Feb 23, 2016
President Barack Obama on Tuesday outlined his long-awaited plan to close the Guantanamo Bay military detention center in Cuba, but rights groups immediately condemned the proposal as a series of "talking points" rather than any real effort to end the indefinite detention of prisoners and restore justice.
"The infamy of Guantanamo has never been just its location, but rather its immoral and illegal regime of indefinite detention," said the Center for Constitutional Rights (CCR), which represents a number of Guantanamo detainees. "Closing Guantanamo in any meaningful sense means putting an end to that practice."
During a press briefing, the president outlined the steps that the Pentagon will take to shutter the infamous offshore facility where dozens of alleged terror suspects have been subject to torture, and languished for over a decade without charge or trial. Currently, 91 detainees are still held at the facility.
The plan (pdf) includes transferring abroad the 35 detainees already approved for release, accelerating periodic reviews, reforming the military commissions process, and working with Congress to determine a "secure location" at a maximum security prison within the United States to relocate the remaining prisoners.
"We are dealing with a current group of detainees," which--because of the "manner in which they were originally apprehended"-- are particularly "complex," Obama said during Tuesday's press briefing, alluding to the notorious torture and rendition of post-9/11 terrorism suspects.
"We are closing a chapter in our history and reflecting on the lessons learned about 9/11...to guide our nation going forward," Obama stated.
The president--who, during the 2008 election, campaigned on a promise to close Guantanamo--said that 15 years after 9/11, "we are still having to defend a facility and a process where not a single verdict has been reached in those attacks."
Keeping Guantanamo open, he said, is "counter-productive in our fight against terrorists," drains military resources, harms partnerships with foreign allies, and "undermines our standing in the world."
"This plan demonstrates what the Guantanamo prisoners have always been: not dangerous men, but the ultimate pawns in the power games of others."
--Aisha Maniar, London Guantanamo Campaign
"I don't want to pass this problem on to the next president, whoever it is," he added. However, Obama acknowledged that his plan, which requires substantial Congressional support, faces a "fair amount of opposition" from Republican lawmakers.
Given that, critics of the plan argue that the steps laid out do very little to effectively "close Guantanamo."
"Without ending arbitrary indefinite detention, there is no end to the 'misguided experiment' that is Guantanamo Bay," said Aisha Maniar, organizer of the London Guantanamo Campaign, citing the president's own remarks on the prison.
"Instead," Maniar continued, "Barack Obama has offered Congress a politically expedient plan that will help to protect his historic legacy as a president who tried. Coming at a key point in this year's presidential campaign, and anticipating 'a fair amount of opposition in Congress,' the plan offers politicians on both sides a talking point to appear tough on terrorism and national security issues, while eschewing real threats."
"The plan offers no viable solution to ending what Guantanamo represents, any more than it offers either freedom or justice for remaining prisoners," Maniar added. "This plan demonstrates what the Guantanamo prisoners have always been: not dangerous men, but the ultimate pawns in the power games of others."
The Center for Constitutional Rights issued a similar critique of the plan, which it describes as "several obvious steps" that the organization "has long called for, and that the Obama administration has long reneged on."
"But talk is cheap," the statement continues: "Unless the Obama administration shows real will and dramatically steps up its efforts...men whose detentions the administration itself has determined are unnecessary, who have already been imprisoned for 14 years, will continue to languish long after President Obama has left the White House. This is senseless and cruel."
The group is calling for the 35 detainees to be transferred "without delay," and demanding that the 33 men still waiting for periodic review are "reviewed in time to have an actual chance at being transferred this year."
"Meanwhile," CCR continues, "the centerpiece of the plan--moving those detainees who have not been and will never be charged with any crime to a prison in the U.S.--does not 'close Guantanamo,' it merely relocates it to a new ZIP Code."
Anthony Romero, the executive director of the American Civil Liberties Union, conceded that Obama deserves "praise for trying to make good on his promise," but noted that the decision to "preserve the Bush-created military commissions is a mistake." Ultimately, Romero said, "the president's continuing embrace of indefinite detention without charge or trial will tarnish his legacy."
We're optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place.
We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter counts.
Your contribution supports this new media model—free, independent, and dedicated to uncovering the truth. Stand with us in the fight for social justice, human rights, and equality. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. Join with us today!
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.