

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The Trump administration is attempting to squash an ethics inquiry into former lobbyists now working for government, according to the New York Times.
Despite signing an executive order in January prohibiting former lobbyists, industry lawyers, and consultants who are hired as political appointees from working for two years on issues involving former employers or clients (weakening the Obama-era version of the restriction), President Donald Trump has stacked his administration with such employees, presumably by granting waivers to the rules. Trump's order also made it so that sharing such waivers is no longer required.
In late April, Office of Government Ethics (OGE) head Walter Shaub, "in an effort to find out just how widespread such waivers have become, asked every federal agency and the White House to give him a copy by June 1 of every waiver it had issued," the Times reported Monday, adding that Shaub "intends to make the documents public."
He may not have the chance to do so.
Times reporter Eric Lipton writes that Trump appointee Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote to Shaub last week asking him to withdraw the request. "This data call appears to raise legal questions regarding the scope of OGE's authorities," said the letter, which the Times obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. It continued, "I therefore request that you stay the data call until these questions are resolved."
Lipton described the move as "highly unusual," while Shaub himself told the Times: "It is an extraordinary thing. I have never seen anything like it."
Former White House ethics lawyer Norman Eisen, meanwhile, said to the Times that the administration's response was "yet another demonstration of disrespect for the rule of law and for ethics and transparency coming from the White House."
Added Paul S. Ryan, vice president of litigation and policy for the watchdog group Common Cause: "This is the latest example in a long line of troubling moves by the Trump administration to conduct the business of government in secret. Just the ethical transgressions from members of this administration that we know about to date are unprecedented. That pattern of behavior makes it even more vital that this administration be transparent to We the People that President Trump was elected to serve."
"'Trust us' is not a sufficient answer from any White House, particularly the Trump White House," said Ryan.
Shaub reportedly told federal government ethics officers on Thursday that "he had the clear authority to make such a request and that they were still obligated under federal law to provide the requested information," Lipton reports. However, to enforce compliance would require cooperation from a reticent White House with which Shaub and the OGE have already tussled.
The OGE "is more or less dependent on the good graces of the party that is in power," said Marilyn L. Glynn, who served as general counsel and acting director of the agency during the George W. Bush administration. She called the Trump administration's latest ethical push-back "unprecedented and extremely troubling."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Trump administration is attempting to squash an ethics inquiry into former lobbyists now working for government, according to the New York Times.
Despite signing an executive order in January prohibiting former lobbyists, industry lawyers, and consultants who are hired as political appointees from working for two years on issues involving former employers or clients (weakening the Obama-era version of the restriction), President Donald Trump has stacked his administration with such employees, presumably by granting waivers to the rules. Trump's order also made it so that sharing such waivers is no longer required.
In late April, Office of Government Ethics (OGE) head Walter Shaub, "in an effort to find out just how widespread such waivers have become, asked every federal agency and the White House to give him a copy by June 1 of every waiver it had issued," the Times reported Monday, adding that Shaub "intends to make the documents public."
He may not have the chance to do so.
Times reporter Eric Lipton writes that Trump appointee Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote to Shaub last week asking him to withdraw the request. "This data call appears to raise legal questions regarding the scope of OGE's authorities," said the letter, which the Times obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. It continued, "I therefore request that you stay the data call until these questions are resolved."
Lipton described the move as "highly unusual," while Shaub himself told the Times: "It is an extraordinary thing. I have never seen anything like it."
Former White House ethics lawyer Norman Eisen, meanwhile, said to the Times that the administration's response was "yet another demonstration of disrespect for the rule of law and for ethics and transparency coming from the White House."
Added Paul S. Ryan, vice president of litigation and policy for the watchdog group Common Cause: "This is the latest example in a long line of troubling moves by the Trump administration to conduct the business of government in secret. Just the ethical transgressions from members of this administration that we know about to date are unprecedented. That pattern of behavior makes it even more vital that this administration be transparent to We the People that President Trump was elected to serve."
"'Trust us' is not a sufficient answer from any White House, particularly the Trump White House," said Ryan.
Shaub reportedly told federal government ethics officers on Thursday that "he had the clear authority to make such a request and that they were still obligated under federal law to provide the requested information," Lipton reports. However, to enforce compliance would require cooperation from a reticent White House with which Shaub and the OGE have already tussled.
The OGE "is more or less dependent on the good graces of the party that is in power," said Marilyn L. Glynn, who served as general counsel and acting director of the agency during the George W. Bush administration. She called the Trump administration's latest ethical push-back "unprecedented and extremely troubling."
The Trump administration is attempting to squash an ethics inquiry into former lobbyists now working for government, according to the New York Times.
Despite signing an executive order in January prohibiting former lobbyists, industry lawyers, and consultants who are hired as political appointees from working for two years on issues involving former employers or clients (weakening the Obama-era version of the restriction), President Donald Trump has stacked his administration with such employees, presumably by granting waivers to the rules. Trump's order also made it so that sharing such waivers is no longer required.
In late April, Office of Government Ethics (OGE) head Walter Shaub, "in an effort to find out just how widespread such waivers have become, asked every federal agency and the White House to give him a copy by June 1 of every waiver it had issued," the Times reported Monday, adding that Shaub "intends to make the documents public."
He may not have the chance to do so.
Times reporter Eric Lipton writes that Trump appointee Mick Mulvaney, director of the Office of Management and Budget, wrote to Shaub last week asking him to withdraw the request. "This data call appears to raise legal questions regarding the scope of OGE's authorities," said the letter, which the Times obtained through a Freedom of Information Act request. It continued, "I therefore request that you stay the data call until these questions are resolved."
Lipton described the move as "highly unusual," while Shaub himself told the Times: "It is an extraordinary thing. I have never seen anything like it."
Former White House ethics lawyer Norman Eisen, meanwhile, said to the Times that the administration's response was "yet another demonstration of disrespect for the rule of law and for ethics and transparency coming from the White House."
Added Paul S. Ryan, vice president of litigation and policy for the watchdog group Common Cause: "This is the latest example in a long line of troubling moves by the Trump administration to conduct the business of government in secret. Just the ethical transgressions from members of this administration that we know about to date are unprecedented. That pattern of behavior makes it even more vital that this administration be transparent to We the People that President Trump was elected to serve."
"'Trust us' is not a sufficient answer from any White House, particularly the Trump White House," said Ryan.
Shaub reportedly told federal government ethics officers on Thursday that "he had the clear authority to make such a request and that they were still obligated under federal law to provide the requested information," Lipton reports. However, to enforce compliance would require cooperation from a reticent White House with which Shaub and the OGE have already tussled.
The OGE "is more or less dependent on the good graces of the party that is in power," said Marilyn L. Glynn, who served as general counsel and acting director of the agency during the George W. Bush administration. She called the Trump administration's latest ethical push-back "unprecedented and extremely troubling."