil fuel industry group, as Politico reported, "has received some of its past funding from billionaire industrialists Charles and David Koch."
For Warren, this is an indication that Trump's assault on the environment is part of a larger attempt to undermine the fundamental tenets of democracy. Trump's decision, Warren said, is "symptomatic of what's wrong" with American politics. Corporate cash, she added, "slithers through Washington like a snake."
In closing, the Massachusetts senator told the crowd gathered in the Palace of Fine Arts Theatre to resist the administration and to not treat politics as "something that just happens every four years."
"We've got to be fighting every day," Warren said.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.