Skip to main content

Common Dreams. Journalism funded by people, not corporations.

There has never been—and never will be—an advertisement on our site except for this one: without readers like you supporting our work, we wouldn't exist.

No corporate influence. No pay-wall. Independent news and opinion 365 days a year that is freely available to all and funded by those who support our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good.

Our mission is clear. Our model is simple. If you can, please support our Fall Campaign today.

Support Our Work -- No corporate influence. No pay-wall. Independent news funded by those who support our mission: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Please support our Fall Campaign today.

Rally in Washington DC against Trump's "Muslim Ban" policies organized by the Muslim American Women's Policy Forum. (Photo: Lorie Shaull/flickr/cc)

Trump Blasts Ruling of "So-Called Judge" as DHS Forced to Halt Muslim Ban

President Trump "is learning about separation of powers"—but the most frightening aspect for many is how much disdain he is showing for the concept

Jon Queally

Even as President Donald Trump lashed out at a federal court ruling issued Friday by labeling the federal judge who ordered it a "so-called judge," the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) on Saturday morning said it was suspending all enforcement of the controversial executive order on immigration that sparked outrage nationwide.

"President Trump’s attack on a federal judge is inexcusable. Sadly, we have seen a pattern of total disregard for the Constitution and the rule of law in the president’s behavior." —Caroline Fredrickson, American Constitution Society

Late Friday, U.S. District Judge James Robart in Seattle, Washington issued a nationwide restraining order against further enforcement of Trump's immigration order which legal analysts and immigration experts say specifically targeted Muslims from the seven specific nations named in the directive.

Omar Jadwat, director of the ACLU Immigrants' Rights Project, called the ruling "another stinging rejection of President Trump's unconstitutional Muslim ban."

But in his response to the ruling, Trump took to Twitter early Saturday morning to express his contempt.

 Just hours later, however, DHS announced it would adhere to Robart's order.

"In accordance with the judge's ruling," said DHS acting press secretary Gillian Christensen in a statement, "DHS has suspended any and all actions implementing the affected sections of the Executive Order entitled, 'Protecting the Nation from Foreign Terrorist Entry into the United States.' This includes actions to suspend passenger system rules that flag travelers for operational action subject to the Executive Order."

Also on Saturday, the U.S. State Department announced it has reversed the cancellation of visas which followed Trump's executive order. On Friday it was revealed that somewhere between 60,000 and 100,000 people from the seven nations named in the order had had their visas applications revoked or approved visas suspended.

"Those individuals with visas that were not physically cancelled may now travel if the visa is otherwise valid," the State Department said in a statement. According to NBC News, both State and DHS are working together to coordinate their activities in order to be sure all those who have the proper paperwork can now travel.

As NPR notes, airlines have been notified of the change and our now reportedly allowing those previously banned to travel.

But while rights advocates celebrated the move, Trump's contempt for being overruled by the court indicated that the legal batter over the Muslim ban is far from over.

"You couldn't write fiction more incredible and frightening," legal scholar Marjorie Cohn, former head of the National Lawyers Guild and currently serving as deputy secretary general of the International Association of Democratic Lawyers, told Common Dreams in an email.

In addition to the worrying and real-life harm being done to individuals and families impacted by Trump's travel ban, Cohn agreed with those arguing there are deeper issues at stake when a president shows such obvious disdain—in this case by personally and publicly denigrating a sitting U.S. judge by calling him "so-called"—for a legal system that depends on the federal court system to honestly and professionally adjudicate such matters.

"Donald Trump is learning about separation of powers," explained Cohn. "CEO's don't have courts telling them what they can and cannot do. There is no guarantee, however, that Trump will follow the commands of the federal district judge. Stay tuned."

Meanwhile,  Caroline Fredrickson, president of the American Constitution Society, said "President Trump’s attack on a federal judge is inexcusable. Sadly, we have seen a pattern of total disregard for the Constitution and the rule of law in the president’s behavior."

Fredrickson cited Trump's behavior during the 2016 presidential campaign where then-candidate Trump blasted a federal judge for his ethnic heritage. "Now," she said, President Trump "has attacked another federal judge for refusing to bow to political pressure, this after firing the acting Attorney General for the same thing when she refused to defend his discriminatory Muslim ban. We have separation of powers in this country, guaranteed by the Constitution. It is clear President Trump thinks he is above the law. This puts us in very dangerous territory."


Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

'The Facebook Papers' Spur More Calls to 'Break Them Up!'

Other critics are demanding a "full, independent, outside investigation" of the tech titan as whistleblower Frances Haugen testifies to the U.K. Parliament.

Jessica Corbett ·


Critics See Menendez Villainy Equal to Sinema's on Medicare Drug Pricing Fight

"It's discouraging to see Sen. Menendez is on the wrong side of this fight rather than leading the charge for more affordable, accessible healthcare for all."

Brett Wilkins ·


Humanity 'Way Off Track': WMO Says Atmospheric Carbon at Level Unseen in 3 Million Years

The new report has "a stark, scientific message for climate change negotiators at COP 26," said the head of the World Meteorological Organization.

Andrea Germanos ·


Any Lawmaker Involved in Planning Jan. 6 Insurrection 'Must Be Expelled,' Says AOC

Organizers of the deadly assault on the U.S. Capitol say that several congressional Republicans and White House officials helped plan former President Donald Trump's coup attempt.

Kenny Stancil ·


Profits Before People: 'The Facebook Papers' Expose Tech Giant Greed

"This industry is rotten at its core," said one critic, "and the clearest proof of that is what it's doing to our children."

Jon Queally ·

Support our work.

We are independent, non-profit, advertising-free and 100% reader supported.

Subscribe to our newsletter.

Quality journalism. Progressive values.
Direct to your inbox.

Subscribe to our Newsletter.


Common Dreams, Inc. Founded 1997. Registered 501(c3) Non-Profit | Privacy Policy
Common Dreams Logo