Published on

Theresa May Seeks to Pull UK from European Convention on Human Rights

Unelected prime minister to run in 2020 on bid to cut ties with outside judicial system and replace Human Rights Act with regressive rules

May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. (Photo: Number 10/flickr/cc)

British Prime Minister Theresa May will campaign to withdraw the United Kingdom from the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) in 2020, according to new reports.

May is expected to make the withdrawal a central mandate of her campaign to be formally voted into office in 2020. She became the unelected leader of the U.K. after former Prime Minister David Cameron stepped down in July following the Brexit referendum.

The new conservative government is also separately seeking to replace its current Human Rights Act—the U.K.'s implementation of the ECHR—with a new set of rules which critics say actually cracks down on free speech and peaceful protest.

While the convention is presided over by the European Court of Human Rights, May's proposed bill of rights would not be beholden to an outside judiciary.

We can't do it without you!

As the Independent explains, May "is looking to break off all relations with the court."


Never Miss a Beat.

Get our best delivered to your inbox.

"We urge the prime minister to spend her time trying to protect our rights, not do away with them," the British organization Liberty Human Rights said in response to reports on May's plans.

The group's director, Martha Spurrier, tweeted that the plans were "deeply irresponsible [and] frighteningly unprincipled," and put the prime minister on the wrong side of history.

Critics also warned that leaving the ECHR could be disastrous for the peace process in Northern Ireland, saying a withdrawal was akin to "playing with fire."

May initially floated the proposal while still serving as home secretary. At the time, shadow justice secretary Charles Falconer called the plans "so ignorant, so illiberal, so misguided...there has to be a source external to a government determining what human rights are."

"It will so damage the standing of the U.K., a country that above all plays by the rules and that is going around the world saying we should comply as a world with human rights," Falconer said in April. "This is so, so appalling."

This is the world we live in. This is the world we cover.

Because of people like you, another world is possible. There are many battles to be won, but we will battle them together—all of us. Common Dreams is not your normal news site. We don't survive on clicks. We don't want advertising dollars. We want the world to be a better place. But we can't do it alone. It doesn't work that way. We need you. If you can help today—because every gift of every size matters—please do. Without Your Support We Simply Don't Exist.

Please select a donation method:

Share This Article