
The justices had been set to hear oral arguments on March 28 as to whether Gavin Grimm, a 17-year-old Virginia transgender boy, was legally allowed to use male facilities at his high school in Gloucester County, Virginia. (Photo: Getty)
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
The justices had been set to hear oral arguments on March 28 as to whether Gavin Grimm, a 17-year-old Virginia transgender boy, was legally allowed to use male facilities at his high school in Gloucester County, Virginia. (Photo: Getty)
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Timesput it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Timesput it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Press reported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Timesput it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."