It has been seven years since the G20 first committed to phase out fossil fuel subsidies, yet we've seen very little progress," says Alex Doukas of Oil Change International. (Photo: Andrew Hart/flickr/cc)
Sep 05, 2016
Despite calls from environmental leaders, major insurance companies, global investors, and climate groups, the G20 has failed to put a deadline on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, yet again.
German press agency DPA reported Monday that a late draft of the G20 Leaders' Communique "did not mention plans to fulfill a promise the G20 made seven years ago to put an end to controversial fossil fuel subsidies."
That recalcitrance runs counter to wide swaths of public opinion.
An open letter (pdf) in June from more than 200 civil society organizations called for a 2020 cut-off date, warning that the estimated $444 billion in G20 subsidies to the fossil fuels industry "are locking in long-lived, high-emitting infrastructure and unlocking new fossil fuel reserves." Bloomberg, in an editorial last week, called fossil fuel subsidies "an egregious policy failure that has been allowed to persist for far too long."
On the heels of the U.S. and China formally doing so on Saturday, the entire G20 did pledge to join the Paris climate agreement, with the communique saying leaders "expect a rapid implementation of the agreement in all its dimensions."
But that deal--already limited in its ability to curtail global warming--is just lip service without action on subsides, said Oil Change International senior campaigner Alex Doukas on Monday.
"On China's watch, G20 leaders have again failed to set a deadline to end fossil fuel subsidies, despite first agreeing to do so in 2009," Doukas said. "Time is running out. Every dollar wasted on fossil fuel subsidies pushes us closer to climate disaster and makes the transition to clean energy more difficult. As more governments take the important step of ratifying the Paris Agreement on climate change, they must stop giving handouts to big polluters, which undermine the spirit and the letter of the Paris deal."
Li Shuo, Greenpeace East Asia's senior climate policy adviser, echoed that charge, declaring: "Handing out money to the fossil fuel industry is simply not compatible with the Paris Agreement."
What's more, Doukas toldClimate Home, the communique included new language promising to "promote methods of extraction, transportation and processing of natural gas that minimise environmental impacts"--which would appear to directly contradict the goal of ending subsidies.
Both Greenpeace and Oil Change International called on Germany to push for strong climate action as new G20 host.
"If German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants to maintain her reputation as a climate champion through next year's G20 presidency, she must lead the way in securing a strong commitment from world leaders to end all fossil fuel subsidies by 2020," Doukas said. "The whole world is telling G20 leaders it's time to stop funding fossils."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Despite calls from environmental leaders, major insurance companies, global investors, and climate groups, the G20 has failed to put a deadline on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, yet again.
German press agency DPA reported Monday that a late draft of the G20 Leaders' Communique "did not mention plans to fulfill a promise the G20 made seven years ago to put an end to controversial fossil fuel subsidies."
That recalcitrance runs counter to wide swaths of public opinion.
An open letter (pdf) in June from more than 200 civil society organizations called for a 2020 cut-off date, warning that the estimated $444 billion in G20 subsidies to the fossil fuels industry "are locking in long-lived, high-emitting infrastructure and unlocking new fossil fuel reserves." Bloomberg, in an editorial last week, called fossil fuel subsidies "an egregious policy failure that has been allowed to persist for far too long."
On the heels of the U.S. and China formally doing so on Saturday, the entire G20 did pledge to join the Paris climate agreement, with the communique saying leaders "expect a rapid implementation of the agreement in all its dimensions."
But that deal--already limited in its ability to curtail global warming--is just lip service without action on subsides, said Oil Change International senior campaigner Alex Doukas on Monday.
"On China's watch, G20 leaders have again failed to set a deadline to end fossil fuel subsidies, despite first agreeing to do so in 2009," Doukas said. "Time is running out. Every dollar wasted on fossil fuel subsidies pushes us closer to climate disaster and makes the transition to clean energy more difficult. As more governments take the important step of ratifying the Paris Agreement on climate change, they must stop giving handouts to big polluters, which undermine the spirit and the letter of the Paris deal."
Li Shuo, Greenpeace East Asia's senior climate policy adviser, echoed that charge, declaring: "Handing out money to the fossil fuel industry is simply not compatible with the Paris Agreement."
What's more, Doukas toldClimate Home, the communique included new language promising to "promote methods of extraction, transportation and processing of natural gas that minimise environmental impacts"--which would appear to directly contradict the goal of ending subsidies.
Both Greenpeace and Oil Change International called on Germany to push for strong climate action as new G20 host.
"If German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants to maintain her reputation as a climate champion through next year's G20 presidency, she must lead the way in securing a strong commitment from world leaders to end all fossil fuel subsidies by 2020," Doukas said. "The whole world is telling G20 leaders it's time to stop funding fossils."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Despite calls from environmental leaders, major insurance companies, global investors, and climate groups, the G20 has failed to put a deadline on phasing out fossil fuel subsidies, yet again.
German press agency DPA reported Monday that a late draft of the G20 Leaders' Communique "did not mention plans to fulfill a promise the G20 made seven years ago to put an end to controversial fossil fuel subsidies."
That recalcitrance runs counter to wide swaths of public opinion.
An open letter (pdf) in June from more than 200 civil society organizations called for a 2020 cut-off date, warning that the estimated $444 billion in G20 subsidies to the fossil fuels industry "are locking in long-lived, high-emitting infrastructure and unlocking new fossil fuel reserves." Bloomberg, in an editorial last week, called fossil fuel subsidies "an egregious policy failure that has been allowed to persist for far too long."
On the heels of the U.S. and China formally doing so on Saturday, the entire G20 did pledge to join the Paris climate agreement, with the communique saying leaders "expect a rapid implementation of the agreement in all its dimensions."
But that deal--already limited in its ability to curtail global warming--is just lip service without action on subsides, said Oil Change International senior campaigner Alex Doukas on Monday.
"On China's watch, G20 leaders have again failed to set a deadline to end fossil fuel subsidies, despite first agreeing to do so in 2009," Doukas said. "Time is running out. Every dollar wasted on fossil fuel subsidies pushes us closer to climate disaster and makes the transition to clean energy more difficult. As more governments take the important step of ratifying the Paris Agreement on climate change, they must stop giving handouts to big polluters, which undermine the spirit and the letter of the Paris deal."
Li Shuo, Greenpeace East Asia's senior climate policy adviser, echoed that charge, declaring: "Handing out money to the fossil fuel industry is simply not compatible with the Paris Agreement."
What's more, Doukas toldClimate Home, the communique included new language promising to "promote methods of extraction, transportation and processing of natural gas that minimise environmental impacts"--which would appear to directly contradict the goal of ending subsidies.
Both Greenpeace and Oil Change International called on Germany to push for strong climate action as new G20 host.
"If German Chancellor Angela Merkel wants to maintain her reputation as a climate champion through next year's G20 presidency, she must lead the way in securing a strong commitment from world leaders to end all fossil fuel subsidies by 2020," Doukas said. "The whole world is telling G20 leaders it's time to stop funding fossils."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.