SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Catching Clinton, Sanders Surges
Several polls now show Sen. Bernie Sanders closing the gap between himself and frontrunner Hillary Clinton
Jun 17, 2015
Several new polls from the early battleground state of New Hampshire indicate that the progressive message of Sen. Bernie Sanders--who has been busy talking about the troubling supremacy of Wall Street banks, vast economic inequality, the crisis of money in politics, and the imperative to address the climate crisis--is resonating with prospective voters in the early battleground state as he rapidly closes the gap with Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton.
"Don't underestimate the power of the progressive nerve network. It is alive, far-reaching, and it is translating into political muscle in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."
--David Paleologos, Suffolk University
According to a Suffolk University poll released Tuesday, Sanders garnered the support of 31 percent of likely Democratic primary voters compared to Clinton who received 41 percent. With just ten points now separating the candidates, Sanders' increase in popularity is happening much faster than many political observers say they expected.
In late May, a University of New Hampshire poll showed that only 13 percent of likely New Hampshire voters would vote for Sanders.
Though some experts felt that Clinton's early and substantial lead would ultimately shrink, David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center in Boston, says the speed at which Sanders has closed the gap was not widely expected. "In New Hampshire right now," he said, "the lead has shrunk a lot, and this is a much different Democratic primary race than we are seeing in other states so far."
Strikingly--and accounting for Clinton's high level of name recognition--when respondents who said they "know both candidates" were asked for their preferences, the lead for the former first lady and secretary of state dropped from ten points to just three (38% to 35 %).
"This signals that Clinton is leading because more voters have never heard of Sanders," said Paleologos. "Perhaps the most telling statistic is political philosophy." According to the poll, Clinton led Sanders among self-identified moderates 46 percent to 26 percent, but among those identifying as liberal, the race is tied at 39 percent.
"Don't underestimate the power of the progressive nerve network," said Paleologos. "It is alive, far-reaching, and it is translating into political muscle in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."
And that says something profound about the impact Sanders' message is having on voters who know about him and understand the platform he's running on. As Jon Green at AmericaBlog explains on Wednesday morning:
when Suffolk asked respondents who weren't supporting Clinton why that was the case, almost as many stated a positive preference for Sanders (10%) as expressed a negative distrust of Clinton (12%). In other words, support for Sanders is more than a mere protest against Clinton; people who are familiar with Sanders like what he has to say. A lot.
While polls in other early primary states show Clinton with a clear and commanding lead, Sanders has maintained for weeks that he is going to win New Hampshire, his home state of Vermont's next-door neighbor. These series of polls show that, with more than six months left until the primary takes place, he has plenty of time to close the gap and prove himself right.
Earlier this week, a survey conducted by Morning Consult showed Sanders standing at 32 percent among likely voters, just twelve points behind Clinton's 44 percent.
While Green said he "wouldn't go as far as to say that two polls from one state in early June make for a plausible path to victory," Sanders' early performance in New Hampshire suggests there is an opening for Sanders to turn the primary season into a meaningful race.
"The less Hillary Clinton says on issues progressives care about," said Green, "and the more Bernie keeps being Bernie, the more momentum we'll see him pick up."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
bernie sandersclimate crisisdemocratic primaryeconomic inequalityelection 2016hillary clintonmoney in politicsnew hampshire
Several new polls from the early battleground state of New Hampshire indicate that the progressive message of Sen. Bernie Sanders--who has been busy talking about the troubling supremacy of Wall Street banks, vast economic inequality, the crisis of money in politics, and the imperative to address the climate crisis--is resonating with prospective voters in the early battleground state as he rapidly closes the gap with Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton.
"Don't underestimate the power of the progressive nerve network. It is alive, far-reaching, and it is translating into political muscle in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."
--David Paleologos, Suffolk University
According to a Suffolk University poll released Tuesday, Sanders garnered the support of 31 percent of likely Democratic primary voters compared to Clinton who received 41 percent. With just ten points now separating the candidates, Sanders' increase in popularity is happening much faster than many political observers say they expected.
In late May, a University of New Hampshire poll showed that only 13 percent of likely New Hampshire voters would vote for Sanders.
Though some experts felt that Clinton's early and substantial lead would ultimately shrink, David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center in Boston, says the speed at which Sanders has closed the gap was not widely expected. "In New Hampshire right now," he said, "the lead has shrunk a lot, and this is a much different Democratic primary race than we are seeing in other states so far."
Strikingly--and accounting for Clinton's high level of name recognition--when respondents who said they "know both candidates" were asked for their preferences, the lead for the former first lady and secretary of state dropped from ten points to just three (38% to 35 %).
"This signals that Clinton is leading because more voters have never heard of Sanders," said Paleologos. "Perhaps the most telling statistic is political philosophy." According to the poll, Clinton led Sanders among self-identified moderates 46 percent to 26 percent, but among those identifying as liberal, the race is tied at 39 percent.
"Don't underestimate the power of the progressive nerve network," said Paleologos. "It is alive, far-reaching, and it is translating into political muscle in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."
And that says something profound about the impact Sanders' message is having on voters who know about him and understand the platform he's running on. As Jon Green at AmericaBlog explains on Wednesday morning:
when Suffolk asked respondents who weren't supporting Clinton why that was the case, almost as many stated a positive preference for Sanders (10%) as expressed a negative distrust of Clinton (12%). In other words, support for Sanders is more than a mere protest against Clinton; people who are familiar with Sanders like what he has to say. A lot.
While polls in other early primary states show Clinton with a clear and commanding lead, Sanders has maintained for weeks that he is going to win New Hampshire, his home state of Vermont's next-door neighbor. These series of polls show that, with more than six months left until the primary takes place, he has plenty of time to close the gap and prove himself right.
Earlier this week, a survey conducted by Morning Consult showed Sanders standing at 32 percent among likely voters, just twelve points behind Clinton's 44 percent.
While Green said he "wouldn't go as far as to say that two polls from one state in early June make for a plausible path to victory," Sanders' early performance in New Hampshire suggests there is an opening for Sanders to turn the primary season into a meaningful race.
"The less Hillary Clinton says on issues progressives care about," said Green, "and the more Bernie keeps being Bernie, the more momentum we'll see him pick up."
Several new polls from the early battleground state of New Hampshire indicate that the progressive message of Sen. Bernie Sanders--who has been busy talking about the troubling supremacy of Wall Street banks, vast economic inequality, the crisis of money in politics, and the imperative to address the climate crisis--is resonating with prospective voters in the early battleground state as he rapidly closes the gap with Democratic frontrunner Hillary Clinton.
"Don't underestimate the power of the progressive nerve network. It is alive, far-reaching, and it is translating into political muscle in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."
--David Paleologos, Suffolk University
According to a Suffolk University poll released Tuesday, Sanders garnered the support of 31 percent of likely Democratic primary voters compared to Clinton who received 41 percent. With just ten points now separating the candidates, Sanders' increase in popularity is happening much faster than many political observers say they expected.
In late May, a University of New Hampshire poll showed that only 13 percent of likely New Hampshire voters would vote for Sanders.
Though some experts felt that Clinton's early and substantial lead would ultimately shrink, David Paleologos, director of the Suffolk University Political Research Center in Boston, says the speed at which Sanders has closed the gap was not widely expected. "In New Hampshire right now," he said, "the lead has shrunk a lot, and this is a much different Democratic primary race than we are seeing in other states so far."
Strikingly--and accounting for Clinton's high level of name recognition--when respondents who said they "know both candidates" were asked for their preferences, the lead for the former first lady and secretary of state dropped from ten points to just three (38% to 35 %).
"This signals that Clinton is leading because more voters have never heard of Sanders," said Paleologos. "Perhaps the most telling statistic is political philosophy." According to the poll, Clinton led Sanders among self-identified moderates 46 percent to 26 percent, but among those identifying as liberal, the race is tied at 39 percent.
"Don't underestimate the power of the progressive nerve network," said Paleologos. "It is alive, far-reaching, and it is translating into political muscle in the New Hampshire Democratic primary."
And that says something profound about the impact Sanders' message is having on voters who know about him and understand the platform he's running on. As Jon Green at AmericaBlog explains on Wednesday morning:
when Suffolk asked respondents who weren't supporting Clinton why that was the case, almost as many stated a positive preference for Sanders (10%) as expressed a negative distrust of Clinton (12%). In other words, support for Sanders is more than a mere protest against Clinton; people who are familiar with Sanders like what he has to say. A lot.
While polls in other early primary states show Clinton with a clear and commanding lead, Sanders has maintained for weeks that he is going to win New Hampshire, his home state of Vermont's next-door neighbor. These series of polls show that, with more than six months left until the primary takes place, he has plenty of time to close the gap and prove himself right.
Earlier this week, a survey conducted by Morning Consult showed Sanders standing at 32 percent among likely voters, just twelve points behind Clinton's 44 percent.
While Green said he "wouldn't go as far as to say that two polls from one state in early June make for a plausible path to victory," Sanders' early performance in New Hampshire suggests there is an opening for Sanders to turn the primary season into a meaningful race.
"The less Hillary Clinton says on issues progressives care about," said Green, "and the more Bernie keeps being Bernie, the more momentum we'll see him pick up."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.