SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Setback for Equality: Supreme Court Blocks Transgender Teen's Bathroom Access
ACLU criticizes ruling for allowing Virginia school to 'isolate and stigmatize' teen
Aug 04, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked an order (pdf) that gave a transgender Virginia teen access to the same school restrooms as his male peers, which means he will not be able to use the facilities that correspond to his gender identity when classes resume in the fall.
Gavin Grimm, 17, brought the case against the Gloucester county school board in 2015 over what he argued was a discriminatory policy. In April, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted him a major victory by holding that Title IX protects the rights of transgender students to use the facilities consistent with their gender identity. The court sent the case back to the trial judge for further proceedings.
The high court's stay of the order means Grimm's school can continue to "isolate and stigmatize" him, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented and said they would not have stayed the ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer sided with the court's four conservatives--Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito--"as a courtesy" on the grounds that the ruling would "preserve the status quo" while Grimm's fight continues.
ACLU senior staff attorney Joshua Block, who is representing Grimm, said, "We are disappointed that the court has issued a stay and that Gavin will have to begin another school year isolated from his peers and stigmatized by the Gloucester County school board just because he's a boy who is transgender."
The ruling "also suggests that four Justices--the number needed to review a case on the merits--could be willing to take the case on, possibly as soon as this fall," wrote Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog.
Howe said:
The one-page ruling indicated that the district court's order (as well as an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Virginia) will at the very least remain on hold until the court rules on the school board's petition for review, which is due on August 29. If the Justices grant review, the district court's order would remain on hold until the court can hear oral arguments and issue its opinion.
"We remain hopeful that Gavin will ultimately prevail," Block said Wednesday.
It is the high court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier in LGBTQ rights.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked an order (pdf) that gave a transgender Virginia teen access to the same school restrooms as his male peers, which means he will not be able to use the facilities that correspond to his gender identity when classes resume in the fall.
Gavin Grimm, 17, brought the case against the Gloucester county school board in 2015 over what he argued was a discriminatory policy. In April, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted him a major victory by holding that Title IX protects the rights of transgender students to use the facilities consistent with their gender identity. The court sent the case back to the trial judge for further proceedings.
The high court's stay of the order means Grimm's school can continue to "isolate and stigmatize" him, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented and said they would not have stayed the ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer sided with the court's four conservatives--Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito--"as a courtesy" on the grounds that the ruling would "preserve the status quo" while Grimm's fight continues.
ACLU senior staff attorney Joshua Block, who is representing Grimm, said, "We are disappointed that the court has issued a stay and that Gavin will have to begin another school year isolated from his peers and stigmatized by the Gloucester County school board just because he's a boy who is transgender."
The ruling "also suggests that four Justices--the number needed to review a case on the merits--could be willing to take the case on, possibly as soon as this fall," wrote Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog.
Howe said:
The one-page ruling indicated that the district court's order (as well as an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Virginia) will at the very least remain on hold until the court rules on the school board's petition for review, which is due on August 29. If the Justices grant review, the district court's order would remain on hold until the court can hear oral arguments and issue its opinion.
"We remain hopeful that Gavin will ultimately prevail," Block said Wednesday.
It is the high court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier in LGBTQ rights.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked an order (pdf) that gave a transgender Virginia teen access to the same school restrooms as his male peers, which means he will not be able to use the facilities that correspond to his gender identity when classes resume in the fall.
Gavin Grimm, 17, brought the case against the Gloucester county school board in 2015 over what he argued was a discriminatory policy. In April, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted him a major victory by holding that Title IX protects the rights of transgender students to use the facilities consistent with their gender identity. The court sent the case back to the trial judge for further proceedings.
The high court's stay of the order means Grimm's school can continue to "isolate and stigmatize" him, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented and said they would not have stayed the ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer sided with the court's four conservatives--Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito--"as a courtesy" on the grounds that the ruling would "preserve the status quo" while Grimm's fight continues.
ACLU senior staff attorney Joshua Block, who is representing Grimm, said, "We are disappointed that the court has issued a stay and that Gavin will have to begin another school year isolated from his peers and stigmatized by the Gloucester County school board just because he's a boy who is transgender."
The ruling "also suggests that four Justices--the number needed to review a case on the merits--could be willing to take the case on, possibly as soon as this fall," wrote Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog.
Howe said:
The one-page ruling indicated that the district court's order (as well as an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Virginia) will at the very least remain on hold until the court rules on the school board's petition for review, which is due on August 29. If the Justices grant review, the district court's order would remain on hold until the court can hear oral arguments and issue its opinion.
"We remain hopeful that Gavin will ultimately prevail," Block said Wednesday.
It is the high court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier in LGBTQ rights.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.