It is the U.S. Supreme Court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier for LGBTQ rights. (Photo: Mark Fischer/flickr/cc)
Aug 04, 2016
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked an order (pdf) that gave a transgender Virginia teen access to the same school restrooms as his male peers, which means he will not be able to use the facilities that correspond to his gender identity when classes resume in the fall.
Gavin Grimm, 17, brought the case against the Gloucester county school board in 2015 over what he argued was a discriminatory policy. In April, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted him a major victory by holding that Title IX protects the rights of transgender students to use the facilities consistent with their gender identity. The court sent the case back to the trial judge for further proceedings.
The high court's stay of the order means Grimm's school can continue to "isolate and stigmatize" him, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented and said they would not have stayed the ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer sided with the court's four conservatives--Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito--"as a courtesy" on the grounds that the ruling would "preserve the status quo" while Grimm's fight continues.
ACLU senior staff attorney Joshua Block, who is representing Grimm, said, "We are disappointed that the court has issued a stay and that Gavin will have to begin another school year isolated from his peers and stigmatized by the Gloucester County school board just because he's a boy who is transgender."
The ruling "also suggests that four Justices--the number needed to review a case on the merits--could be willing to take the case on, possibly as soon as this fall," wrote Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog.
Howe said:
The one-page ruling indicated that the district court's order (as well as an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Virginia) will at the very least remain on hold until the court rules on the school board's petition for review, which is due on August 29. If the Justices grant review, the district court's order would remain on hold until the court can hear oral arguments and issue its opinion.
"We remain hopeful that Gavin will ultimately prevail," Block said Wednesday.
It is the high court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier in LGBTQ rights.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked an order (pdf) that gave a transgender Virginia teen access to the same school restrooms as his male peers, which means he will not be able to use the facilities that correspond to his gender identity when classes resume in the fall.
Gavin Grimm, 17, brought the case against the Gloucester county school board in 2015 over what he argued was a discriminatory policy. In April, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted him a major victory by holding that Title IX protects the rights of transgender students to use the facilities consistent with their gender identity. The court sent the case back to the trial judge for further proceedings.
The high court's stay of the order means Grimm's school can continue to "isolate and stigmatize" him, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented and said they would not have stayed the ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer sided with the court's four conservatives--Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito--"as a courtesy" on the grounds that the ruling would "preserve the status quo" while Grimm's fight continues.
ACLU senior staff attorney Joshua Block, who is representing Grimm, said, "We are disappointed that the court has issued a stay and that Gavin will have to begin another school year isolated from his peers and stigmatized by the Gloucester County school board just because he's a boy who is transgender."
The ruling "also suggests that four Justices--the number needed to review a case on the merits--could be willing to take the case on, possibly as soon as this fall," wrote Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog.
Howe said:
The one-page ruling indicated that the district court's order (as well as an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Virginia) will at the very least remain on hold until the court rules on the school board's petition for review, which is due on August 29. If the Justices grant review, the district court's order would remain on hold until the court can hear oral arguments and issue its opinion.
"We remain hopeful that Gavin will ultimately prevail," Block said Wednesday.
It is the high court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier in LGBTQ rights.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
The U.S. Supreme Court on Wednesday blocked an order (pdf) that gave a transgender Virginia teen access to the same school restrooms as his male peers, which means he will not be able to use the facilities that correspond to his gender identity when classes resume in the fall.
Gavin Grimm, 17, brought the case against the Gloucester county school board in 2015 over what he argued was a discriminatory policy. In April, the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals granted him a major victory by holding that Title IX protects the rights of transgender students to use the facilities consistent with their gender identity. The court sent the case back to the trial judge for further proceedings.
The high court's stay of the order means Grimm's school can continue to "isolate and stigmatize" him, the American Civil Liberties Union (ACLU) said Thursday.
Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan dissented and said they would not have stayed the ruling. Justice Stephen Breyer sided with the court's four conservatives--Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito--"as a courtesy" on the grounds that the ruling would "preserve the status quo" while Grimm's fight continues.
ACLU senior staff attorney Joshua Block, who is representing Grimm, said, "We are disappointed that the court has issued a stay and that Gavin will have to begin another school year isolated from his peers and stigmatized by the Gloucester County school board just because he's a boy who is transgender."
The ruling "also suggests that four Justices--the number needed to review a case on the merits--could be willing to take the case on, possibly as soon as this fall," wrote Amy Howe at SCOTUSBlog.
Howe said:
The one-page ruling indicated that the district court's order (as well as an earlier ruling by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit, which hears appeals from federal district courts in Virginia) will at the very least remain on hold until the court rules on the school board's petition for review, which is due on August 29. If the Justices grant review, the district court's order would remain on hold until the court can hear oral arguments and issue its opinion.
"We remain hopeful that Gavin will ultimately prevail," Block said Wednesday.
It is the high court's first ruling on the issue that has become a new frontier in LGBTQ rights.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.