SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The question posed to the population was: "Do you support the final accord for the end of the conflict and the construction of stable and lasting peace?" (Photo: AFP)
In an outcome described as "shocking," "painful," and "unspeakably sad," Colombian voters on Sunday rejected a landmark peace deal that would have ended a deadly 52-year war between the government and FARC guerillas.
Turnout was reportedly low, and the win was narrow, with the "No" vote leading by less than one percentage point, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
"Today will be remembered by history as the moment Colombia turned its back on what could have been the end of a war that for more than 50 years devastated millions of lives," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director for rights group Amnesty International. "Even though it was imperfect, the accord was a sure path to peace and justice."
According to TeleSUR:
The surprising results--which went against all exit polls that had the "Yes" vote winning easily--are showing that the areas most affected by the conflict have overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace. For example in the heavily affected area of Choco, with 95 percent of the vote counted, 79 percent voted "Yes." The Caribbean provinces have also voted "Yes."
In the capital of Bogota, the "Yes" vote won by 56 percent to 44 percent for the "No" vote.
[...] The "No" vote was led by former president Alvaro Uribe and big landowners who have run the country with impunity for decades. The fear-mongering campaign launched by these forces, with the support of right-wing media, proved too much for the forces for peace.
On Twitter, journalist and commentator Vijay Prashad also made note of the geographic breakdown:
\u201cImportant: the areas of Colombia that faced the worst of the civil war voted 'Yes' for peace. Areas least hit voted against the deal.\u201d— Vijay Prashad (@Vijay Prashad) 1475453115
CNN reported:
Likened to the fallout from the United Kingdom's "Brexit" referendum, the vote's unexpected failure has left the Colombian political classes reeling and unsure how to respond in order to save four years of hard negotiation with the Marxist militia.
Indeed, Reuters quoted one "No" voter who said: "We never thought this could happen. Now I just hope the government, the opposition, and the FARC come up with something intelligent that includes us all."
The BBC reported that "Most of those who voted 'no' said they thought the peace agreement was letting the rebels 'get away with murder'."
But others said that a campaign of fear won the day:
\u201c.@marioradio99 on Colombia's vote against FARC-government peace deal: \u201cFear was so palpable and so strong\u2026 It was almost inevitable\u201d\u201d— Democracy Now! (@Democracy Now!) 1475497804
\u201cRejection of #Colombia peace reaffirms an ancient truth of democracy: dramatic appeals to fear, nation, vengeance can win elections. #Trump\u201d— Allan Nairn (@Allan Nairn) 1475464695
\u201cFear, hatred and low turnout have cancelled years of negotiations and hope for peace and the future in Colombia. Lessons for November? https://t.co/dZrUauUK2S\u201d— Ana Dopico (@Ana Dopico) 1475447630
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, "[p]utting on a brave face after a major political defeat," as Reuters put it, said Monday that he "won't give up." He sent government negotiators back to Cuba on Monday morning to meet with FARC leaders, and "said he would meet with Colombia's opposition, led by former president and senator Alvaro Uribe, a mortal enemy of the FARC who has gained powerful new leverage over any potential attempt to rewrite the peace deal," the Washington Post reported.
FARC leader Rodrigo Londono (known as "Timochenko") also reiterated a commitment to peace, saying on Sunday: "The FARC reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future. To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph."
Both sides said the historic ceasefire, reached in June, would remain in place.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In an outcome described as "shocking," "painful," and "unspeakably sad," Colombian voters on Sunday rejected a landmark peace deal that would have ended a deadly 52-year war between the government and FARC guerillas.
Turnout was reportedly low, and the win was narrow, with the "No" vote leading by less than one percentage point, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
"Today will be remembered by history as the moment Colombia turned its back on what could have been the end of a war that for more than 50 years devastated millions of lives," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director for rights group Amnesty International. "Even though it was imperfect, the accord was a sure path to peace and justice."
According to TeleSUR:
The surprising results--which went against all exit polls that had the "Yes" vote winning easily--are showing that the areas most affected by the conflict have overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace. For example in the heavily affected area of Choco, with 95 percent of the vote counted, 79 percent voted "Yes." The Caribbean provinces have also voted "Yes."
In the capital of Bogota, the "Yes" vote won by 56 percent to 44 percent for the "No" vote.
[...] The "No" vote was led by former president Alvaro Uribe and big landowners who have run the country with impunity for decades. The fear-mongering campaign launched by these forces, with the support of right-wing media, proved too much for the forces for peace.
On Twitter, journalist and commentator Vijay Prashad also made note of the geographic breakdown:
\u201cImportant: the areas of Colombia that faced the worst of the civil war voted 'Yes' for peace. Areas least hit voted against the deal.\u201d— Vijay Prashad (@Vijay Prashad) 1475453115
CNN reported:
Likened to the fallout from the United Kingdom's "Brexit" referendum, the vote's unexpected failure has left the Colombian political classes reeling and unsure how to respond in order to save four years of hard negotiation with the Marxist militia.
Indeed, Reuters quoted one "No" voter who said: "We never thought this could happen. Now I just hope the government, the opposition, and the FARC come up with something intelligent that includes us all."
The BBC reported that "Most of those who voted 'no' said they thought the peace agreement was letting the rebels 'get away with murder'."
But others said that a campaign of fear won the day:
\u201c.@marioradio99 on Colombia's vote against FARC-government peace deal: \u201cFear was so palpable and so strong\u2026 It was almost inevitable\u201d\u201d— Democracy Now! (@Democracy Now!) 1475497804
\u201cRejection of #Colombia peace reaffirms an ancient truth of democracy: dramatic appeals to fear, nation, vengeance can win elections. #Trump\u201d— Allan Nairn (@Allan Nairn) 1475464695
\u201cFear, hatred and low turnout have cancelled years of negotiations and hope for peace and the future in Colombia. Lessons for November? https://t.co/dZrUauUK2S\u201d— Ana Dopico (@Ana Dopico) 1475447630
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, "[p]utting on a brave face after a major political defeat," as Reuters put it, said Monday that he "won't give up." He sent government negotiators back to Cuba on Monday morning to meet with FARC leaders, and "said he would meet with Colombia's opposition, led by former president and senator Alvaro Uribe, a mortal enemy of the FARC who has gained powerful new leverage over any potential attempt to rewrite the peace deal," the Washington Post reported.
FARC leader Rodrigo Londono (known as "Timochenko") also reiterated a commitment to peace, saying on Sunday: "The FARC reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future. To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph."
Both sides said the historic ceasefire, reached in June, would remain in place.
In an outcome described as "shocking," "painful," and "unspeakably sad," Colombian voters on Sunday rejected a landmark peace deal that would have ended a deadly 52-year war between the government and FARC guerillas.
Turnout was reportedly low, and the win was narrow, with the "No" vote leading by less than one percentage point, 50.2 percent to 49.8 percent.
"Today will be remembered by history as the moment Colombia turned its back on what could have been the end of a war that for more than 50 years devastated millions of lives," said Erika Guevara-Rosas, Americas director for rights group Amnesty International. "Even though it was imperfect, the accord was a sure path to peace and justice."
According to TeleSUR:
The surprising results--which went against all exit polls that had the "Yes" vote winning easily--are showing that the areas most affected by the conflict have overwhelmingly voted "Yes" for peace. For example in the heavily affected area of Choco, with 95 percent of the vote counted, 79 percent voted "Yes." The Caribbean provinces have also voted "Yes."
In the capital of Bogota, the "Yes" vote won by 56 percent to 44 percent for the "No" vote.
[...] The "No" vote was led by former president Alvaro Uribe and big landowners who have run the country with impunity for decades. The fear-mongering campaign launched by these forces, with the support of right-wing media, proved too much for the forces for peace.
On Twitter, journalist and commentator Vijay Prashad also made note of the geographic breakdown:
\u201cImportant: the areas of Colombia that faced the worst of the civil war voted 'Yes' for peace. Areas least hit voted against the deal.\u201d— Vijay Prashad (@Vijay Prashad) 1475453115
CNN reported:
Likened to the fallout from the United Kingdom's "Brexit" referendum, the vote's unexpected failure has left the Colombian political classes reeling and unsure how to respond in order to save four years of hard negotiation with the Marxist militia.
Indeed, Reuters quoted one "No" voter who said: "We never thought this could happen. Now I just hope the government, the opposition, and the FARC come up with something intelligent that includes us all."
The BBC reported that "Most of those who voted 'no' said they thought the peace agreement was letting the rebels 'get away with murder'."
But others said that a campaign of fear won the day:
\u201c.@marioradio99 on Colombia's vote against FARC-government peace deal: \u201cFear was so palpable and so strong\u2026 It was almost inevitable\u201d\u201d— Democracy Now! (@Democracy Now!) 1475497804
\u201cRejection of #Colombia peace reaffirms an ancient truth of democracy: dramatic appeals to fear, nation, vengeance can win elections. #Trump\u201d— Allan Nairn (@Allan Nairn) 1475464695
\u201cFear, hatred and low turnout have cancelled years of negotiations and hope for peace and the future in Colombia. Lessons for November? https://t.co/dZrUauUK2S\u201d— Ana Dopico (@Ana Dopico) 1475447630
Colombian President Juan Manuel Santos, "[p]utting on a brave face after a major political defeat," as Reuters put it, said Monday that he "won't give up." He sent government negotiators back to Cuba on Monday morning to meet with FARC leaders, and "said he would meet with Colombia's opposition, led by former president and senator Alvaro Uribe, a mortal enemy of the FARC who has gained powerful new leverage over any potential attempt to rewrite the peace deal," the Washington Post reported.
FARC leader Rodrigo Londono (known as "Timochenko") also reiterated a commitment to peace, saying on Sunday: "The FARC reiterates its disposition to use only words as a weapon to build toward the future. To the Colombian people who dream of peace, count on us, peace will triumph."
Both sides said the historic ceasefire, reached in June, would remain in place.