SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A Whole Foods Market in Austin, Texas. (Photo: That Other Paper/cc/flickr)
The Whole Foods grocery chain--dogged by its "Whole Paycheck" pricing reputation--on Monday announced it would pay $500,000 to the city of New York to settle against allegations that it overcharged customers.
An investigation launched earlier this year by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) found that Whole Foods had "routinely overstated the weights of its pre-packaged products--including meats, dairy and baked goods--resulting in customers being overcharged."
According to the DCA, the overcharges ranged from $0.80 for a package of pecan panko to $14.84 for a package of coconut shrimp.
The ongoing investigation had sought $1.5 million in reparations, but the grocer agreed to $500,000 "to put this issue behind us."
In a statement Monday, DCA Commissioner Julie Menin applauded the agreement.
"After discovering the troubling and repeated mislabeling of pre-packaged goods at Whole Foods last year, we are happy to have reached an agreement with Whole Foods that will help to ensure New Yorkers are better protected from overcharging," Menin said.
And while the company denies any wrongdoing, pointing to its third party audit system for pricing accuracy, it is possible that the price-gouging is occurring at locations across the country.
Last year, the company paid $800,000 in fines after a separate investigation into alleged pricing irregularities in California.
And as economist Richard Wolff noted Tuesday, the fine amounts to but a third of a cent per one dollar of sales for the retail giant. In other words, he said: "Great for them, not customers."
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The Whole Foods grocery chain--dogged by its "Whole Paycheck" pricing reputation--on Monday announced it would pay $500,000 to the city of New York to settle against allegations that it overcharged customers.
An investigation launched earlier this year by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) found that Whole Foods had "routinely overstated the weights of its pre-packaged products--including meats, dairy and baked goods--resulting in customers being overcharged."
According to the DCA, the overcharges ranged from $0.80 for a package of pecan panko to $14.84 for a package of coconut shrimp.
The ongoing investigation had sought $1.5 million in reparations, but the grocer agreed to $500,000 "to put this issue behind us."
In a statement Monday, DCA Commissioner Julie Menin applauded the agreement.
"After discovering the troubling and repeated mislabeling of pre-packaged goods at Whole Foods last year, we are happy to have reached an agreement with Whole Foods that will help to ensure New Yorkers are better protected from overcharging," Menin said.
And while the company denies any wrongdoing, pointing to its third party audit system for pricing accuracy, it is possible that the price-gouging is occurring at locations across the country.
Last year, the company paid $800,000 in fines after a separate investigation into alleged pricing irregularities in California.
And as economist Richard Wolff noted Tuesday, the fine amounts to but a third of a cent per one dollar of sales for the retail giant. In other words, he said: "Great for them, not customers."
The Whole Foods grocery chain--dogged by its "Whole Paycheck" pricing reputation--on Monday announced it would pay $500,000 to the city of New York to settle against allegations that it overcharged customers.
An investigation launched earlier this year by the New York City Department of Consumer Affairs (DCA) found that Whole Foods had "routinely overstated the weights of its pre-packaged products--including meats, dairy and baked goods--resulting in customers being overcharged."
According to the DCA, the overcharges ranged from $0.80 for a package of pecan panko to $14.84 for a package of coconut shrimp.
The ongoing investigation had sought $1.5 million in reparations, but the grocer agreed to $500,000 "to put this issue behind us."
In a statement Monday, DCA Commissioner Julie Menin applauded the agreement.
"After discovering the troubling and repeated mislabeling of pre-packaged goods at Whole Foods last year, we are happy to have reached an agreement with Whole Foods that will help to ensure New Yorkers are better protected from overcharging," Menin said.
And while the company denies any wrongdoing, pointing to its third party audit system for pricing accuracy, it is possible that the price-gouging is occurring at locations across the country.
Last year, the company paid $800,000 in fines after a separate investigation into alleged pricing irregularities in California.
And as economist Richard Wolff noted Tuesday, the fine amounts to but a third of a cent per one dollar of sales for the retail giant. In other words, he said: "Great for them, not customers."