SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry and Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov. (Photo: United States Mission Geneva/flickr/cc)
World powers on Friday agreed to a plan for a "cessation of hostilities" in Syria, to begin next week, which would allow humanitarian aid to reach besieged civilians but would not stop military action against extremist groups in the region.
If approved, the deal between the 17 countries comprising the International Syria Support Group (ISSG) would mark the first diplomatic breakthrough in the conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions more since it began in 2011. The cessation is set to commence if it is granted "confirmation by the Syrian government and opposition, following appropriate consultations in Syria," the United Nations said on Thursday.
However, a cessation of hostilities does not provide the same guarantees as a formal ceasefire, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry admitted the deal amounted to "commitments on paper" only.
The cessation also allows for continued airstrikes against the Islamic State (ISIS) and the Al-Qaeda affiliate group Nusra Front, a provision of the deal that Syrian civilian advocates called "absurd."
Sustained delivery of humanitarian aid "will begin this week, first to the areas where it is most urgently needed... and then to all the people in need throughout the country, particularly in the besieged and hard to reach areas," said Kerry, who announced the deal after extended talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
As the Guardian pointed out on Friday, the deal is predicated on trust between all sides in the conflict--and trust is in short supply. Middle East editor Ian Black writes:
Not only is a cessation of hostilities less solid than a formal ceasefire, there is also no provision for monitoring or enforcement.
[...] Mainstream rebel groups fear that, whatever nomenclature is used, a commitment to end violence is being 'de-linked' from the negotiations they insist are necessary to bring about a political transition and, crucially, to remove Assad.
The next week will give new perspective on how to proceed with ongoing peace negotiations, diplomats and opposition leaders said on Friday.
"If we see action and implementation on the ground, we will be soon in Geneva," said Salim al-Muslat, an opposition spokesperson.
Meanwhile, human rights organizations said they were eager to start sending in humanitarian aid to the areas where it is urgently needed.
"We have high hopes that the parties in the International Syria Support Group, including Russia and the United States, will do everything they can to push for humanitarian access to civilians in need inside Syria," said Jan Egeland, the head of the Norwegian Refugee Council. "This could be the breakthrough we have been waiting for to get full access to desperate civilians inside Syria. But it requires that all those with influence on all sides of the conflict are putting pressure the parties."
The UN said the humanitarian crisis in Syria has reached "grotesque" proportions.
"The peace talks in Geneva must be resumed as early as possible," said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein. "It is unconscionable that the various parties cannot even manage to sit around the table, when, because of their actions, more than a quarter of a million people have died, and the rest of the population is suffering to such a degree. A lasting peaceful resolution of this horrific war must be built on a solid foundation of human rights."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
World powers on Friday agreed to a plan for a "cessation of hostilities" in Syria, to begin next week, which would allow humanitarian aid to reach besieged civilians but would not stop military action against extremist groups in the region.
If approved, the deal between the 17 countries comprising the International Syria Support Group (ISSG) would mark the first diplomatic breakthrough in the conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions more since it began in 2011. The cessation is set to commence if it is granted "confirmation by the Syrian government and opposition, following appropriate consultations in Syria," the United Nations said on Thursday.
However, a cessation of hostilities does not provide the same guarantees as a formal ceasefire, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry admitted the deal amounted to "commitments on paper" only.
The cessation also allows for continued airstrikes against the Islamic State (ISIS) and the Al-Qaeda affiliate group Nusra Front, a provision of the deal that Syrian civilian advocates called "absurd."
Sustained delivery of humanitarian aid "will begin this week, first to the areas where it is most urgently needed... and then to all the people in need throughout the country, particularly in the besieged and hard to reach areas," said Kerry, who announced the deal after extended talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
As the Guardian pointed out on Friday, the deal is predicated on trust between all sides in the conflict--and trust is in short supply. Middle East editor Ian Black writes:
Not only is a cessation of hostilities less solid than a formal ceasefire, there is also no provision for monitoring or enforcement.
[...] Mainstream rebel groups fear that, whatever nomenclature is used, a commitment to end violence is being 'de-linked' from the negotiations they insist are necessary to bring about a political transition and, crucially, to remove Assad.
The next week will give new perspective on how to proceed with ongoing peace negotiations, diplomats and opposition leaders said on Friday.
"If we see action and implementation on the ground, we will be soon in Geneva," said Salim al-Muslat, an opposition spokesperson.
Meanwhile, human rights organizations said they were eager to start sending in humanitarian aid to the areas where it is urgently needed.
"We have high hopes that the parties in the International Syria Support Group, including Russia and the United States, will do everything they can to push for humanitarian access to civilians in need inside Syria," said Jan Egeland, the head of the Norwegian Refugee Council. "This could be the breakthrough we have been waiting for to get full access to desperate civilians inside Syria. But it requires that all those with influence on all sides of the conflict are putting pressure the parties."
The UN said the humanitarian crisis in Syria has reached "grotesque" proportions.
"The peace talks in Geneva must be resumed as early as possible," said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein. "It is unconscionable that the various parties cannot even manage to sit around the table, when, because of their actions, more than a quarter of a million people have died, and the rest of the population is suffering to such a degree. A lasting peaceful resolution of this horrific war must be built on a solid foundation of human rights."
World powers on Friday agreed to a plan for a "cessation of hostilities" in Syria, to begin next week, which would allow humanitarian aid to reach besieged civilians but would not stop military action against extremist groups in the region.
If approved, the deal between the 17 countries comprising the International Syria Support Group (ISSG) would mark the first diplomatic breakthrough in the conflict that has killed hundreds of thousands and displaced millions more since it began in 2011. The cessation is set to commence if it is granted "confirmation by the Syrian government and opposition, following appropriate consultations in Syria," the United Nations said on Thursday.
However, a cessation of hostilities does not provide the same guarantees as a formal ceasefire, and U.S. Secretary of State John Kerry admitted the deal amounted to "commitments on paper" only.
The cessation also allows for continued airstrikes against the Islamic State (ISIS) and the Al-Qaeda affiliate group Nusra Front, a provision of the deal that Syrian civilian advocates called "absurd."
Sustained delivery of humanitarian aid "will begin this week, first to the areas where it is most urgently needed... and then to all the people in need throughout the country, particularly in the besieged and hard to reach areas," said Kerry, who announced the deal after extended talks with Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov.
As the Guardian pointed out on Friday, the deal is predicated on trust between all sides in the conflict--and trust is in short supply. Middle East editor Ian Black writes:
Not only is a cessation of hostilities less solid than a formal ceasefire, there is also no provision for monitoring or enforcement.
[...] Mainstream rebel groups fear that, whatever nomenclature is used, a commitment to end violence is being 'de-linked' from the negotiations they insist are necessary to bring about a political transition and, crucially, to remove Assad.
The next week will give new perspective on how to proceed with ongoing peace negotiations, diplomats and opposition leaders said on Friday.
"If we see action and implementation on the ground, we will be soon in Geneva," said Salim al-Muslat, an opposition spokesperson.
Meanwhile, human rights organizations said they were eager to start sending in humanitarian aid to the areas where it is urgently needed.
"We have high hopes that the parties in the International Syria Support Group, including Russia and the United States, will do everything they can to push for humanitarian access to civilians in need inside Syria," said Jan Egeland, the head of the Norwegian Refugee Council. "This could be the breakthrough we have been waiting for to get full access to desperate civilians inside Syria. But it requires that all those with influence on all sides of the conflict are putting pressure the parties."
The UN said the humanitarian crisis in Syria has reached "grotesque" proportions.
"The peace talks in Geneva must be resumed as early as possible," said the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights, Zeid Ra'ad Al Hussein. "It is unconscionable that the various parties cannot even manage to sit around the table, when, because of their actions, more than a quarter of a million people have died, and the rest of the population is suffering to such a degree. A lasting peaceful resolution of this horrific war must be built on a solid foundation of human rights."