

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Times put it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Times put it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Times put it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."