SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Australia is looking for corporate sponsors to pay for conservation efforts, even as the government approves yet more coal development projects. (Photo: FarbenfroheWunderwelt/flickr/cc)
Allowing Corporate Sponsorship of Great Barrier Reef Likened to Naming Hospital After Tobacco Company
Opponents slam Australian government's controversial new initiative for reef conservation
Dec 16, 2015
Australia is seeking corporate sponsors to fund a new Great Barrier Reef conservation initiative, sparking fears that big companies could invest in the endangered marine site to 'greenwash' their poor environmental track records.
The world's biggest coral reef is facing increasing dangers stemming from climate change, including a historic global coral bleaching event driven by warming oceans. But environmental conservationists, including members of the Australia Greens party, say corporate sponsorship is no solution to the crisis.
"The most alarming part of this proposal is the potential for companies which are threatening the reef to buy positive reef branding to try to avert the reputational damage they deserve," Greens Senator Larissa Waters said on Wednesday, pointing out that the Australian government had also just given the green light to energy giant Adani to build the country's largest coal mine, ignoring widespread scientific opposition.
"It's a bit rich for the government to be cooking the reef with its coal obsession, and then wanting rich individuals to bail it out," she said, adding that the government should be using its own money to protect the marine site rather than looking for private investments.
Allowing coal companies to sponsor the Great Barrier Reef "would be like letting tobacco companies sponsor hospitals," Waters added.
In a federal brochure entitled "Partnerships for the Reef," the government-backed Reef Trust said it was looking for sponsorship, joint investments, and "collaborative arrangements." Among the projects are $1 million to improve seabird habitats, $1.5 million over three years to restore highly polluted riverbanks, and $7 million over three years to protect against coral loss from crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks.
"All Reef Trust investments will be recognised in branding of project materials, ranging from online publications and reports to social media activities and reef events," the brochure states.
To that idea, Waters countered, "While private donations for reef protection are welcome they shouldn't be in exchange for advertising rights and they must be on top of adequate public funding, not in place of it. What's next, naming rights, like for football stadiums?"
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Australia is seeking corporate sponsors to fund a new Great Barrier Reef conservation initiative, sparking fears that big companies could invest in the endangered marine site to 'greenwash' their poor environmental track records.
The world's biggest coral reef is facing increasing dangers stemming from climate change, including a historic global coral bleaching event driven by warming oceans. But environmental conservationists, including members of the Australia Greens party, say corporate sponsorship is no solution to the crisis.
"The most alarming part of this proposal is the potential for companies which are threatening the reef to buy positive reef branding to try to avert the reputational damage they deserve," Greens Senator Larissa Waters said on Wednesday, pointing out that the Australian government had also just given the green light to energy giant Adani to build the country's largest coal mine, ignoring widespread scientific opposition.
"It's a bit rich for the government to be cooking the reef with its coal obsession, and then wanting rich individuals to bail it out," she said, adding that the government should be using its own money to protect the marine site rather than looking for private investments.
Allowing coal companies to sponsor the Great Barrier Reef "would be like letting tobacco companies sponsor hospitals," Waters added.
In a federal brochure entitled "Partnerships for the Reef," the government-backed Reef Trust said it was looking for sponsorship, joint investments, and "collaborative arrangements." Among the projects are $1 million to improve seabird habitats, $1.5 million over three years to restore highly polluted riverbanks, and $7 million over three years to protect against coral loss from crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks.
"All Reef Trust investments will be recognised in branding of project materials, ranging from online publications and reports to social media activities and reef events," the brochure states.
To that idea, Waters countered, "While private donations for reef protection are welcome they shouldn't be in exchange for advertising rights and they must be on top of adequate public funding, not in place of it. What's next, naming rights, like for football stadiums?"
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Australia is seeking corporate sponsors to fund a new Great Barrier Reef conservation initiative, sparking fears that big companies could invest in the endangered marine site to 'greenwash' their poor environmental track records.
The world's biggest coral reef is facing increasing dangers stemming from climate change, including a historic global coral bleaching event driven by warming oceans. But environmental conservationists, including members of the Australia Greens party, say corporate sponsorship is no solution to the crisis.
"The most alarming part of this proposal is the potential for companies which are threatening the reef to buy positive reef branding to try to avert the reputational damage they deserve," Greens Senator Larissa Waters said on Wednesday, pointing out that the Australian government had also just given the green light to energy giant Adani to build the country's largest coal mine, ignoring widespread scientific opposition.
"It's a bit rich for the government to be cooking the reef with its coal obsession, and then wanting rich individuals to bail it out," she said, adding that the government should be using its own money to protect the marine site rather than looking for private investments.
Allowing coal companies to sponsor the Great Barrier Reef "would be like letting tobacco companies sponsor hospitals," Waters added.
In a federal brochure entitled "Partnerships for the Reef," the government-backed Reef Trust said it was looking for sponsorship, joint investments, and "collaborative arrangements." Among the projects are $1 million to improve seabird habitats, $1.5 million over three years to restore highly polluted riverbanks, and $7 million over three years to protect against coral loss from crown-of-thorns starfish outbreaks.
"All Reef Trust investments will be recognised in branding of project materials, ranging from online publications and reports to social media activities and reef events," the brochure states.
To that idea, Waters countered, "While private donations for reef protection are welcome they shouldn't be in exchange for advertising rights and they must be on top of adequate public funding, not in place of it. What's next, naming rights, like for football stadiums?"
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.