SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Demonstrators demand an ambitious climate deal from the UN climate conference in Copenhagen in 2009. (Photo: AinhoaGoma/Oxfam International/flickr/cc)
United Nations climate chief Christiana Figueres on Wednesday highlighted the urgency of a global climate agreement, warning that "time is running out."
In an interview with the Associated Press, Figueres said that the upcoming negotiations in Paris, known as COP21, were a make-or-break point.
"We are at five minutes to 12 and Paris is the 12 o'clock strike of the clock," she told the news agency.
Failure to reach a global, binding agreement at Paris would mean "we are going to be playing with fire," she said.
Figueres recently welcomed a statement by a group of leading international scientists calling for bold action on climate, stating, "The world's leading researchers on climate have underlined the crucial importance of nations focusing on a long term goal--call it zero emissions, net zero or climate neutrality. The overwhelming consensus is that Paris 2015 needs to send an unequivocal signal that the world will take a path towards a steep and deep decline in greenhouse gas pollution by the second half of the century."
Yet many climate activists are skeptical that any deal coming out of what they dub the "Conference of Polluters" can result in the kind of agreement that would stave off catastrophic climate change. As Council of Canadians' Brent Patterson wrote, this is "because the pledges being made by countries in advance of the COP21 in Paris are simply insufficient."
But the stakes couldn't be higher, Pablo Solon, Executive Director of Focus on the Global South, wrote earlier this year:
The nature of climate change with its feedback mechanism is such that what we did in the past is what we reap now. Following this logic, what we do now is what we will reap in the next 10 years, and if the current text is to be the basis of that future, we will have none of which to speak.
There is no cheating, buying or creating loopholes to delay action until 2030 - the time to act decisively is now. And these are very concrete and clear actions that need to be taken:
- leave 80 percent of the known fossil fuels reserves under the ground
- deep emissions cuts to achieve global targets - 44 Gigatons (Gt) of CO2e by 2020, 40 Gt by 2025 and 35 Gt by 2030
- reduce military and defense expenditures, which account for more than 1.5 trillion dollars globally, and instead channel these funds to provide public finance for developing countries for adaptation, mitigation and for loss and damage
- the recognition, respect and promotion of the rights of people and nature
A bad deal in Paris will lock in catastrophic consequences for the future of the planet and humanity. The urgency of the task at hand cannot be emphasized enough - we need to act now.
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
United Nations climate chief Christiana Figueres on Wednesday highlighted the urgency of a global climate agreement, warning that "time is running out."
In an interview with the Associated Press, Figueres said that the upcoming negotiations in Paris, known as COP21, were a make-or-break point.
"We are at five minutes to 12 and Paris is the 12 o'clock strike of the clock," she told the news agency.
Failure to reach a global, binding agreement at Paris would mean "we are going to be playing with fire," she said.
Figueres recently welcomed a statement by a group of leading international scientists calling for bold action on climate, stating, "The world's leading researchers on climate have underlined the crucial importance of nations focusing on a long term goal--call it zero emissions, net zero or climate neutrality. The overwhelming consensus is that Paris 2015 needs to send an unequivocal signal that the world will take a path towards a steep and deep decline in greenhouse gas pollution by the second half of the century."
Yet many climate activists are skeptical that any deal coming out of what they dub the "Conference of Polluters" can result in the kind of agreement that would stave off catastrophic climate change. As Council of Canadians' Brent Patterson wrote, this is "because the pledges being made by countries in advance of the COP21 in Paris are simply insufficient."
But the stakes couldn't be higher, Pablo Solon, Executive Director of Focus on the Global South, wrote earlier this year:
The nature of climate change with its feedback mechanism is such that what we did in the past is what we reap now. Following this logic, what we do now is what we will reap in the next 10 years, and if the current text is to be the basis of that future, we will have none of which to speak.
There is no cheating, buying or creating loopholes to delay action until 2030 - the time to act decisively is now. And these are very concrete and clear actions that need to be taken:
- leave 80 percent of the known fossil fuels reserves under the ground
- deep emissions cuts to achieve global targets - 44 Gigatons (Gt) of CO2e by 2020, 40 Gt by 2025 and 35 Gt by 2030
- reduce military and defense expenditures, which account for more than 1.5 trillion dollars globally, and instead channel these funds to provide public finance for developing countries for adaptation, mitigation and for loss and damage
- the recognition, respect and promotion of the rights of people and nature
A bad deal in Paris will lock in catastrophic consequences for the future of the planet and humanity. The urgency of the task at hand cannot be emphasized enough - we need to act now.
United Nations climate chief Christiana Figueres on Wednesday highlighted the urgency of a global climate agreement, warning that "time is running out."
In an interview with the Associated Press, Figueres said that the upcoming negotiations in Paris, known as COP21, were a make-or-break point.
"We are at five minutes to 12 and Paris is the 12 o'clock strike of the clock," she told the news agency.
Failure to reach a global, binding agreement at Paris would mean "we are going to be playing with fire," she said.
Figueres recently welcomed a statement by a group of leading international scientists calling for bold action on climate, stating, "The world's leading researchers on climate have underlined the crucial importance of nations focusing on a long term goal--call it zero emissions, net zero or climate neutrality. The overwhelming consensus is that Paris 2015 needs to send an unequivocal signal that the world will take a path towards a steep and deep decline in greenhouse gas pollution by the second half of the century."
Yet many climate activists are skeptical that any deal coming out of what they dub the "Conference of Polluters" can result in the kind of agreement that would stave off catastrophic climate change. As Council of Canadians' Brent Patterson wrote, this is "because the pledges being made by countries in advance of the COP21 in Paris are simply insufficient."
But the stakes couldn't be higher, Pablo Solon, Executive Director of Focus on the Global South, wrote earlier this year:
The nature of climate change with its feedback mechanism is such that what we did in the past is what we reap now. Following this logic, what we do now is what we will reap in the next 10 years, and if the current text is to be the basis of that future, we will have none of which to speak.
There is no cheating, buying or creating loopholes to delay action until 2030 - the time to act decisively is now. And these are very concrete and clear actions that need to be taken:
- leave 80 percent of the known fossil fuels reserves under the ground
- deep emissions cuts to achieve global targets - 44 Gigatons (Gt) of CO2e by 2020, 40 Gt by 2025 and 35 Gt by 2030
- reduce military and defense expenditures, which account for more than 1.5 trillion dollars globally, and instead channel these funds to provide public finance for developing countries for adaptation, mitigation and for loss and damage
- the recognition, respect and promotion of the rights of people and nature
A bad deal in Paris will lock in catastrophic consequences for the future of the planet and humanity. The urgency of the task at hand cannot be emphasized enough - we need to act now.