Jun 18, 2015
Democrats in the U.S. are shifting to the left, according to new data from Gallup.
Or, as Frank Newport writes for the research and polling firm: "Democratic candidates for the 2016 presidential nomination face a significantly more left-leaning party base than their predecessors did over the last 15 years."
According to telephone interviews conducted in the first week of May with more than 1,000 adults, 47 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents now identify as both socially liberal and economically moderate or liberal. This is compared with 39 percent in these categories in 2008, when there was last an open seat for their party's nomination, and 30 percent in 2001.
Elaborating on the poll's implications, Newport added: "The shift in the electorate may help explain the attention being garnered by long-shot candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont who has used the label 'socialist' to describe himself and who is avowedly liberal across the board."
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit news service. All of our content is free to you - no subscriptions; no ads. We are funded by donations from our readers. Our critical Mid-Year fundraiser is going very slowly - only 733 readers have contributed so far. We must meet our goal before we can end this fundraising campaign and get back to focusing on what we do best. |
Writing last month at Salon, Jim Newell urged Democrats to "stop hiding" from the "l-word"--liberal:
Liberal doesn't need to be a naughty word when it comes to economic issues. Americans lopsidedly support quintessential "economically liberal" positions like protecting Social Security and Medicare, raising taxes on the wealthy, and maintaining discretionary spending programs for education, medical research, infrastructure, etc. People may conceive of these as "moderate" positions, and they may have once been. But now they are positions that are under withering assault from "economic conservatives."
You would never, ever catch President Obama -- at least before he was a lame duck -- going out there and describing the aforementioned positions as "liberal" ones, or himself as a "liberal." He would describe his economics as "common sense," "middle class," or some other milquetoast phrase. He would go to great lengths, in fact, when accused -- gasp! -- of being a "liberal." As long as Democratic standard-bearers refuse to describe these economically liberal positions as such, though, Republicans will continue using "liberal" as a caricature -- and an effective one.
Gallup reports: "The trends for the entire country show a shift toward more liberal self-identification, and that trend is even more pronounced among Democrats on social issues." In fact, more than half of Democrats (53%) currently describe themselves as socially liberal, up from 35 percent in 2001.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Democrats in the U.S. are shifting to the left, according to new data from Gallup.
Or, as Frank Newport writes for the research and polling firm: "Democratic candidates for the 2016 presidential nomination face a significantly more left-leaning party base than their predecessors did over the last 15 years."
According to telephone interviews conducted in the first week of May with more than 1,000 adults, 47 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents now identify as both socially liberal and economically moderate or liberal. This is compared with 39 percent in these categories in 2008, when there was last an open seat for their party's nomination, and 30 percent in 2001.
Elaborating on the poll's implications, Newport added: "The shift in the electorate may help explain the attention being garnered by long-shot candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont who has used the label 'socialist' to describe himself and who is avowedly liberal across the board."
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit news service. All of our content is free to you - no subscriptions; no ads. We are funded by donations from our readers. Our critical Mid-Year fundraiser is going very slowly - only 733 readers have contributed so far. We must meet our goal before we can end this fundraising campaign and get back to focusing on what we do best. |
Writing last month at Salon, Jim Newell urged Democrats to "stop hiding" from the "l-word"--liberal:
Liberal doesn't need to be a naughty word when it comes to economic issues. Americans lopsidedly support quintessential "economically liberal" positions like protecting Social Security and Medicare, raising taxes on the wealthy, and maintaining discretionary spending programs for education, medical research, infrastructure, etc. People may conceive of these as "moderate" positions, and they may have once been. But now they are positions that are under withering assault from "economic conservatives."
You would never, ever catch President Obama -- at least before he was a lame duck -- going out there and describing the aforementioned positions as "liberal" ones, or himself as a "liberal." He would describe his economics as "common sense," "middle class," or some other milquetoast phrase. He would go to great lengths, in fact, when accused -- gasp! -- of being a "liberal." As long as Democratic standard-bearers refuse to describe these economically liberal positions as such, though, Republicans will continue using "liberal" as a caricature -- and an effective one.
Gallup reports: "The trends for the entire country show a shift toward more liberal self-identification, and that trend is even more pronounced among Democrats on social issues." In fact, more than half of Democrats (53%) currently describe themselves as socially liberal, up from 35 percent in 2001.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Democrats in the U.S. are shifting to the left, according to new data from Gallup.
Or, as Frank Newport writes for the research and polling firm: "Democratic candidates for the 2016 presidential nomination face a significantly more left-leaning party base than their predecessors did over the last 15 years."
According to telephone interviews conducted in the first week of May with more than 1,000 adults, 47 percent of Democrats and Democratic-leaning independents now identify as both socially liberal and economically moderate or liberal. This is compared with 39 percent in these categories in 2008, when there was last an open seat for their party's nomination, and 30 percent in 2001.
Elaborating on the poll's implications, Newport added: "The shift in the electorate may help explain the attention being garnered by long-shot candidate Sen. Bernie Sanders of Vermont who has used the label 'socialist' to describe himself and who is avowedly liberal across the board."
We Interrupt This Article with an Urgent Message! Common Dreams is a not-for-profit news service. All of our content is free to you - no subscriptions; no ads. We are funded by donations from our readers. Our critical Mid-Year fundraiser is going very slowly - only 733 readers have contributed so far. We must meet our goal before we can end this fundraising campaign and get back to focusing on what we do best. |
Writing last month at Salon, Jim Newell urged Democrats to "stop hiding" from the "l-word"--liberal:
Liberal doesn't need to be a naughty word when it comes to economic issues. Americans lopsidedly support quintessential "economically liberal" positions like protecting Social Security and Medicare, raising taxes on the wealthy, and maintaining discretionary spending programs for education, medical research, infrastructure, etc. People may conceive of these as "moderate" positions, and they may have once been. But now they are positions that are under withering assault from "economic conservatives."
You would never, ever catch President Obama -- at least before he was a lame duck -- going out there and describing the aforementioned positions as "liberal" ones, or himself as a "liberal." He would describe his economics as "common sense," "middle class," or some other milquetoast phrase. He would go to great lengths, in fact, when accused -- gasp! -- of being a "liberal." As long as Democratic standard-bearers refuse to describe these economically liberal positions as such, though, Republicans will continue using "liberal" as a caricature -- and an effective one.
Gallup reports: "The trends for the entire country show a shift toward more liberal self-identification, and that trend is even more pronounced among Democrats on social issues." In fact, more than half of Democrats (53%) currently describe themselves as socially liberal, up from 35 percent in 2001.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.