SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
A worker looks at tanks holding contaminated water at the site of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Station. (Photo: IAEA/flickr/cc)
Whistleblowers: Nuke Watchdogs Not Doing Enough to Prevent Canadian Fukushima
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue. That's a safety culture issue."
Jul 20, 2016
Anonymous whistleblowers have reportedly raised the alarm over nuclear safety in Canada, with an open letter warning of underestimated hazards and undisclosed risks that could make the nation vulnerable to a Fukushima-style disaster.
The letter, sent several weeks ago to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) president Michael Binder, was purportedly written by an internal group of specialists who opted for anonymity because they "are not confident in whistleblower protection."
On Tuesday, it was reported that federal officials would meet with Binder to discuss the letter's allegations. The CNSC also said this week it had "initiated a formal review" of the whistleblowers' claims.
According to the Globe and Mail, the missive "points to five separate cases in which the commission's staff sat on relevant material about risk or non-compliance that might have called the safety of a plant into question."
The Globe and Mail continues:
The letter says hazards have been underestimated, plant operators have been permitted to skip requirements of the licensing regime and assessments outlining what could happen in the event of a major-scale nuclear disaster--such as the one that occurred in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011--have been withheld from the commissioners and the public.
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue," Greenpeace Canada senior energy analyst Shawn-Patrick Stensil told the paper, referring to the allegation that CNSC staff is ignoring certain risks. "That's a safety culture issue."
Canada is home to five nuclear power plants in three provinces, which house 22 nuclear power reactors. Nuclear energy produces about 15 percent of Canada's electricity, according to the CNSC.
The National Observer notes:
The letter is much like one sent by 14 environmental organizations in March to Prime Minister Trudeau. Greenpeace Canada and the Canadian Environmental Law Association among others claimed that CNSC had been testing the "political environment" in 2015 before implementing changes needed to improve nuclear oversight.
They claimed that, under former prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada failed to keep pace with other nuclear powers in preparing the country for a Fukushima-style disaster.
"Our primary concern is that CNSC Commissioners do not receive sufficient information to make balanced judgments," the letter reads.
Indeed, in response to the news, the group Beyond Nuclear said it "can vouch, from extensive, direct experience, that CNSC staff's extreme bias in favor of nuclear power promotion is over the top."
Meanwhile, over the border in the U.S., an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity published this week shows how the U.S. Energy Department "lets its private contractors police themselves, producing 'chilled work environments' in which employees who find wrongdoing have no useful path for complaints."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Anonymous whistleblowers have reportedly raised the alarm over nuclear safety in Canada, with an open letter warning of underestimated hazards and undisclosed risks that could make the nation vulnerable to a Fukushima-style disaster.
The letter, sent several weeks ago to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) president Michael Binder, was purportedly written by an internal group of specialists who opted for anonymity because they "are not confident in whistleblower protection."
On Tuesday, it was reported that federal officials would meet with Binder to discuss the letter's allegations. The CNSC also said this week it had "initiated a formal review" of the whistleblowers' claims.
According to the Globe and Mail, the missive "points to five separate cases in which the commission's staff sat on relevant material about risk or non-compliance that might have called the safety of a plant into question."
The Globe and Mail continues:
The letter says hazards have been underestimated, plant operators have been permitted to skip requirements of the licensing regime and assessments outlining what could happen in the event of a major-scale nuclear disaster--such as the one that occurred in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011--have been withheld from the commissioners and the public.
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue," Greenpeace Canada senior energy analyst Shawn-Patrick Stensil told the paper, referring to the allegation that CNSC staff is ignoring certain risks. "That's a safety culture issue."
Canada is home to five nuclear power plants in three provinces, which house 22 nuclear power reactors. Nuclear energy produces about 15 percent of Canada's electricity, according to the CNSC.
The National Observer notes:
The letter is much like one sent by 14 environmental organizations in March to Prime Minister Trudeau. Greenpeace Canada and the Canadian Environmental Law Association among others claimed that CNSC had been testing the "political environment" in 2015 before implementing changes needed to improve nuclear oversight.
They claimed that, under former prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada failed to keep pace with other nuclear powers in preparing the country for a Fukushima-style disaster.
"Our primary concern is that CNSC Commissioners do not receive sufficient information to make balanced judgments," the letter reads.
Indeed, in response to the news, the group Beyond Nuclear said it "can vouch, from extensive, direct experience, that CNSC staff's extreme bias in favor of nuclear power promotion is over the top."
Meanwhile, over the border in the U.S., an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity published this week shows how the U.S. Energy Department "lets its private contractors police themselves, producing 'chilled work environments' in which employees who find wrongdoing have no useful path for complaints."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Anonymous whistleblowers have reportedly raised the alarm over nuclear safety in Canada, with an open letter warning of underestimated hazards and undisclosed risks that could make the nation vulnerable to a Fukushima-style disaster.
The letter, sent several weeks ago to Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission (CNSC) president Michael Binder, was purportedly written by an internal group of specialists who opted for anonymity because they "are not confident in whistleblower protection."
On Tuesday, it was reported that federal officials would meet with Binder to discuss the letter's allegations. The CNSC also said this week it had "initiated a formal review" of the whistleblowers' claims.
According to the Globe and Mail, the missive "points to five separate cases in which the commission's staff sat on relevant material about risk or non-compliance that might have called the safety of a plant into question."
The Globe and Mail continues:
The letter says hazards have been underestimated, plant operators have been permitted to skip requirements of the licensing regime and assessments outlining what could happen in the event of a major-scale nuclear disaster--such as the one that occurred in Fukushima, Japan, in 2011--have been withheld from the commissioners and the public.
"That's not a nuts-and-bolts or an engineering issue," Greenpeace Canada senior energy analyst Shawn-Patrick Stensil told the paper, referring to the allegation that CNSC staff is ignoring certain risks. "That's a safety culture issue."
Canada is home to five nuclear power plants in three provinces, which house 22 nuclear power reactors. Nuclear energy produces about 15 percent of Canada's electricity, according to the CNSC.
The National Observer notes:
The letter is much like one sent by 14 environmental organizations in March to Prime Minister Trudeau. Greenpeace Canada and the Canadian Environmental Law Association among others claimed that CNSC had been testing the "political environment" in 2015 before implementing changes needed to improve nuclear oversight.
They claimed that, under former prime minister Stephen Harper, Canada failed to keep pace with other nuclear powers in preparing the country for a Fukushima-style disaster.
"Our primary concern is that CNSC Commissioners do not receive sufficient information to make balanced judgments," the letter reads.
Indeed, in response to the news, the group Beyond Nuclear said it "can vouch, from extensive, direct experience, that CNSC staff's extreme bias in favor of nuclear power promotion is over the top."
Meanwhile, over the border in the U.S., an investigation by the Center for Public Integrity published this week shows how the U.S. Energy Department "lets its private contractors police themselves, producing 'chilled work environments' in which employees who find wrongdoing have no useful path for complaints."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.