Comey Under Fire for Incendiary 'Ferguson Effect' Claims
As nation reels from latest incident of officer violence gone viral, FBI Director's comments called 'damaging' to police, community relations
As President Obama spoke Tuesday to an international conference of police chiefs and the nation reeled from the latest incident of police violence gone viral, FBI director James Comey has come under renewed fire for further driving a wedge between law enforcement and the communities they are supposed to serve.
Comey on Friday and again Monday repeated the assertion that the unrest, protests, and increased scrutiny on police following the recent killings of black civilians was driving a spike in violent crime, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the "Ferguson effect."
"In today's YouTube world, are officers reluctant to get out of their cars and do the work that controls violent crime? Are officers answering 911 calls but avoiding the informal contact that keeps bad guys from standing around, especially with guns?" he asked in his Friday remarks at the University of Chicago Law School. "I don't know whether this explains it entirely, but I do have a strong sense that some part of the explanation is a chill wind blowing through American law enforcement over the last year. And that wind is surely changing behavior."
The White House swiftly rebuffed these claims. And Comey's stance was flipped on its head a day later when a police officer's attack on a black female student drew national outrage after a number of cell phone videos of the incident went viral.
Author and Atlantic columnist Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote Tuesday that Comey's own admission that his comments were not based on fact is part of a legacy of "creationist-style crime control" which has taken "a special and discriminating interest in black communities." Coates cites a number of historic myths about black criminals: "'they're raping our women' to 'negro cocaine fiends,' to 'crack babies,'...and now to 'the Ferguson Effect.'"
Coates added that Comey's reasoning has dangerous implications that extend beyond the black community. "A theory of government which tells citizens to invest agents of the state with the power to mete out lethal violence, but discourages them from holding those officers accountable is not democracy," he writes. "It is fascism."
An editorial published Monday in the Baltimore Sun--a city which was also rocked with protests following the police killing of Freddie Gray--rebuked Comey's "Ferguson effect" claim, noting "the theory is a damaging one to advance, as it only underscores the disconnect between police and the communities they are supposed to serve."
Further, the Sun argues that saying police are subdued by the threat of a viral video "suggests officers have no idea about what has brought us to this point," and are thus even further detached from the civilian population.
"The issue is not officers doing their jobs in an energetic, proactive way," the editorial states. "The issue is the use of force when it's not needed, the violation of civil rights and the general dehumanization of people who live in high crime areas, usually African Americans."
Against this backdrop, President Obama on Tuesday gave an address to the International Association of Chiefs of Police in Chicago during which he told the officers that they can't "cherry-pick" crime data, in what appeared to be a reference to Comey's claims.
"We do have to stick with the facts," the president said. "What we can't do is cherry-pick data or use anecdotal evidence to drive policy." He added that violent crime rates this year appeared to be nearly as low as last year.
The president also attempted to strike a tone of appreciation and common ground with the assembled officers, saying the broader social inequities and failures within the justice system should not be left for police to bear alone.
"Too often, law enforcement gets scapegoated for the broader failures of our society and criminal justice system," Obama stated in his prepared remarks.
"I know that you do your jobs with distinction no matter the challenges you face. That's part of wearing the badge," he continued. "But we can't expect you to contain and control problems that the rest of us aren't willing to face or do anything about."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just two days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
As President Obama spoke Tuesday to an international conference of police chiefs and the nation reeled from the latest incident of police violence gone viral, FBI director James Comey has come under renewed fire for further driving a wedge between law enforcement and the communities they are supposed to serve.
Comey on Friday and again Monday repeated the assertion that the unrest, protests, and increased scrutiny on police following the recent killings of black civilians was driving a spike in violent crime, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the "Ferguson effect."
"In today's YouTube world, are officers reluctant to get out of their cars and do the work that controls violent crime? Are officers answering 911 calls but avoiding the informal contact that keeps bad guys from standing around, especially with guns?" he asked in his Friday remarks at the University of Chicago Law School. "I don't know whether this explains it entirely, but I do have a strong sense that some part of the explanation is a chill wind blowing through American law enforcement over the last year. And that wind is surely changing behavior."
The White House swiftly rebuffed these claims. And Comey's stance was flipped on its head a day later when a police officer's attack on a black female student drew national outrage after a number of cell phone videos of the incident went viral.
Author and Atlantic columnist Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote Tuesday that Comey's own admission that his comments were not based on fact is part of a legacy of "creationist-style crime control" which has taken "a special and discriminating interest in black communities." Coates cites a number of historic myths about black criminals: "'they're raping our women' to 'negro cocaine fiends,' to 'crack babies,'...and now to 'the Ferguson Effect.'"
Coates added that Comey's reasoning has dangerous implications that extend beyond the black community. "A theory of government which tells citizens to invest agents of the state with the power to mete out lethal violence, but discourages them from holding those officers accountable is not democracy," he writes. "It is fascism."
An editorial published Monday in the Baltimore Sun--a city which was also rocked with protests following the police killing of Freddie Gray--rebuked Comey's "Ferguson effect" claim, noting "the theory is a damaging one to advance, as it only underscores the disconnect between police and the communities they are supposed to serve."
Further, the Sun argues that saying police are subdued by the threat of a viral video "suggests officers have no idea about what has brought us to this point," and are thus even further detached from the civilian population.
"The issue is not officers doing their jobs in an energetic, proactive way," the editorial states. "The issue is the use of force when it's not needed, the violation of civil rights and the general dehumanization of people who live in high crime areas, usually African Americans."
Against this backdrop, President Obama on Tuesday gave an address to the International Association of Chiefs of Police in Chicago during which he told the officers that they can't "cherry-pick" crime data, in what appeared to be a reference to Comey's claims.
"We do have to stick with the facts," the president said. "What we can't do is cherry-pick data or use anecdotal evidence to drive policy." He added that violent crime rates this year appeared to be nearly as low as last year.
The president also attempted to strike a tone of appreciation and common ground with the assembled officers, saying the broader social inequities and failures within the justice system should not be left for police to bear alone.
"Too often, law enforcement gets scapegoated for the broader failures of our society and criminal justice system," Obama stated in his prepared remarks.
"I know that you do your jobs with distinction no matter the challenges you face. That's part of wearing the badge," he continued. "But we can't expect you to contain and control problems that the rest of us aren't willing to face or do anything about."
As President Obama spoke Tuesday to an international conference of police chiefs and the nation reeled from the latest incident of police violence gone viral, FBI director James Comey has come under renewed fire for further driving a wedge between law enforcement and the communities they are supposed to serve.
Comey on Friday and again Monday repeated the assertion that the unrest, protests, and increased scrutiny on police following the recent killings of black civilians was driving a spike in violent crime, a phenomenon that has been dubbed the "Ferguson effect."
"In today's YouTube world, are officers reluctant to get out of their cars and do the work that controls violent crime? Are officers answering 911 calls but avoiding the informal contact that keeps bad guys from standing around, especially with guns?" he asked in his Friday remarks at the University of Chicago Law School. "I don't know whether this explains it entirely, but I do have a strong sense that some part of the explanation is a chill wind blowing through American law enforcement over the last year. And that wind is surely changing behavior."
The White House swiftly rebuffed these claims. And Comey's stance was flipped on its head a day later when a police officer's attack on a black female student drew national outrage after a number of cell phone videos of the incident went viral.
Author and Atlantic columnist Ta-Nehisi Coates wrote Tuesday that Comey's own admission that his comments were not based on fact is part of a legacy of "creationist-style crime control" which has taken "a special and discriminating interest in black communities." Coates cites a number of historic myths about black criminals: "'they're raping our women' to 'negro cocaine fiends,' to 'crack babies,'...and now to 'the Ferguson Effect.'"
Coates added that Comey's reasoning has dangerous implications that extend beyond the black community. "A theory of government which tells citizens to invest agents of the state with the power to mete out lethal violence, but discourages them from holding those officers accountable is not democracy," he writes. "It is fascism."
An editorial published Monday in the Baltimore Sun--a city which was also rocked with protests following the police killing of Freddie Gray--rebuked Comey's "Ferguson effect" claim, noting "the theory is a damaging one to advance, as it only underscores the disconnect between police and the communities they are supposed to serve."
Further, the Sun argues that saying police are subdued by the threat of a viral video "suggests officers have no idea about what has brought us to this point," and are thus even further detached from the civilian population.
"The issue is not officers doing their jobs in an energetic, proactive way," the editorial states. "The issue is the use of force when it's not needed, the violation of civil rights and the general dehumanization of people who live in high crime areas, usually African Americans."
Against this backdrop, President Obama on Tuesday gave an address to the International Association of Chiefs of Police in Chicago during which he told the officers that they can't "cherry-pick" crime data, in what appeared to be a reference to Comey's claims.
"We do have to stick with the facts," the president said. "What we can't do is cherry-pick data or use anecdotal evidence to drive policy." He added that violent crime rates this year appeared to be nearly as low as last year.
The president also attempted to strike a tone of appreciation and common ground with the assembled officers, saying the broader social inequities and failures within the justice system should not be left for police to bear alone.
"Too often, law enforcement gets scapegoated for the broader failures of our society and criminal justice system," Obama stated in his prepared remarks.
"I know that you do your jobs with distinction no matter the challenges you face. That's part of wearing the badge," he continued. "But we can't expect you to contain and control problems that the rest of us aren't willing to face or do anything about."


