Skip to main content

Why are the billionaires always laughing?

Because they know the corporate media will never call bullshit on their bullshit.

Why are the billionaires laughing?

It’s easy to laugh when the corporate press treats you as a glorious success instead of the epitome of a broken social order. Billionaires laugh because they know the corporate media prefers to fawn over them rather than hold them to account.

Today, we ask you to support our nonprofit, independent journalism because we are not impressed by billionaires flying into space, their corporations despoiling our health and planet, or their vast fortunes safely concealed in tax havens across the globe. We are not laughing.

We are hard at work producing journalism for the common good. With our Fall Campaign underway, please support this mission today. We cannot do it without you.

Support Our Work -- Join the small group of generous readers who donate, keeping Common Dreams free for millions of people each year. Every donation—large or small—helps us bring you the news that matters.

President Donald Trump addresses a crowd of his supporters at a rally in Nashville, Tennessee just after a federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday issued a nationwide injunction against his proposed travel and immigration ban. (Photo: Twitpic/The Hill)

Judge Blocks Ban: "Human Decency" Over Trump's "Disgraceful" Discrimination

Citing establishment clause of the First Amendment, federal judge orders nationwide injunction against president's immigration ban

Common Dreams staff

Citing the establishment clause of the U.S. Constitution's First Amendment, which forbids unequal treatment based on religion, a federal judge in Hawaii on Wednesday evening issued a firm rebuke to President Trump by issuing a nationwide temporary injunction against the administration's second attempt at instituting a travel and immigration ban aimed at people from six Muslim majority countries.

"The Constitution has again put the brakes on President Trump's disgraceful and discriminatory ban. We are pleased but not surprised by this latest development and will continue working to ensure the Muslim ban never takes effect." —Omar Jadwat, ACLUThe ruling by U.S. District Judge Derrick Watson came just hours before the executive order signed by Trump was slated to go into effect (see below). Watson cited the harm the ban would inflict on the state and those directly impacted as reason to issue the sweeping injunction and said government lawyers defending the White House had failed to make their case that the executive order was not discriminatory.

"The illogic of the government's contentions is palpable," Watson wrote in his decision. "The notion that one can demonstrate animus toward any group of people only by targeting all of them at once is fundamentally flawed."

Watson explained that the travel ban proposed by Trump violates constitutional protections because "a reasonable, objective observer—enlightened by the specific historical context, contemporaneous public statements, and specific sequences of events leading to its issuance—would conclude that the Executive Order was issued with a purpose to disfavor a particular religion"—specifically Islam.

Read the full order issued by the court here.

Cecilia Wang, deputy legal director for the ACLU, celebrated the ruling:

Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU's Immigrants' Rights Project, joined his colleague in welcoming the news.

"The Constitution has again put the brakes on President Trump's disgraceful and discriminatory ban," Jadwat declared in a statement. "We are pleased but not surprised by this latest development and will continue working to ensure the Muslim ban never takes effect."

Nihad Awad, director of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR), expressed gratitude and called for the president to give up his flawed policy.

"We welcome this order as confirmation of the strength of our nation's system of checks and balances that prevents one branch of government from violating the Constitution or the rights of any vulnerable group," said Awad.  "We urge the Trump administration to scrap this Muslim ban entirely because it disrespects both the Constitution and America's longstanding tradition of religious freedom and inclusion."

Meanwhile, Trump himself addressed a rally of supporters in Nashville, Tennessee just after the news of Watson's ruling broke. As the Huffington Post reports:

Trump led a booing audience at a rally in Nashville Wednesday night in criticizing what he called the "flawed ruling." The president claimed he has the power to suspend immigration, and slammed what he called "unprecedented judicial overreach."

"This ruling makes us look weak, which by the way we no longer are," Trump complained. He added that he would "fight this terrible ruling" in the Supreme Court if necessary.

Watch Trump's remarks:


Immigrant rights advocates are ready to take action if courts don't rule before 12:01am Thursday, when President Donald Trump's revised travel ban is set to go into effect.

The reworked executive order, unveiled earlier this month, blocks entry to the United States to people from six majority-Muslim countries for 90 days and temporarily shuts down the country's refugee program. While its roll-out will almost certainly be less chaotic than the ban's first iteration, it has still been decried as "religious discrimination in the pretextual guise of national security," "unconstitutional," and likely to "do real damage to refugees and to America's reputation."

Judges heard arguments for and against the order in three separate courtrooms on Wednesday.

"In Maryland, U.S. District Judge Theodore Chuang—who was appointed by former President Barack Obama—said he would try to rule before the end of the day, but he made no promises that his ruling would apply nationwide or address the executive order in its entirety," as the Associated Press reported.

The case in Hawaii was underway on Wednesday afternoon.

And at 5:00pm Eastern Wednesday, a Seattle-based federal judge will hear a request to block the revised directive the president signed last week. As Politico explains, "[t]he private suit is separate from the one brought by Washington and other states, which prompted [Judge James] Robart's injunctions against the original travel ban order. The states have also filed a motion seeking to block Trump's new order, but the judge hasn't indicated yet whether he plans to hold a hearing on that request."

The Guardian reported Wednesday:

Should the federal courts decline to extend the current restraining order, and in turn allow the new ban to kick in at midnight, all eyes will swing to the main U.S. arrivals ports, notably Dulles [in Washington, D.C.], JFK in New York, LAX in Los Angeles and O'Hare in Chicago. When the first ban came into effect on 27 January, those airports saw scenes of extraordinary chaos and confusion, and become focal points of mass protests.

While provisions of the revised order suggest "similar scenes of pandemonium are much less likely to be witnessed at midnight Thursday," the Guardian noted that volunteers and activists are standing at the ready at major airports nationwide. 

Other groups are reportedly planning protests for Saturday. Human rights advocates Arjun Sethi, Deepa Iyer, and Linda Sarsour have also created the No Ban, No Wall, No Raids resource, with a list of upcoming resistance efforts as well as updates on litigation and guidance for immigrants.

Follow the developments under the hashtag #NoBanNoWallNoRaids:

Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Fatal Film Set Shooting Followed Outcry by Union Crew Members Over Safety Protocols

"When union members walk off a set about safety concerns, maybe 'hiring scabs' isn’t the solution you think it is."

Julia Conley ·

New Whistleblower Sparks Calls to 'Crack Down on Facebook and All Big Tech Companies'

Hours after another ex-employee filed a formal complaint, reporting broke on internal documents that show the tech giant's failure to address concerns about content related to the 2020 U.S. election.

Jessica Corbett ·

'Catastrophic and Irreparable Harm' to Wolves Averted as Wisconsin Judge Cancels Hunt

"We are heartened by this rare instance of reason and democracy prevailing in state wolf policy," said one conservation expert.

Brett Wilkins ·

West Virginia Constituents Decry 'Immorality' of Joe Manchin

"West Virginia has been locked into an economy that forces workers into low-wage jobs with no hope for advancement, and after decades of this our hope is dwindling," said one West Virginian. "The cuts that Sen. Manchin has negotiated into the agenda hurt our state."

Julia Conley ·

'Texans Deserved Better Than This': Supreme Court Leaves Abortion Ban in Place

The nation's high court set a date to hear a pair of legal challenges to the "horrific" restrictions.

Jessica Corbett ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.

Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo