'What is Aleppo?' Wonders Gary Johnson in TV Interview Stumble
Libertarian presidential candidate later said he needs to get "smarter" on certain issues
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson seemed to inadvertently reveal a stunning lack of foreign policy knowledge on Thursday morning when he didn't know the name of the besieged Syrian city.
"What would you do about Aleppo?" Johnson was asked on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
"What is Aleppo?" the former New Mexico governor responded.
When asked if he was serious, Johnson replied that he was. Co-host Mike Barnicle briefly explained Aleppo's plight and the Syrian refugee crisis, and Johnson finally answered the question:
Okay, Got it. Well, with regard to Syria, I do think that it's a mess. I think the only way that we deal with Syria is to join hands with Russia to diplomatically bring that at an end but when we've aligned ourselves with--when we have supported the opposition, the Free Syrian Army, the Free Syrian Army is also coupled with the Islamists, and then the fact that we're also supporting the Kurds and this is, it's just a mess. And this is the result of regime change that we end up supporting and, inevitably, these regime changes have led to a less safe world.
"So Aleppo is the center of a lot of people's concerns across the planet about the terrible humanitarian crisis that is unfolding not only in Syria, but especially in Aleppo," co-host Joe Scarborough said in response. "You asked, 'What is Aleppo?' Do you really think that foreign policy is so insignificant that somebody running for president of the United States shouldn't even know what Aleppo is, where Aleppo is, why Aleppo is so important?"
"I do understand Aleppo and I understand the crisis that is going on," Johnson said. "But when we involve ourselves militarily, when we involve ourselves in these humanitarian issues, issues, we end up with a situation that in most cases is not better, and in many cases ends up being worse."
In an interview after his "Morning Joe" appearance, Johnson said "I'm incredibly frustrated with myself," and "went on to explain how he realizes he needs to get 'smarter' on certain issues," Politico reports.
Some pundits attempted to use Johnson's gaffe to slam all third-party candidates. However, the two major party candidates were also widely panned on Thursday for their Wednesday evening performance in a lackluster foreign policy forum.
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. In a few short weeks, US voters will have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson seemed to inadvertently reveal a stunning lack of foreign policy knowledge on Thursday morning when he didn't know the name of the besieged Syrian city.
"What would you do about Aleppo?" Johnson was asked on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
"What is Aleppo?" the former New Mexico governor responded.
When asked if he was serious, Johnson replied that he was. Co-host Mike Barnicle briefly explained Aleppo's plight and the Syrian refugee crisis, and Johnson finally answered the question:
Okay, Got it. Well, with regard to Syria, I do think that it's a mess. I think the only way that we deal with Syria is to join hands with Russia to diplomatically bring that at an end but when we've aligned ourselves with--when we have supported the opposition, the Free Syrian Army, the Free Syrian Army is also coupled with the Islamists, and then the fact that we're also supporting the Kurds and this is, it's just a mess. And this is the result of regime change that we end up supporting and, inevitably, these regime changes have led to a less safe world.
"So Aleppo is the center of a lot of people's concerns across the planet about the terrible humanitarian crisis that is unfolding not only in Syria, but especially in Aleppo," co-host Joe Scarborough said in response. "You asked, 'What is Aleppo?' Do you really think that foreign policy is so insignificant that somebody running for president of the United States shouldn't even know what Aleppo is, where Aleppo is, why Aleppo is so important?"
"I do understand Aleppo and I understand the crisis that is going on," Johnson said. "But when we involve ourselves militarily, when we involve ourselves in these humanitarian issues, issues, we end up with a situation that in most cases is not better, and in many cases ends up being worse."
In an interview after his "Morning Joe" appearance, Johnson said "I'm incredibly frustrated with myself," and "went on to explain how he realizes he needs to get 'smarter' on certain issues," Politico reports.
Some pundits attempted to use Johnson's gaffe to slam all third-party candidates. However, the two major party candidates were also widely panned on Thursday for their Wednesday evening performance in a lackluster foreign policy forum.
Libertarian presidential candidate Gary Johnson seemed to inadvertently reveal a stunning lack of foreign policy knowledge on Thursday morning when he didn't know the name of the besieged Syrian city.
"What would you do about Aleppo?" Johnson was asked on MSNBC's "Morning Joe."
"What is Aleppo?" the former New Mexico governor responded.
When asked if he was serious, Johnson replied that he was. Co-host Mike Barnicle briefly explained Aleppo's plight and the Syrian refugee crisis, and Johnson finally answered the question:
Okay, Got it. Well, with regard to Syria, I do think that it's a mess. I think the only way that we deal with Syria is to join hands with Russia to diplomatically bring that at an end but when we've aligned ourselves with--when we have supported the opposition, the Free Syrian Army, the Free Syrian Army is also coupled with the Islamists, and then the fact that we're also supporting the Kurds and this is, it's just a mess. And this is the result of regime change that we end up supporting and, inevitably, these regime changes have led to a less safe world.
"So Aleppo is the center of a lot of people's concerns across the planet about the terrible humanitarian crisis that is unfolding not only in Syria, but especially in Aleppo," co-host Joe Scarborough said in response. "You asked, 'What is Aleppo?' Do you really think that foreign policy is so insignificant that somebody running for president of the United States shouldn't even know what Aleppo is, where Aleppo is, why Aleppo is so important?"
"I do understand Aleppo and I understand the crisis that is going on," Johnson said. "But when we involve ourselves militarily, when we involve ourselves in these humanitarian issues, issues, we end up with a situation that in most cases is not better, and in many cases ends up being worse."
In an interview after his "Morning Joe" appearance, Johnson said "I'm incredibly frustrated with myself," and "went on to explain how he realizes he needs to get 'smarter' on certain issues," Politico reports.
Some pundits attempted to use Johnson's gaffe to slam all third-party candidates. However, the two major party candidates were also widely panned on Thursday for their Wednesday evening performance in a lackluster foreign policy forum.