SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Members of left wing parties burn a European Union flag during a protest in the northern Greek port city of Thessaloniki, Sunday, June 28, 2015. Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras says the Bank of Greece has recommended that banks remain closed and restrictions be imposed on transactions, after the European Central Bank didn't increase the amount of emergency liquidity the lenders can access from the central bank.
President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker delivered a speech in Brussels on Monday that observers say has dramatically escalated the tensions surrounding a referendum vote in Greece next Sunday--a vote that could ultimately result in the country's exit from the Eurozone.
With global financial markets responding to Sunday's announcement that Greece's banks and stock exchange would be closed this week and the imposition of capital controls has been ordered, the crisis in Greece--or 'Grisis,' as its become known--has now reached a fevered pitch. On top of that, the people of the financially devastated nation have been asked to vote "yes" or "no" against a deal put forth by the so-called Troika, which consists of the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank, in exchange for the continuation of cash infusions and extended credit.
Telling Greek voters to vote "yes" to accept the Troika's proposal, the Guardian's Graeme Wearden called Juncker's speech "jaw-dropping" in its implications. By telling the Greek people "not to commit suicide for fear of death," Wearden says Juncker has "effectively told the Greek people that they are choosing between the euro and the exit door on Sunday, that their government has lied to them, and that he has been their friend and ally at the negotiating table."
Meanwhile, on Monday the Syriza-led government announced that public transportation would be free this week in order to soften the blow of the economic situation and that certain banks would be offering unique access to pensioners who might otherwise face difficulty accessing their funds.
On Sunday evening, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras made a televised address to the Greek people in order to explain the latest developments--including the decision to close the banks in the days ahead and to implement restrictive measures on withdrawals--and said, "the more calmly we confront difficulties, the sooner we will overcome them."
Watch:
Contrasting Tsipras' message with that of Juncker's on Monday, the Syriza Party has made it clear they are opposed to the terms of the deal on the table and will urge people to vote "no" on the proposal.
What happened over the weekend, according to New York Times columnist and Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, was what he termed a "reverse Corleone" -a reference to The Godfather film--in which the Troika made the Syriza government an offer it "couldn't accept." The commissioners, he argued, "presumably did this knowingly" to exert overt pressure on the left-wing government. Put aside the economics of the deal, explained Krugman, and "the ultimatum was, in effect, a move to replace the Greek government. And even if you don't like Syriza, that has to be disturbing for anyone who believes in European ideals."
"The EU and the IMF seem to be hell-bent on ruthlessly punishing Greece for daring to stand up against grossly unfair debt conditions that are causing enormous amounts of suffering. Refusing to allow a short delay for the referendum to take place is a brutal enforcement of unfettered capitalism over democracy and the needs of people."
--Nick Dearden, Global Justice Now
Nick Dearden, executive director of the UK-based Global Justice Now, slammed the Troika's collective behavior, specifically its refusal to allow a short extension of its bank liquidity program leading up to next Sunday's referendum vote.
"The hardline, inhumane policies of the EU now threaten to provoke a world crisis," Dearden told Common Dreams. "The EU and the IMF seem to be hell-bent on ruthlessly punishing Greece for daring to stand up against grossly unfair debt conditions causing enormous amounts of suffering. Refusing to allow a short delay for the referendum to take place is a brutal enforcement of unfettered capitalism over democracy and the needs of people."
With people across Europe calling for debt relief for Greece, Dearden continued, refusing to treat the Greek people with dignity is simply unforgivable. "This violent imposition of austerity in Greece will leave yet more blood on the hands of the EU's financial class," he said.
As the Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis tweeted over the weekend, what's at the heart of the debate right now is making sure that the people of Greece--the ones who have already sacrificed much at the altar of imposed austerity and the ones who will be most impacted by the acceptance or rejection of the deal--should be allowed to weigh in on the decision. In the wake of the referendum's announcement, he said:
\u201cDemocracy deserved a boost in euro-related matters. We just delivered it. Let the people decide. (Funny how radical this concept sounds!)\u201d— Yanis Varoufakis (@Yanis Varoufakis) 1435359316
Later, in a blog update posted on Sunday, Varoufakis described what happened on Saturday at the European Commission meeting:
The Eurogroup Meeting of 27th June 2015 will not go down as a proud moment in Europe's history. Ministers turned down the Greek government's request that the Greek people should be granted a single week during which to deliver a Yes or No answer to the institutions' proposals - proposals crucial for Greece's future in the Eurozone.
The very idea that a government would consult its people on a problematic proposal put to it by the institutions was treated with incomprehension and often with disdain bordering on contempt. I was even asked: "How do you expect common people to understand such complex issues?". Indeed, democracy did not have a good day in yesterday's Eurogroup meeting! But nor did European institutions. After our request was rejected, the Eurogroup President broke with the convention of unanimity (issuing a statement without my consent) and even took the dubious decision to convene a follow up meeting without the Greek minister, ostensibly to discuss the "next steps".
Can democracy and a monetary union coexist? Or must one give way? This is the pivotal question that the Eurogroup has decided to answer by placing democracy in the too-hard basket. So far, one hopes.
As tensions soar and fears of a financial panic set in, however, it's not just high-level Syriza officials who are saying that Greek voters would be right to reject the Troika's continued imposition of austerity, even if it means leaving the Eurozone's single currency.
In his Monday column at the Times, Krugman gave three reasons why Greece should vote "no" against the deal:
First, we now know that ever-harsher austerity is a dead end: after five years Greece is in worse shape than ever. Second, much and perhaps most of the feared chaos from Grexit has already happened. With banks closed and capital controls imposed, there's not that much more damage to be done.
Finally, acceding to the troika's ultimatum would represent the final abandonment of any pretense of Greek independence. Don't be taken in by claims that troika officials are just technocrats explaining to the ignorant Greeks what must be done. These supposed technocrats are in fact fantasists who have disregarded everything we know about macroeconomics, and have been wrong every step of the way. This isn't about analysis, it's about power -- the power of the creditors to pull the plug on the Greek economy, which persists as long as euro exit is considered unthinkable.
So it's time to put an end to this unthinkability. Otherwise Greece will face endless austerity, and a depression with no hint of an end.
Costas Panayotakis, associate professor of sociology at the City University of New York, argued much the same on Monday. "Since its election in January the Greek government has, in its attempt to reach an agreement, made many concessions to the eurozone's austerity agenda," explained Panayotakis. "The fact that, during the negotiation, Greece's European partners always asked for more suggests that they may not have truly desired an agreement, instead preferring to squash the only European government with the audacity to criticize the neoliberal consensus openly. The European response to Tsipras' announcement of a referendum also displays the long-standing aversion of European economic and political elites to democratic processes that allow European people to have a say over the future of the European project."
Meanwhile, Guardian foreign correspondent Jon Henley spoke with some of those Greeks who have been most affected by many years of financial ruin. As Henley reports:
After seven years of a crisis that has left 26% of Greece's workforce unemployed, 30% of its people below the poverty line, 17% unable to meet their daily food needs and 3.1 million without health insurance, it is hard to see how anything decided in Brussels or in Athens in the coming week will do much to change the lives of a large number of Greeks any time soon.
"Those that were already on the margins have been pushed right to the very, very edge, and those who were in the middle have been pushed to the margins," said Ioanna Pertsinidou of Praksis, a charity that runs day centres for vulnerable people and offers legal and employment advice.
"So many people - ordinary, low-to-middle income people with jobs and homes and their lives on track - have seen their lives go drown the drain so fast," Pertsinidou said. "People who never dreamed that one day they would not be able to pay their electricity bill, or feed their children properly."
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker delivered a speech in Brussels on Monday that observers say has dramatically escalated the tensions surrounding a referendum vote in Greece next Sunday--a vote that could ultimately result in the country's exit from the Eurozone.
With global financial markets responding to Sunday's announcement that Greece's banks and stock exchange would be closed this week and the imposition of capital controls has been ordered, the crisis in Greece--or 'Grisis,' as its become known--has now reached a fevered pitch. On top of that, the people of the financially devastated nation have been asked to vote "yes" or "no" against a deal put forth by the so-called Troika, which consists of the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank, in exchange for the continuation of cash infusions and extended credit.
Telling Greek voters to vote "yes" to accept the Troika's proposal, the Guardian's Graeme Wearden called Juncker's speech "jaw-dropping" in its implications. By telling the Greek people "not to commit suicide for fear of death," Wearden says Juncker has "effectively told the Greek people that they are choosing between the euro and the exit door on Sunday, that their government has lied to them, and that he has been their friend and ally at the negotiating table."
Meanwhile, on Monday the Syriza-led government announced that public transportation would be free this week in order to soften the blow of the economic situation and that certain banks would be offering unique access to pensioners who might otherwise face difficulty accessing their funds.
On Sunday evening, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras made a televised address to the Greek people in order to explain the latest developments--including the decision to close the banks in the days ahead and to implement restrictive measures on withdrawals--and said, "the more calmly we confront difficulties, the sooner we will overcome them."
Watch:
Contrasting Tsipras' message with that of Juncker's on Monday, the Syriza Party has made it clear they are opposed to the terms of the deal on the table and will urge people to vote "no" on the proposal.
What happened over the weekend, according to New York Times columnist and Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, was what he termed a "reverse Corleone" -a reference to The Godfather film--in which the Troika made the Syriza government an offer it "couldn't accept." The commissioners, he argued, "presumably did this knowingly" to exert overt pressure on the left-wing government. Put aside the economics of the deal, explained Krugman, and "the ultimatum was, in effect, a move to replace the Greek government. And even if you don't like Syriza, that has to be disturbing for anyone who believes in European ideals."
"The EU and the IMF seem to be hell-bent on ruthlessly punishing Greece for daring to stand up against grossly unfair debt conditions that are causing enormous amounts of suffering. Refusing to allow a short delay for the referendum to take place is a brutal enforcement of unfettered capitalism over democracy and the needs of people."
--Nick Dearden, Global Justice Now
Nick Dearden, executive director of the UK-based Global Justice Now, slammed the Troika's collective behavior, specifically its refusal to allow a short extension of its bank liquidity program leading up to next Sunday's referendum vote.
"The hardline, inhumane policies of the EU now threaten to provoke a world crisis," Dearden told Common Dreams. "The EU and the IMF seem to be hell-bent on ruthlessly punishing Greece for daring to stand up against grossly unfair debt conditions causing enormous amounts of suffering. Refusing to allow a short delay for the referendum to take place is a brutal enforcement of unfettered capitalism over democracy and the needs of people."
With people across Europe calling for debt relief for Greece, Dearden continued, refusing to treat the Greek people with dignity is simply unforgivable. "This violent imposition of austerity in Greece will leave yet more blood on the hands of the EU's financial class," he said.
As the Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis tweeted over the weekend, what's at the heart of the debate right now is making sure that the people of Greece--the ones who have already sacrificed much at the altar of imposed austerity and the ones who will be most impacted by the acceptance or rejection of the deal--should be allowed to weigh in on the decision. In the wake of the referendum's announcement, he said:
\u201cDemocracy deserved a boost in euro-related matters. We just delivered it. Let the people decide. (Funny how radical this concept sounds!)\u201d— Yanis Varoufakis (@Yanis Varoufakis) 1435359316
Later, in a blog update posted on Sunday, Varoufakis described what happened on Saturday at the European Commission meeting:
The Eurogroup Meeting of 27th June 2015 will not go down as a proud moment in Europe's history. Ministers turned down the Greek government's request that the Greek people should be granted a single week during which to deliver a Yes or No answer to the institutions' proposals - proposals crucial for Greece's future in the Eurozone.
The very idea that a government would consult its people on a problematic proposal put to it by the institutions was treated with incomprehension and often with disdain bordering on contempt. I was even asked: "How do you expect common people to understand such complex issues?". Indeed, democracy did not have a good day in yesterday's Eurogroup meeting! But nor did European institutions. After our request was rejected, the Eurogroup President broke with the convention of unanimity (issuing a statement without my consent) and even took the dubious decision to convene a follow up meeting without the Greek minister, ostensibly to discuss the "next steps".
Can democracy and a monetary union coexist? Or must one give way? This is the pivotal question that the Eurogroup has decided to answer by placing democracy in the too-hard basket. So far, one hopes.
As tensions soar and fears of a financial panic set in, however, it's not just high-level Syriza officials who are saying that Greek voters would be right to reject the Troika's continued imposition of austerity, even if it means leaving the Eurozone's single currency.
In his Monday column at the Times, Krugman gave three reasons why Greece should vote "no" against the deal:
First, we now know that ever-harsher austerity is a dead end: after five years Greece is in worse shape than ever. Second, much and perhaps most of the feared chaos from Grexit has already happened. With banks closed and capital controls imposed, there's not that much more damage to be done.
Finally, acceding to the troika's ultimatum would represent the final abandonment of any pretense of Greek independence. Don't be taken in by claims that troika officials are just technocrats explaining to the ignorant Greeks what must be done. These supposed technocrats are in fact fantasists who have disregarded everything we know about macroeconomics, and have been wrong every step of the way. This isn't about analysis, it's about power -- the power of the creditors to pull the plug on the Greek economy, which persists as long as euro exit is considered unthinkable.
So it's time to put an end to this unthinkability. Otherwise Greece will face endless austerity, and a depression with no hint of an end.
Costas Panayotakis, associate professor of sociology at the City University of New York, argued much the same on Monday. "Since its election in January the Greek government has, in its attempt to reach an agreement, made many concessions to the eurozone's austerity agenda," explained Panayotakis. "The fact that, during the negotiation, Greece's European partners always asked for more suggests that they may not have truly desired an agreement, instead preferring to squash the only European government with the audacity to criticize the neoliberal consensus openly. The European response to Tsipras' announcement of a referendum also displays the long-standing aversion of European economic and political elites to democratic processes that allow European people to have a say over the future of the European project."
Meanwhile, Guardian foreign correspondent Jon Henley spoke with some of those Greeks who have been most affected by many years of financial ruin. As Henley reports:
After seven years of a crisis that has left 26% of Greece's workforce unemployed, 30% of its people below the poverty line, 17% unable to meet their daily food needs and 3.1 million without health insurance, it is hard to see how anything decided in Brussels or in Athens in the coming week will do much to change the lives of a large number of Greeks any time soon.
"Those that were already on the margins have been pushed right to the very, very edge, and those who were in the middle have been pushed to the margins," said Ioanna Pertsinidou of Praksis, a charity that runs day centres for vulnerable people and offers legal and employment advice.
"So many people - ordinary, low-to-middle income people with jobs and homes and their lives on track - have seen their lives go drown the drain so fast," Pertsinidou said. "People who never dreamed that one day they would not be able to pay their electricity bill, or feed their children properly."
President of the European Commission Jean-Claude Juncker delivered a speech in Brussels on Monday that observers say has dramatically escalated the tensions surrounding a referendum vote in Greece next Sunday--a vote that could ultimately result in the country's exit from the Eurozone.
With global financial markets responding to Sunday's announcement that Greece's banks and stock exchange would be closed this week and the imposition of capital controls has been ordered, the crisis in Greece--or 'Grisis,' as its become known--has now reached a fevered pitch. On top of that, the people of the financially devastated nation have been asked to vote "yes" or "no" against a deal put forth by the so-called Troika, which consists of the European Commission, the International Monetary Fund, and the European Central Bank, in exchange for the continuation of cash infusions and extended credit.
Telling Greek voters to vote "yes" to accept the Troika's proposal, the Guardian's Graeme Wearden called Juncker's speech "jaw-dropping" in its implications. By telling the Greek people "not to commit suicide for fear of death," Wearden says Juncker has "effectively told the Greek people that they are choosing between the euro and the exit door on Sunday, that their government has lied to them, and that he has been their friend and ally at the negotiating table."
Meanwhile, on Monday the Syriza-led government announced that public transportation would be free this week in order to soften the blow of the economic situation and that certain banks would be offering unique access to pensioners who might otherwise face difficulty accessing their funds.
On Sunday evening, Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras made a televised address to the Greek people in order to explain the latest developments--including the decision to close the banks in the days ahead and to implement restrictive measures on withdrawals--and said, "the more calmly we confront difficulties, the sooner we will overcome them."
Watch:
Contrasting Tsipras' message with that of Juncker's on Monday, the Syriza Party has made it clear they are opposed to the terms of the deal on the table and will urge people to vote "no" on the proposal.
What happened over the weekend, according to New York Times columnist and Nobel-winning economist Paul Krugman, was what he termed a "reverse Corleone" -a reference to The Godfather film--in which the Troika made the Syriza government an offer it "couldn't accept." The commissioners, he argued, "presumably did this knowingly" to exert overt pressure on the left-wing government. Put aside the economics of the deal, explained Krugman, and "the ultimatum was, in effect, a move to replace the Greek government. And even if you don't like Syriza, that has to be disturbing for anyone who believes in European ideals."
"The EU and the IMF seem to be hell-bent on ruthlessly punishing Greece for daring to stand up against grossly unfair debt conditions that are causing enormous amounts of suffering. Refusing to allow a short delay for the referendum to take place is a brutal enforcement of unfettered capitalism over democracy and the needs of people."
--Nick Dearden, Global Justice Now
Nick Dearden, executive director of the UK-based Global Justice Now, slammed the Troika's collective behavior, specifically its refusal to allow a short extension of its bank liquidity program leading up to next Sunday's referendum vote.
"The hardline, inhumane policies of the EU now threaten to provoke a world crisis," Dearden told Common Dreams. "The EU and the IMF seem to be hell-bent on ruthlessly punishing Greece for daring to stand up against grossly unfair debt conditions causing enormous amounts of suffering. Refusing to allow a short delay for the referendum to take place is a brutal enforcement of unfettered capitalism over democracy and the needs of people."
With people across Europe calling for debt relief for Greece, Dearden continued, refusing to treat the Greek people with dignity is simply unforgivable. "This violent imposition of austerity in Greece will leave yet more blood on the hands of the EU's financial class," he said.
As the Greek Finance Minister Yanis Varoufakis tweeted over the weekend, what's at the heart of the debate right now is making sure that the people of Greece--the ones who have already sacrificed much at the altar of imposed austerity and the ones who will be most impacted by the acceptance or rejection of the deal--should be allowed to weigh in on the decision. In the wake of the referendum's announcement, he said:
\u201cDemocracy deserved a boost in euro-related matters. We just delivered it. Let the people decide. (Funny how radical this concept sounds!)\u201d— Yanis Varoufakis (@Yanis Varoufakis) 1435359316
Later, in a blog update posted on Sunday, Varoufakis described what happened on Saturday at the European Commission meeting:
The Eurogroup Meeting of 27th June 2015 will not go down as a proud moment in Europe's history. Ministers turned down the Greek government's request that the Greek people should be granted a single week during which to deliver a Yes or No answer to the institutions' proposals - proposals crucial for Greece's future in the Eurozone.
The very idea that a government would consult its people on a problematic proposal put to it by the institutions was treated with incomprehension and often with disdain bordering on contempt. I was even asked: "How do you expect common people to understand such complex issues?". Indeed, democracy did not have a good day in yesterday's Eurogroup meeting! But nor did European institutions. After our request was rejected, the Eurogroup President broke with the convention of unanimity (issuing a statement without my consent) and even took the dubious decision to convene a follow up meeting without the Greek minister, ostensibly to discuss the "next steps".
Can democracy and a monetary union coexist? Or must one give way? This is the pivotal question that the Eurogroup has decided to answer by placing democracy in the too-hard basket. So far, one hopes.
As tensions soar and fears of a financial panic set in, however, it's not just high-level Syriza officials who are saying that Greek voters would be right to reject the Troika's continued imposition of austerity, even if it means leaving the Eurozone's single currency.
In his Monday column at the Times, Krugman gave three reasons why Greece should vote "no" against the deal:
First, we now know that ever-harsher austerity is a dead end: after five years Greece is in worse shape than ever. Second, much and perhaps most of the feared chaos from Grexit has already happened. With banks closed and capital controls imposed, there's not that much more damage to be done.
Finally, acceding to the troika's ultimatum would represent the final abandonment of any pretense of Greek independence. Don't be taken in by claims that troika officials are just technocrats explaining to the ignorant Greeks what must be done. These supposed technocrats are in fact fantasists who have disregarded everything we know about macroeconomics, and have been wrong every step of the way. This isn't about analysis, it's about power -- the power of the creditors to pull the plug on the Greek economy, which persists as long as euro exit is considered unthinkable.
So it's time to put an end to this unthinkability. Otherwise Greece will face endless austerity, and a depression with no hint of an end.
Costas Panayotakis, associate professor of sociology at the City University of New York, argued much the same on Monday. "Since its election in January the Greek government has, in its attempt to reach an agreement, made many concessions to the eurozone's austerity agenda," explained Panayotakis. "The fact that, during the negotiation, Greece's European partners always asked for more suggests that they may not have truly desired an agreement, instead preferring to squash the only European government with the audacity to criticize the neoliberal consensus openly. The European response to Tsipras' announcement of a referendum also displays the long-standing aversion of European economic and political elites to democratic processes that allow European people to have a say over the future of the European project."
Meanwhile, Guardian foreign correspondent Jon Henley spoke with some of those Greeks who have been most affected by many years of financial ruin. As Henley reports:
After seven years of a crisis that has left 26% of Greece's workforce unemployed, 30% of its people below the poverty line, 17% unable to meet their daily food needs and 3.1 million without health insurance, it is hard to see how anything decided in Brussels or in Athens in the coming week will do much to change the lives of a large number of Greeks any time soon.
"Those that were already on the margins have been pushed right to the very, very edge, and those who were in the middle have been pushed to the margins," said Ioanna Pertsinidou of Praksis, a charity that runs day centres for vulnerable people and offers legal and employment advice.
"So many people - ordinary, low-to-middle income people with jobs and homes and their lives on track - have seen their lives go drown the drain so fast," Pertsinidou said. "People who never dreamed that one day they would not be able to pay their electricity bill, or feed their children properly."
"Bureau of Labor Statistics data is what determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits," said Rep. John Larson. "It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position."
U.S. President Donald Trump's pick to replace the top labor statistics official he fired earlier this month has called Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" that needs to be "sunset," comments that critics said further disqualify the nominee for the key government role.
During a December 2024 radio interview, Heritage Foundation economist E.J. Antoni said it is a "mathematical fiction" that Social Security "can go on forever" and called for "some kind of transition program where unfortunately you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes, but never actually receive any of those benefits."
"That's the price to pay for unwinding a Ponzi scheme that was foisted on the American people by the Democrats in the 1930s," Antoni continued. "You're not going to be able to sustain a Ponzi scheme like Social Security. Eventually, you need to sunset the program."
Trump's choice for the Commissioner of the Bureau Labor Statistics called Social Security a "Ponzi scheme" in an interview:
" What you need to do is have some kind of transition program where unfortunately you'll need a generation of people who pay Social Security taxes, but… pic.twitter.com/MXL7k1C644
— More Perfect Union (@MorePerfectUS) August 12, 2025
Rep. John Larson (D-Conn.), one of Social Security's most vocal defenders in Congress, said Antoni's position on the program matters because "Bureau of Labor Statistics data is what determines the annual cost-of-living adjustment for Social Security benefits."
"It should alarm everyone when a yes-man determined to end Social Security is installed in this position," Larson said in a statement. "I call on every Senate Republican to stand with Democrats and reject this extreme nominee—before our seniors are denied the benefits they earned through a lifetime of hard work."
Trump announced Antoni's nomination to serve as the next commissioner of the Bureau of Labor Statistics (BLS) less than two weeks after the president fired the agency's former head, Erika McEntarfer, following the release of abysmal jobs figures. The firing sparked concerns that future BLS data will be manipulated to suit Trump's political interests.
Antoni was a contributor to the far-right Project 2025 agenda that the Trump administration appears to have drawn from repeatedly this year, and his position on Social Security echoes that of far-right billionaire Elon Musk, who has also falsely characterized the program as a Ponzi scheme.
During his time in the Trump administration, Musk spearheaded an assault on the Social Security Administration that continues in the present, causing widespread chaos at the agency and increasing wait times for beneficiaries.
"President Trump fired the commissioner of Labor Statistics to cover up a weak jobs report—and now he is replacing her with a Project 2025 lackey who wants to shut down Social Security," said Larson. "E.J. Antoni agrees with Elon Musk that Social Security is a Ponzi scheme and said that middle-class seniors would be better off if it was eliminated."
"This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves," said one Amnesty campaigner.
After leaked drafts exposed the Trump administration's plans to downplay human rights abuses in some allied countries, including Israel, the U.S. Department of State released the final edition of an annual report on Tuesday, sparking fresh condemnation.
"Breaking with precedent, Secretary of State Marco Rubio did not provide a written introduction to the report nor did he make remarks about it," CNN reported. Still, Amanda Klasing, Amnesty International USA's national director of government relations and advocacy, called him out by name in a Tuesday statement.
"With the release of the U.S. State Department's human rights report, it is clear that the Trump administration has engaged in a very selective documentation of human rights abuses in certain countries," Klasing said. "In addition to eliminating entire sections for certain countries—for example discrimination against LGBTQ+ people—there are also arbitrary omissions within existing sections of the report based on the country."
Klasing explained that "we have criticized past reports when warranted, but have never seen reports quite like this. Never before have the reports gone this far in prioritizing an administration's political agenda over a consistent and truthful accounting of human rights violations around the world—softening criticism in some countries while ignoring violations in others. The State Department has said in relation to the reports less is more. However, for the victims and human rights defenders who rely on these reports to shine light on abuses and violations, less is just less."
"Secretary Rubio knows full well from his time in the Senate how vital these reports are in informing policy decisions and shaping diplomatic conversations, yet he has made the dangerous and short-sighted decision to put out a truncated version that doesn't tell the whole story of human rights violations," she continued. "This sends a chilling message that the U.S. is willing to overlook some abuses, signaling that people experiencing human rights violations may be left to fend for themselves."
"Failing to adequately report on human rights violations further damages the credibility of the U.S. on human rights issues," she added. "It's shameful that the Trump administration and Secretary Rubio are putting politics above human lives."
The overarching report—which includes over 100 individual country reports—covers 2024, the last full calendar year of the Biden administration. The appendix says that in March, the report was "streamlined for better utility and accessibility in the field and by partners, and to be more responsive to the underlying legislative mandate and aligned to the administration's executive orders."
As CNN detailed:
The latest report was stripped of many of the specific sections included in past reports, including reporting on alleged abuses based on sexual orientation, violence toward women, corruption in government, systemic racial or ethnic violence, or denial of a fair public trial. Some country reports, including for Afghanistan, do address human rights abuses against women.
"We were asked to edit down the human rights reports to the bare minimum of what was statutorily required," said Michael Honigstein, the former director of African Affairs at the State Department's Bureau of Human Rights, Democracy, and Labor. He and his office helped compile the initial reports.
Over the past week, since the draft country reports leaked to the press, the Trump administration has come under fire for its portrayals of El Salvador, Israel, and Russia.
The report on Israel—and the illegally occupied Palestinian territories, the Gaza Strip and the West Bank—is just nine pages. The brevity even drew the attention of Israeli media. The Times of Israel highlighted that it "is much shorter than last year's edition compiled under the Biden administration and contained no mention of the severe humanitarian crisis in Gaza."
Since the Hamas-led October 7, 2023 attack on Israel, Israeli forces have slaughtered over 60,000 Palestinians in Gaza, according to local officials—though experts warn the true toll is likely far higher. As Israel has restricted humanitarian aid in recent months, over 200 people have starved to death, including 103 children.
The U.S. report on Israel does not mention the genocide case that Israel faces at the International Court of Justice over the assault on Gaza, or the International Criminal Court arrest warrants issued for Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and former Defense Minister Yoav Gallant for alleged war crimes and crimes against humanity.
The section on war crimes and genocide only says that "terrorist organizations Hamas and Hezbollah continue to engage in the
indiscriminate targeting of Israeli civilians in violation of the law of armed conflict."
As the world mourns the killing of six more Palestinian media professionals in Gaza this week—which prompted calls for the United Nations Security Council to convene an emergency meeting—the report's section on press freedom is also short and makes no mention of the hundreds of journalists killed in Israel's annihilation of the strip:
The law generally provided for freedom of expression, including for members of the press and other media, and the government generally respected this right for most Israelis. NGOs and journalists reported authorities restricted press coverage and limited certain forms of expression, especially in the context of criticism against the war or sympathy for Palestinians in Gaza.
Noting that "the human rights reports have been among the U.S. government's most-read documents," DAWN senior adviser and 32-year State Department official Charles Blaha said the "significant omissions" in this year's report on Israel, Gaza, and the West Bank render it "functionally useless for Congress and the public as nothing more than a pro-Israel document."
Like Klasing at Amnesty, Sarah Leah Whitson, DAWN's executive director, specifically called out the U.S. secretary of state.
"Secretary Rubio has revamped the State Department reports for one principal purpose: to whitewash Israeli crimes, including its horrific genocide and starvation in Gaza. The report shockingly includes not a word about the overwhelming evidence of genocide, mass starvation, and the deliberate bombardment of civilians in Gaza," she said. "Rubio has defied the letter and intent of U.S. laws requiring the State Department to report truthfully and comprehensively about every country's human rights abuses, instead offering up anodyne cover for his murderous friends in Tel Aviv."
The Tuesday release came after a coalition of LGBTQ+ and human rights organizations on Monday filed a lawsuit against the U.S. State Department over its refusal to release the congressionally mandated report.
This article has been updated with comment from DAWN.
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," said the head of Common Cause.
As Republicans try to rig congressional maps in several states and Democrats threaten retaliatory measures, a pro-democracy watchdog on Tuesday unveiled new fairness standards underscoring that "independent redistricting commissions remain the gold standard for ending partisan gerrymandering."
Common Cause will hold an online media briefing Wednesday at noon Eastern time "to walk reporters though the six pieces of criteria the organization will use to evaluate any proposed maps."
The Washington, D.C.-based advocacy group said that "it will closely evaluate, but not automatically condemn, countermeasures" to Republican gerrymandering efforts—especially mid-decade redistricting not based on decennial censuses.
Amid the gerrymandering wars, we just launched 6 fairness criteria to hold all actors to the same principled standard: people first—not parties. Read our criteria here: www.commoncause.org/resources/po...
[image or embed]
— Common Cause (@commoncause.org) August 12, 2025 at 12:01 PM
Common Cause's six fairness criteria for mid-decade redistricting are:
"We will not sit idly by while political leaders manipulate voting maps to entrench their power and subvert our democracy," Common Cause president and CEO Virginia Kase Solomón said in a statement. "But neither will we call for unilateral political disarmament in the face of authoritarian tactics that undermine fair representation."
"We have established a fairness criteria that we will use to evaluate all countermeasures so we can respond to the most urgent threats to fair representation while holding all actors to the same principled standard: people—not parties—first," she added.
Common Cause's fairness criteria come amid the ongoing standoff between Republicans trying to gerrymander Texas' congressional map and Democratic lawmakers who fled the state in a bid to stymie a vote on the measure. Texas state senators on Tuesday approved the proposed map despite a walkout by most of their Democratic colleagues.
Leaders of several Democrat-controlled states, most notably California, have threatened retaliatory redistricting.
"This moment is about more than responding to a single threat—it's about building the movement for lasting reform," Kase Solomón asserted. "This is not an isolated political tactic; it is part of a broader march toward authoritarianism, dismantling people-powered democracy, and stripping away the people's ability to have a political voice and say in how they are governed."