India Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg met in California on Sunday. (Screenshot)
Sep 29, 2015
While tech giants praised a high-profile meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in Menlo Park, California on Sunday, net neutrality advocates took the occasion to criticize Facebook's controversial venture into internet access for developing countries.
Facebook recently rebranded its Internet.org initiative after receiving backlash from consumer advocates who said it violated net neutrality rules by only allowing users free access to a small number of curated websites, including Facebook.
Despite renaming the venture to Free Basics, criticism of the program--which has launched in 18 countries--remains strong.
Even with a shift away from its misleading philanthropic title, the program's aims remain disingenuous. "Facebook has finally stopped trying to pretend that this is an effort at philanthropy by correctly calling it FreeBasics.com by Facebook and not internet.org which neither had the internet nor the org," Mishi Choudhary, executive director of the India-based Software Freedom Law Center, said on Tuesday.
"In countries like India, [net neutrality] is more about cost of access than speed of access: all lanes are slow," Choudhary said.
As The Hindupointed out on Tuesday, not one question during Zuckerberg and Modi's 45-minute Q&A broached the topic of net neutrality.
Critics have also noted that by routing online traffic through partner organizations, Facebook would be able to sweep up user data and give itself ownership over images and videos posted through the program.
That means "the poor will be comprehensively surveilled by Facebook, losing any shred of personal privacy, while the rich using the real Internet do not route all their traffic through Facebook," Choudhary said.
As the LA Timesexplains:
In India, while more than 8 million are gaining Internet access every month, more than 800 million people are still without it, according to industry figures. With Facebook under constant pressure to show it can grow beyond its 1.5 billion worldwide users, India represents a potential gold mine - which perhaps explains why Zuckerberg has aggressively courted Modi since the Indian leader took office in May 2014.
Moreover, according to Facebook's own data, only 20 percent of Free Basics users in India are reaching the web for the first time, which contradicts the company's claims that the venture aims to provide service to communities without internet access.
As Hrush Bhatt, founder of Cleartrip.org--a travel company that pulled its partnership from Internet.org following the net neutrality backlash--told the LA Times on Monday, "It's disingenuous for Facebook to do this in the name of providing connectivity."
"If they really want to provide connectivity, why not give out phones or provide subsidies for data plans?" Bhatt said.
Choudhary continued, "The poor deserve the same sanitation, health care, drinking water, primary and secondary education, and network communications as the rich... Fair regulatory pricing of telecommunications tariffs in India would allow the Indian poor access to data service, as they now have access to mobile telephony, at prices they can afford."
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
While tech giants praised a high-profile meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in Menlo Park, California on Sunday, net neutrality advocates took the occasion to criticize Facebook's controversial venture into internet access for developing countries.
Facebook recently rebranded its Internet.org initiative after receiving backlash from consumer advocates who said it violated net neutrality rules by only allowing users free access to a small number of curated websites, including Facebook.
Despite renaming the venture to Free Basics, criticism of the program--which has launched in 18 countries--remains strong.
Even with a shift away from its misleading philanthropic title, the program's aims remain disingenuous. "Facebook has finally stopped trying to pretend that this is an effort at philanthropy by correctly calling it FreeBasics.com by Facebook and not internet.org which neither had the internet nor the org," Mishi Choudhary, executive director of the India-based Software Freedom Law Center, said on Tuesday.
"In countries like India, [net neutrality] is more about cost of access than speed of access: all lanes are slow," Choudhary said.
As The Hindupointed out on Tuesday, not one question during Zuckerberg and Modi's 45-minute Q&A broached the topic of net neutrality.
Critics have also noted that by routing online traffic through partner organizations, Facebook would be able to sweep up user data and give itself ownership over images and videos posted through the program.
That means "the poor will be comprehensively surveilled by Facebook, losing any shred of personal privacy, while the rich using the real Internet do not route all their traffic through Facebook," Choudhary said.
As the LA Timesexplains:
In India, while more than 8 million are gaining Internet access every month, more than 800 million people are still without it, according to industry figures. With Facebook under constant pressure to show it can grow beyond its 1.5 billion worldwide users, India represents a potential gold mine - which perhaps explains why Zuckerberg has aggressively courted Modi since the Indian leader took office in May 2014.
Moreover, according to Facebook's own data, only 20 percent of Free Basics users in India are reaching the web for the first time, which contradicts the company's claims that the venture aims to provide service to communities without internet access.
As Hrush Bhatt, founder of Cleartrip.org--a travel company that pulled its partnership from Internet.org following the net neutrality backlash--told the LA Times on Monday, "It's disingenuous for Facebook to do this in the name of providing connectivity."
"If they really want to provide connectivity, why not give out phones or provide subsidies for data plans?" Bhatt said.
Choudhary continued, "The poor deserve the same sanitation, health care, drinking water, primary and secondary education, and network communications as the rich... Fair regulatory pricing of telecommunications tariffs in India would allow the Indian poor access to data service, as they now have access to mobile telephony, at prices they can afford."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
While tech giants praised a high-profile meeting between Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Facebook founder Mark Zuckerberg in Menlo Park, California on Sunday, net neutrality advocates took the occasion to criticize Facebook's controversial venture into internet access for developing countries.
Facebook recently rebranded its Internet.org initiative after receiving backlash from consumer advocates who said it violated net neutrality rules by only allowing users free access to a small number of curated websites, including Facebook.
Despite renaming the venture to Free Basics, criticism of the program--which has launched in 18 countries--remains strong.
Even with a shift away from its misleading philanthropic title, the program's aims remain disingenuous. "Facebook has finally stopped trying to pretend that this is an effort at philanthropy by correctly calling it FreeBasics.com by Facebook and not internet.org which neither had the internet nor the org," Mishi Choudhary, executive director of the India-based Software Freedom Law Center, said on Tuesday.
"In countries like India, [net neutrality] is more about cost of access than speed of access: all lanes are slow," Choudhary said.
As The Hindupointed out on Tuesday, not one question during Zuckerberg and Modi's 45-minute Q&A broached the topic of net neutrality.
Critics have also noted that by routing online traffic through partner organizations, Facebook would be able to sweep up user data and give itself ownership over images and videos posted through the program.
That means "the poor will be comprehensively surveilled by Facebook, losing any shred of personal privacy, while the rich using the real Internet do not route all their traffic through Facebook," Choudhary said.
As the LA Timesexplains:
In India, while more than 8 million are gaining Internet access every month, more than 800 million people are still without it, according to industry figures. With Facebook under constant pressure to show it can grow beyond its 1.5 billion worldwide users, India represents a potential gold mine - which perhaps explains why Zuckerberg has aggressively courted Modi since the Indian leader took office in May 2014.
Moreover, according to Facebook's own data, only 20 percent of Free Basics users in India are reaching the web for the first time, which contradicts the company's claims that the venture aims to provide service to communities without internet access.
As Hrush Bhatt, founder of Cleartrip.org--a travel company that pulled its partnership from Internet.org following the net neutrality backlash--told the LA Times on Monday, "It's disingenuous for Facebook to do this in the name of providing connectivity."
"If they really want to provide connectivity, why not give out phones or provide subsidies for data plans?" Bhatt said.
Choudhary continued, "The poor deserve the same sanitation, health care, drinking water, primary and secondary education, and network communications as the rich... Fair regulatory pricing of telecommunications tariffs in India would allow the Indian poor access to data service, as they now have access to mobile telephony, at prices they can afford."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.