SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To Defend Rights and Set Precedent, First Nation Targets Logging Plan
'It saddens me that we are forced to fight in court to protect our children from the dangerous impacts of clear-cut logging,' says Grassy Narrows chief
Sep 14, 2015
Hoping to set a precedent on Indigenous peoples and environmental rights, the Grassy Narrows First Nation is heading to court on Monday in a legal bid to stop Ontario's plan to allow clear-cutting near the community's traditional territory.
The Canadian tribe says a proposed forest management plan, which would see clear-cutting of about 50,000 hectares of the Whiskey Jack Forest, would "prolong and deepen the ongoing tragedy of mercury poisoning" in local waterways, thereby violating their "rights to security and freedom from discrimination," according to a press statement.
The case could become the first to successfully use the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to protect people against harm and discrimination arising from environmental degradation.
"We're trying to protect our people's health here, our fundamental human rights," Chief Roger Fobister told CBC News.
"It saddens me that we are forced to fight in court to protect our children from the dangerous mercury impacts of clear-cut logging," Fobister added in a statement. "I hope that the court will finally end Ontario's long legacy of forcing harmful decisions on our families and our homeland."
Research shows (pdf) that clear-cutting can release methylmercury--a neurotoxin--into the environment.
What's more, many of the lakes and rivers in areas where logging will take place already face fish consumption restrictions due to the past industrial dumping of mercury.
In late August, the Grassy Narrows First Nation declared a state of emergency due to a prolonged lack of access to safe drinking water.
And in June, 50 years after a nearby pulp mill dumped its effluent into a northern Ontario watershed, a study commissioned by the provincial government and the Grassy Narrows First Nation showed that mercury continues to rise in some lakes where the people of Grassy Narrows continue to catch and eat fish.
"When I was pregnant I couldn't afford to buy food at the store, so I ate what my grandfather brought home--mostly fish," said Grassy Narrows mother Sherry Fobister, an applicant in the lawsuit. "Now I cry because I fear that my daughter may suffer for her whole life. She deserves to live a good life and be happy. This pain is never going to end if Ontario allows clear-cut logging to add even more mercury into our river."
Despite abundant evidence, Ontario refused Grassy Narrows' request for an individual environmental assessment of the impacts of clear-cut logging on the health of the community, its waterways, and its fish. In fact, the 1,200-page logging plan approved by Ontario does not even contain the word 'mercury.'
It it with all this mind that the community filed its lawsuit.
"We are asking the court to intervene to ensure that the basic rights of all Canadians, including the right to be safe from harm imposed by the government and the right to be free of discrimination, are finally upheld in Grassy Narrows," said Joseph Castrilli, legal counsel at the Canadian Environmental Law Association, which is representing the tribe. "Our clients believe that the members of Grassy Narrows have endured far too much harm and, therefore, are owed the highest degree of precaution and environmental justice."
Clear-cut logging under the plan could begin on Grassy Narrows' homeland as soon as 2016.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Hoping to set a precedent on Indigenous peoples and environmental rights, the Grassy Narrows First Nation is heading to court on Monday in a legal bid to stop Ontario's plan to allow clear-cutting near the community's traditional territory.
The Canadian tribe says a proposed forest management plan, which would see clear-cutting of about 50,000 hectares of the Whiskey Jack Forest, would "prolong and deepen the ongoing tragedy of mercury poisoning" in local waterways, thereby violating their "rights to security and freedom from discrimination," according to a press statement.
The case could become the first to successfully use the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to protect people against harm and discrimination arising from environmental degradation.
"We're trying to protect our people's health here, our fundamental human rights," Chief Roger Fobister told CBC News.
"It saddens me that we are forced to fight in court to protect our children from the dangerous mercury impacts of clear-cut logging," Fobister added in a statement. "I hope that the court will finally end Ontario's long legacy of forcing harmful decisions on our families and our homeland."
Research shows (pdf) that clear-cutting can release methylmercury--a neurotoxin--into the environment.
What's more, many of the lakes and rivers in areas where logging will take place already face fish consumption restrictions due to the past industrial dumping of mercury.
In late August, the Grassy Narrows First Nation declared a state of emergency due to a prolonged lack of access to safe drinking water.
And in June, 50 years after a nearby pulp mill dumped its effluent into a northern Ontario watershed, a study commissioned by the provincial government and the Grassy Narrows First Nation showed that mercury continues to rise in some lakes where the people of Grassy Narrows continue to catch and eat fish.
"When I was pregnant I couldn't afford to buy food at the store, so I ate what my grandfather brought home--mostly fish," said Grassy Narrows mother Sherry Fobister, an applicant in the lawsuit. "Now I cry because I fear that my daughter may suffer for her whole life. She deserves to live a good life and be happy. This pain is never going to end if Ontario allows clear-cut logging to add even more mercury into our river."
Despite abundant evidence, Ontario refused Grassy Narrows' request for an individual environmental assessment of the impacts of clear-cut logging on the health of the community, its waterways, and its fish. In fact, the 1,200-page logging plan approved by Ontario does not even contain the word 'mercury.'
It it with all this mind that the community filed its lawsuit.
"We are asking the court to intervene to ensure that the basic rights of all Canadians, including the right to be safe from harm imposed by the government and the right to be free of discrimination, are finally upheld in Grassy Narrows," said Joseph Castrilli, legal counsel at the Canadian Environmental Law Association, which is representing the tribe. "Our clients believe that the members of Grassy Narrows have endured far too much harm and, therefore, are owed the highest degree of precaution and environmental justice."
Clear-cut logging under the plan could begin on Grassy Narrows' homeland as soon as 2016.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Hoping to set a precedent on Indigenous peoples and environmental rights, the Grassy Narrows First Nation is heading to court on Monday in a legal bid to stop Ontario's plan to allow clear-cutting near the community's traditional territory.
The Canadian tribe says a proposed forest management plan, which would see clear-cutting of about 50,000 hectares of the Whiskey Jack Forest, would "prolong and deepen the ongoing tragedy of mercury poisoning" in local waterways, thereby violating their "rights to security and freedom from discrimination," according to a press statement.
The case could become the first to successfully use the Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms to protect people against harm and discrimination arising from environmental degradation.
"We're trying to protect our people's health here, our fundamental human rights," Chief Roger Fobister told CBC News.
"It saddens me that we are forced to fight in court to protect our children from the dangerous mercury impacts of clear-cut logging," Fobister added in a statement. "I hope that the court will finally end Ontario's long legacy of forcing harmful decisions on our families and our homeland."
Research shows (pdf) that clear-cutting can release methylmercury--a neurotoxin--into the environment.
What's more, many of the lakes and rivers in areas where logging will take place already face fish consumption restrictions due to the past industrial dumping of mercury.
In late August, the Grassy Narrows First Nation declared a state of emergency due to a prolonged lack of access to safe drinking water.
And in June, 50 years after a nearby pulp mill dumped its effluent into a northern Ontario watershed, a study commissioned by the provincial government and the Grassy Narrows First Nation showed that mercury continues to rise in some lakes where the people of Grassy Narrows continue to catch and eat fish.
"When I was pregnant I couldn't afford to buy food at the store, so I ate what my grandfather brought home--mostly fish," said Grassy Narrows mother Sherry Fobister, an applicant in the lawsuit. "Now I cry because I fear that my daughter may suffer for her whole life. She deserves to live a good life and be happy. This pain is never going to end if Ontario allows clear-cut logging to add even more mercury into our river."
Despite abundant evidence, Ontario refused Grassy Narrows' request for an individual environmental assessment of the impacts of clear-cut logging on the health of the community, its waterways, and its fish. In fact, the 1,200-page logging plan approved by Ontario does not even contain the word 'mercury.'
It it with all this mind that the community filed its lawsuit.
"We are asking the court to intervene to ensure that the basic rights of all Canadians, including the right to be safe from harm imposed by the government and the right to be free of discrimination, are finally upheld in Grassy Narrows," said Joseph Castrilli, legal counsel at the Canadian Environmental Law Association, which is representing the tribe. "Our clients believe that the members of Grassy Narrows have endured far too much harm and, therefore, are owed the highest degree of precaution and environmental justice."
Clear-cut logging under the plan could begin on Grassy Narrows' homeland as soon as 2016.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.