As Wealthy Surge, U.S. Poor and Middle Class Incomes Have Gone Backward
Poorer households saw their income drop from a median of $26,373 in 1999 to $23,811 in 2014, according to new research
Middle- and low-income households in the U.S. made less money in 2014 than they did in 1999 as the middle class lost ground in almost 90 percent of the country's metropolitan areas, a new analysis by the Pew Research Center released Wednesday has found.
The report looked at 229 of the 381 federally designated "metropolitan statistical areas" in the U.S., from Seattle to Boston, which accounted for 76 percent of the nationwide population in 2014. It found that poorer households saw their income drop from a median of $26,373 in 1999 to $23,811 in 2014, while middle-class incomes fell from $77,898 to $72,919 in that same time period.
The erosion of the middle class came as household incomes decreased, "a reminder that the economy has yet to fully recover from the effects of the Great Recession of 2007-09," Pew said--but more than that, it is a reflection of rising income inequality.
The report continues:
The current and future status of the American middle class continues to be a central issue in the 2016 presidential campaign. Moreover, new economic research suggests that a struggling middle class could be holding back the potential for future economic growth. The national trend is clear--the middle class is losing ground as a share of the population, and its share of aggregate U.S. household income is also declining.
With fewer families in the middle tier, the gap between rich and poor is widening, the report found, with the share of adults in lower-income tiers rising in 160 areas.
The report follows a previous Pew analysis which found that for the first time in more than 40 years, the middle class is no longer the majority in America.
"The deeper root at what is driving inequality and really hollowing out the middle class--that is a pattern very strong in the metro areas," Rakesh Kochhar, associate director of the Pew Research Center, told the Los Angeles Times. "It is cutting across all communities. No one seems immune to this widening inequality trend."
"You can't say this is a very positive change," he added. "[T]his movement reflects more inequality in income and can be a hindrance to economic growth."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Middle- and low-income households in the U.S. made less money in 2014 than they did in 1999 as the middle class lost ground in almost 90 percent of the country's metropolitan areas, a new analysis by the Pew Research Center released Wednesday has found.
The report looked at 229 of the 381 federally designated "metropolitan statistical areas" in the U.S., from Seattle to Boston, which accounted for 76 percent of the nationwide population in 2014. It found that poorer households saw their income drop from a median of $26,373 in 1999 to $23,811 in 2014, while middle-class incomes fell from $77,898 to $72,919 in that same time period.
The erosion of the middle class came as household incomes decreased, "a reminder that the economy has yet to fully recover from the effects of the Great Recession of 2007-09," Pew said--but more than that, it is a reflection of rising income inequality.
The report continues:
The current and future status of the American middle class continues to be a central issue in the 2016 presidential campaign. Moreover, new economic research suggests that a struggling middle class could be holding back the potential for future economic growth. The national trend is clear--the middle class is losing ground as a share of the population, and its share of aggregate U.S. household income is also declining.
With fewer families in the middle tier, the gap between rich and poor is widening, the report found, with the share of adults in lower-income tiers rising in 160 areas.
The report follows a previous Pew analysis which found that for the first time in more than 40 years, the middle class is no longer the majority in America.
"The deeper root at what is driving inequality and really hollowing out the middle class--that is a pattern very strong in the metro areas," Rakesh Kochhar, associate director of the Pew Research Center, told the Los Angeles Times. "It is cutting across all communities. No one seems immune to this widening inequality trend."
"You can't say this is a very positive change," he added. "[T]his movement reflects more inequality in income and can be a hindrance to economic growth."
Middle- and low-income households in the U.S. made less money in 2014 than they did in 1999 as the middle class lost ground in almost 90 percent of the country's metropolitan areas, a new analysis by the Pew Research Center released Wednesday has found.
The report looked at 229 of the 381 federally designated "metropolitan statistical areas" in the U.S., from Seattle to Boston, which accounted for 76 percent of the nationwide population in 2014. It found that poorer households saw their income drop from a median of $26,373 in 1999 to $23,811 in 2014, while middle-class incomes fell from $77,898 to $72,919 in that same time period.
The erosion of the middle class came as household incomes decreased, "a reminder that the economy has yet to fully recover from the effects of the Great Recession of 2007-09," Pew said--but more than that, it is a reflection of rising income inequality.
The report continues:
The current and future status of the American middle class continues to be a central issue in the 2016 presidential campaign. Moreover, new economic research suggests that a struggling middle class could be holding back the potential for future economic growth. The national trend is clear--the middle class is losing ground as a share of the population, and its share of aggregate U.S. household income is also declining.
With fewer families in the middle tier, the gap between rich and poor is widening, the report found, with the share of adults in lower-income tiers rising in 160 areas.
The report follows a previous Pew analysis which found that for the first time in more than 40 years, the middle class is no longer the majority in America.
"The deeper root at what is driving inequality and really hollowing out the middle class--that is a pattern very strong in the metro areas," Rakesh Kochhar, associate director of the Pew Research Center, told the Los Angeles Times. "It is cutting across all communities. No one seems immune to this widening inequality trend."
"You can't say this is a very positive change," he added. "[T]his movement reflects more inequality in income and can be a hindrance to economic growth."