Protesters at an anti-Right to Work rally in 2014. Critics of the legislation have long said it has a detrimental effect on wages. (Photo: Light Brigading/flickr/cc)
Apr 22, 2015
Contradicting arguments typically used to advance so-called Right to Work legislation, new research from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows that wages and benefits are actually lower in states with such anti-worker laws on the books.
The paper, released as part of EPI's Raising America's Pay project, finds that the negative impact of Right to Work (RTW) laws--which undercut unions by allowing workers to benefit from collective bargaining without having to pay dues--translates to $1,558 less a year in earnings for a typical full-time worker.
"Collective bargaining is a clear way to raise wages, and Right to Work laws undercut it."
--Will Kimball, Economic Policy Institute
Wages in RTW states are 3.1 percent lower than those in non-RTW states, after controlling for individual demographic and socioeconomic factors as well as state macroeconomic indicators, according to EPI senior economist Elise Gould and research assistant Will Kimball.
In a news release, Gould put it starkly: "It's abundantly clear that Right to Work laws are negatively correlated with workers' wages."
In addition, EPI reports that workers in RTW states are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or pension coverage.
"At their core, RTW laws seek to hamstring unions' ability to help employees bargain with their employers for better wages, benefits, and working conditions," explain Gould and Kimball in their introduction. "Given that unionization raises wages both for individual union members as well as for nonunion workers in unionized sectors, it is not surprising that research shows that both union and nonunion workers in RTW states have lower wages and fewer benefits, on average, than comparable workers in other states."
Right to Work laws are currently in place in 25 states, including Wisconsin, where Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed a controversial RTW bill in early March--saying it was "the right thing to do for job creators and employees alike." Lawmakers in Illinois, Kentucky, New Mexico, and West Virginia are considering similar legislation.
But rather than enacting policies that act as a drag on workers and the economy, politicians should pursue a different approach, Kimball said.
"Policymakers who are concerned by the three-and-a-half decades of wage stagnation that have plagued American workers should be trying to strengthen unions," he advised. "Collective bargaining is a clear way to raise wages, and Right to Work laws undercut it."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Contradicting arguments typically used to advance so-called Right to Work legislation, new research from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows that wages and benefits are actually lower in states with such anti-worker laws on the books.
The paper, released as part of EPI's Raising America's Pay project, finds that the negative impact of Right to Work (RTW) laws--which undercut unions by allowing workers to benefit from collective bargaining without having to pay dues--translates to $1,558 less a year in earnings for a typical full-time worker.
"Collective bargaining is a clear way to raise wages, and Right to Work laws undercut it."
--Will Kimball, Economic Policy Institute
Wages in RTW states are 3.1 percent lower than those in non-RTW states, after controlling for individual demographic and socioeconomic factors as well as state macroeconomic indicators, according to EPI senior economist Elise Gould and research assistant Will Kimball.
In a news release, Gould put it starkly: "It's abundantly clear that Right to Work laws are negatively correlated with workers' wages."
In addition, EPI reports that workers in RTW states are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or pension coverage.
"At their core, RTW laws seek to hamstring unions' ability to help employees bargain with their employers for better wages, benefits, and working conditions," explain Gould and Kimball in their introduction. "Given that unionization raises wages both for individual union members as well as for nonunion workers in unionized sectors, it is not surprising that research shows that both union and nonunion workers in RTW states have lower wages and fewer benefits, on average, than comparable workers in other states."
Right to Work laws are currently in place in 25 states, including Wisconsin, where Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed a controversial RTW bill in early March--saying it was "the right thing to do for job creators and employees alike." Lawmakers in Illinois, Kentucky, New Mexico, and West Virginia are considering similar legislation.
But rather than enacting policies that act as a drag on workers and the economy, politicians should pursue a different approach, Kimball said.
"Policymakers who are concerned by the three-and-a-half decades of wage stagnation that have plagued American workers should be trying to strengthen unions," he advised. "Collective bargaining is a clear way to raise wages, and Right to Work laws undercut it."
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
Contradicting arguments typically used to advance so-called Right to Work legislation, new research from the Economic Policy Institute (EPI) shows that wages and benefits are actually lower in states with such anti-worker laws on the books.
The paper, released as part of EPI's Raising America's Pay project, finds that the negative impact of Right to Work (RTW) laws--which undercut unions by allowing workers to benefit from collective bargaining without having to pay dues--translates to $1,558 less a year in earnings for a typical full-time worker.
"Collective bargaining is a clear way to raise wages, and Right to Work laws undercut it."
--Will Kimball, Economic Policy Institute
Wages in RTW states are 3.1 percent lower than those in non-RTW states, after controlling for individual demographic and socioeconomic factors as well as state macroeconomic indicators, according to EPI senior economist Elise Gould and research assistant Will Kimball.
In a news release, Gould put it starkly: "It's abundantly clear that Right to Work laws are negatively correlated with workers' wages."
In addition, EPI reports that workers in RTW states are less likely to have employer-sponsored health insurance or pension coverage.
"At their core, RTW laws seek to hamstring unions' ability to help employees bargain with their employers for better wages, benefits, and working conditions," explain Gould and Kimball in their introduction. "Given that unionization raises wages both for individual union members as well as for nonunion workers in unionized sectors, it is not surprising that research shows that both union and nonunion workers in RTW states have lower wages and fewer benefits, on average, than comparable workers in other states."
Right to Work laws are currently in place in 25 states, including Wisconsin, where Republican Gov. Scott Walker signed a controversial RTW bill in early March--saying it was "the right thing to do for job creators and employees alike." Lawmakers in Illinois, Kentucky, New Mexico, and West Virginia are considering similar legislation.
But rather than enacting policies that act as a drag on workers and the economy, politicians should pursue a different approach, Kimball said.
"Policymakers who are concerned by the three-and-a-half decades of wage stagnation that have plagued American workers should be trying to strengthen unions," he advised. "Collective bargaining is a clear way to raise wages, and Right to Work laws undercut it."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.