The affected countries are Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates. (Photo: Woodys Aeroimages/flickr/cc)
Mar 21, 2017
Criticism abounded Tuesday after the U.S. government announced a surprise ban on any electronics "larger than a cell phone" on flights from eight Muslim-majority countries--Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
The U.K. is reportedly set to announce the same move Tuesday.
"From a technological perspective, nothing has changed between the last dozen years and today. That is, there are no new technological breakthroughs that make this threat any more serious today," Bruce Schneier, a security technologist, told the Guardian. "And there is certainly nothing technological that would limit this newfound threat to a handful of Middle Eastern airlines."
The 10 airports affected are Queen Alia International Airport (AMM), Cairo International Airport (CAI), Ataturk International Airport (IST), King Abdulaziz International Airport (JED), King Khalid International Airport (RUH), Kuwait International Airport (KWI), Mohammed V International Airport (CMN), Hamad International Airport (DOH), Dubai International Airport (DXB), and Abu Dhabi International Airport (AUH).
Officials gave airlines 96 hours to comply with the restrictions or risk losing their authorization to operate in the U.S., carriers said.
Under the restrictions, set to take effect Tuesday, travelers would have to stow any personal electronic devices larger than a cell phone or smart phone in their checked baggage.
Senior U.S. administration officials said late Monday that the new restrictions were prompted by "evaluated intelligence" that terrorists were smuggling explosives in "portable electronic devices," although they did not elaborate on what that meant.
But observers said the new rules were illogical and potentially discriminatory.
Nicholas Weaver, researcher at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California, Berkeley, added to the Guardian, "It's weird, because it doesn't match a conventional threat model."
"If you assume the attacker is interested in turning a laptop into a bomb, it would work just as well in the cargo hold," he said. "If you're worried about hacking, a cell phone is a computer."
Others noted that the government's basis for the new rules--claiming security threats--seems incongruous with its other recent travel restrictions.
"It is strange that this electronics ban is about security, but includes no countries on the #MuslimBan, which was also about security," tweeted Adrienne Mahsa, an editor at ThinkProgress.
\u201cIt is strange that this electronics ban is about security, but includes no countries on the #MuslimBan, which was also about security.\u201d— Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani (@Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani) 1490101764
Likewise, wrote Zach Whittaker, security editor at ZDNet and CBS News:
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Criticism abounded Tuesday after the U.S. government announced a surprise ban on any electronics "larger than a cell phone" on flights from eight Muslim-majority countries--Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
The U.K. is reportedly set to announce the same move Tuesday.
"From a technological perspective, nothing has changed between the last dozen years and today. That is, there are no new technological breakthroughs that make this threat any more serious today," Bruce Schneier, a security technologist, told the Guardian. "And there is certainly nothing technological that would limit this newfound threat to a handful of Middle Eastern airlines."
The 10 airports affected are Queen Alia International Airport (AMM), Cairo International Airport (CAI), Ataturk International Airport (IST), King Abdulaziz International Airport (JED), King Khalid International Airport (RUH), Kuwait International Airport (KWI), Mohammed V International Airport (CMN), Hamad International Airport (DOH), Dubai International Airport (DXB), and Abu Dhabi International Airport (AUH).
Officials gave airlines 96 hours to comply with the restrictions or risk losing their authorization to operate in the U.S., carriers said.
Under the restrictions, set to take effect Tuesday, travelers would have to stow any personal electronic devices larger than a cell phone or smart phone in their checked baggage.
Senior U.S. administration officials said late Monday that the new restrictions were prompted by "evaluated intelligence" that terrorists were smuggling explosives in "portable electronic devices," although they did not elaborate on what that meant.
But observers said the new rules were illogical and potentially discriminatory.
Nicholas Weaver, researcher at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California, Berkeley, added to the Guardian, "It's weird, because it doesn't match a conventional threat model."
"If you assume the attacker is interested in turning a laptop into a bomb, it would work just as well in the cargo hold," he said. "If you're worried about hacking, a cell phone is a computer."
Others noted that the government's basis for the new rules--claiming security threats--seems incongruous with its other recent travel restrictions.
"It is strange that this electronics ban is about security, but includes no countries on the #MuslimBan, which was also about security," tweeted Adrienne Mahsa, an editor at ThinkProgress.
\u201cIt is strange that this electronics ban is about security, but includes no countries on the #MuslimBan, which was also about security.\u201d— Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani (@Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani) 1490101764
Likewise, wrote Zach Whittaker, security editor at ZDNet and CBS News:
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Criticism abounded Tuesday after the U.S. government announced a surprise ban on any electronics "larger than a cell phone" on flights from eight Muslim-majority countries--Egypt, Jordan, Kuwait, Morocco, Qatar, Turkey, Saudi Arabia, and the United Arab Emirates.
The U.K. is reportedly set to announce the same move Tuesday.
"From a technological perspective, nothing has changed between the last dozen years and today. That is, there are no new technological breakthroughs that make this threat any more serious today," Bruce Schneier, a security technologist, told the Guardian. "And there is certainly nothing technological that would limit this newfound threat to a handful of Middle Eastern airlines."
The 10 airports affected are Queen Alia International Airport (AMM), Cairo International Airport (CAI), Ataturk International Airport (IST), King Abdulaziz International Airport (JED), King Khalid International Airport (RUH), Kuwait International Airport (KWI), Mohammed V International Airport (CMN), Hamad International Airport (DOH), Dubai International Airport (DXB), and Abu Dhabi International Airport (AUH).
Officials gave airlines 96 hours to comply with the restrictions or risk losing their authorization to operate in the U.S., carriers said.
Under the restrictions, set to take effect Tuesday, travelers would have to stow any personal electronic devices larger than a cell phone or smart phone in their checked baggage.
Senior U.S. administration officials said late Monday that the new restrictions were prompted by "evaluated intelligence" that terrorists were smuggling explosives in "portable electronic devices," although they did not elaborate on what that meant.
But observers said the new rules were illogical and potentially discriminatory.
Nicholas Weaver, researcher at the International Computer Science Institute at the University of California, Berkeley, added to the Guardian, "It's weird, because it doesn't match a conventional threat model."
"If you assume the attacker is interested in turning a laptop into a bomb, it would work just as well in the cargo hold," he said. "If you're worried about hacking, a cell phone is a computer."
Others noted that the government's basis for the new rules--claiming security threats--seems incongruous with its other recent travel restrictions.
"It is strange that this electronics ban is about security, but includes no countries on the #MuslimBan, which was also about security," tweeted Adrienne Mahsa, an editor at ThinkProgress.
\u201cIt is strange that this electronics ban is about security, but includes no countries on the #MuslimBan, which was also about security.\u201d— Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani (@Adrienne Mahsa Varkiani) 1490101764
Likewise, wrote Zach Whittaker, security editor at ZDNet and CBS News:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.