SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The justices had been set to hear oral arguments on March 28 as to whether Gavin Grimm, a 17-year-old Virginia transgender boy, was legally allowed to use male facilities at his high school in Gloucester County, Virginia. (Photo: Getty)
US Supreme Court Punts on Transgender Rights, Sending Case Back to Lower Court
'So sad for Gavin and all those for whom he stands that SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now'
Mar 06, 2017
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Times put it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Times put it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Times put it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.