SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Protesters gathered for a demonstration against the Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant in 2011. (Photo: Campaign for Nuclear Disarmament/flickr/cc)
The U.K. government agreed to limit what the operator and investors of the newly approved, controversial Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant would have to pay for radioactive waste storage, pushing the rest onto taxpayers, government documents reveal.
The government approved the plant, which will be operated by state-controlled French energy firm, EDF, with financial backing from China, last month.
In its reporting on Sunday, the Observer wrote that one document said there would be a "cap on the liability of the operator of the nuclear power station which would apply in a worst-case scenario."
"The U.K. government accepts that, in setting a cap, the residual risk, of the very worst-case scenarios where actual cost might exceed the cap, is being borne by the government," it stated.
The British paper adds: "Separate documents confirm that the cap also applies should the cost of decommissioning the reactor at the end of its life balloon."
The amount of the cap is unknown, the Observer reported.
Simon Bullock, senior climate campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said the project's approval last month was "blatantly the wrong decision" and called the plant "a project from a dying era, which would saddle Britons with eye-watering costs for decades, and radioactive waste for millenia."
"Renewables, smart grids, and energy storage are the fleet-footed mammals racing past this stumbling, inflexible nuclear dinosaur," he added.
The U.K. government's own spending watchdog said earlier this year that "Supporting early new nuclear projects could lead to higher costs in the short term than continuing to support wind and solar. The cost competitiveness of nuclear power is weakening as wind and solar become more established."
However, as the Financial Times wrote Friday, there are five more nuclear power stations planned for the U.K.
And Business and Energy Secretary Greg Clark told the House of Commons last month, "Hinkley Point C will inaugurate a new era of UK nuclear power."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The U.K. government agreed to limit what the operator and investors of the newly approved, controversial Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant would have to pay for radioactive waste storage, pushing the rest onto taxpayers, government documents reveal.
The government approved the plant, which will be operated by state-controlled French energy firm, EDF, with financial backing from China, last month.
In its reporting on Sunday, the Observer wrote that one document said there would be a "cap on the liability of the operator of the nuclear power station which would apply in a worst-case scenario."
"The U.K. government accepts that, in setting a cap, the residual risk, of the very worst-case scenarios where actual cost might exceed the cap, is being borne by the government," it stated.
The British paper adds: "Separate documents confirm that the cap also applies should the cost of decommissioning the reactor at the end of its life balloon."
The amount of the cap is unknown, the Observer reported.
Simon Bullock, senior climate campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said the project's approval last month was "blatantly the wrong decision" and called the plant "a project from a dying era, which would saddle Britons with eye-watering costs for decades, and radioactive waste for millenia."
"Renewables, smart grids, and energy storage are the fleet-footed mammals racing past this stumbling, inflexible nuclear dinosaur," he added.
The U.K. government's own spending watchdog said earlier this year that "Supporting early new nuclear projects could lead to higher costs in the short term than continuing to support wind and solar. The cost competitiveness of nuclear power is weakening as wind and solar become more established."
However, as the Financial Times wrote Friday, there are five more nuclear power stations planned for the U.K.
And Business and Energy Secretary Greg Clark told the House of Commons last month, "Hinkley Point C will inaugurate a new era of UK nuclear power."
The U.K. government agreed to limit what the operator and investors of the newly approved, controversial Hinkley Point C nuclear power plant would have to pay for radioactive waste storage, pushing the rest onto taxpayers, government documents reveal.
The government approved the plant, which will be operated by state-controlled French energy firm, EDF, with financial backing from China, last month.
In its reporting on Sunday, the Observer wrote that one document said there would be a "cap on the liability of the operator of the nuclear power station which would apply in a worst-case scenario."
"The U.K. government accepts that, in setting a cap, the residual risk, of the very worst-case scenarios where actual cost might exceed the cap, is being borne by the government," it stated.
The British paper adds: "Separate documents confirm that the cap also applies should the cost of decommissioning the reactor at the end of its life balloon."
The amount of the cap is unknown, the Observer reported.
Simon Bullock, senior climate campaigner for Friends of the Earth, said the project's approval last month was "blatantly the wrong decision" and called the plant "a project from a dying era, which would saddle Britons with eye-watering costs for decades, and radioactive waste for millenia."
"Renewables, smart grids, and energy storage are the fleet-footed mammals racing past this stumbling, inflexible nuclear dinosaur," he added.
The U.K. government's own spending watchdog said earlier this year that "Supporting early new nuclear projects could lead to higher costs in the short term than continuing to support wind and solar. The cost competitiveness of nuclear power is weakening as wind and solar become more established."
However, as the Financial Times wrote Friday, there are five more nuclear power stations planned for the U.K.
And Business and Energy Secretary Greg Clark told the House of Commons last month, "Hinkley Point C will inaugurate a new era of UK nuclear power."