Mar 06, 2017
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Pressreported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Timesput it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Pressreported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Timesput it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
This post may be updated.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Monday punted on transgender rights, sending a critical case involving bathroom access at a Virginia high school back to a lower court.
In the wake of the Trump administration's revocation of Title IX protections for transgender students, "[t]he justices said Monday they have opted not to decide whether federal anti-discrimination law gives high school senior Gavin Grimm the right to use the boys' bathroom in his Virginia school," the Associated Pressreported.
They sent the case back to the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit to reconsider in light of the new guidance from the Trump administration.
The Fourth Circuit's earlier ruling, which was in Grimm's favor, is now wiped off the books.
ACLU deputy legal director Louise Melling said online:
\u201cSo sad for #Gavin and all those for whom he stands that #SCOTUS will not hear and resolve the case now. \ud83d\ude3f\u201d— Louise Melling (@Louise Melling) 1488811434
But ACLU staff attorney Chase Strangio, while calling the decision "wildly disappointing," vowed that the fight for transgender rights would continue:
\u201cThis means the case is delayed. But not the end of the road. We will fight on for Gavin and all trans kids. #StandWithGavin https://t.co/87gKfNX3Hj\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811096
\u201cSCOTUS was opportunity for one type of change but real change always happens in streets and in our hearts. So let's fight on.\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811623
\u201cMeaning of Title IX has no changed. Students still protected by Title IX and Constitution. We stay vigilant. #StandWithGavin\u201d— Chase Strangio (@Chase Strangio) 1488811938
"This is a detour, not the end of the road, and we'll continue to fight for Gavin and other transgender people to ensure that they are treated with the dignity and respect they deserve," added Joshua Block, senior staff attorney at the ACLU's LGBT Project and lead counsel for Grimm.
While Grimm's case would have been the Supreme Court's "first encounter with transgender rights," as the New York Timesput it, the paper also noted: "There are other cases on transgender rights in the pipeline, including a challenge to a North Carolina law that requires transgender people to use bathrooms in government buildings that correspond with the gender listed on their birth certificates. The law has drawn protests, boycotts and lawsuits."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.