SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Among the 42 pieces of data that would be collected under the European Commission's plan: payment information, home and billing addresses, and "special service requests, such as meal preferences." (Photo: JuntosWorldwide/flickr/cc)
In Response To Attacks, Sweeping Data Collection To Be Proposed for EU Airports
Of the proposal's alleged privacy protections, civil liberties advocate says: 'It is a joke. They are not safeguards.'
Jan 28, 2015
A new European Commission counterterrorism plan to be published on Wednesday would require 42 separate pieces of information on every passenger flying in and out of Europe, including their bank card details and home address, to be stored on a central database for up to five years for access by the police and security services, according to exclusive Guardian reporting.
While the plan's designers say safeguards are in place to protect personal privacy, civil liberties advocates immediately spoke out against the proposal.
Of the alleged protections, Jan Philipp Albrecht, vice-chairman of the European Parliament's civil liberties committee, told the Guardian: "It is a joke. They are not safeguards. Depersonalization does not make the data anonymous. All they have to do is ask a senior officer for the identity to be revealed."
"It is an open breach of fundamental rights to blanketly retain all passenger data," Albrecht said, citing a recent European court of justice ruling that blanket collection of personal data without detailed safeguards is a severe incursion on personal privacy.
The plan comes as a response to this month's Paris attacks. It is a reworked version of a proposal put forth--and shot down by the civil liberties committee--two years ago.
The Guardian reports:
European interior ministers, including the home secretary, Theresa May, who has been pushing the issue most strongly, agreed in Paris on the day of the "Je Suis Charlie" unity march that their main counter-terrorism priority in tracking foreign fighters was to overturn the European parliament's opposition to the plan.
They issued a joint statement saying there was a "crucial and urgent need to move toward an European passenger name record system" and immediate progress will be on the agenda when EU interior ministers meet in Riga on Thursday.
Just this week, the top human rights organization in Europe issued a report saying mass surveillance programs threaten fundamental human rights and may do more harm than good in the fight against terrorism.
And on Wednesday, the U.K.-based watchdog group Privacy International noted that eight separate regional and international bodies "have pronounced...mass surveillance a gross violation of human rights."
"Faced with all this evidence, outrage, and demand for change, one would think that our leaders would be moving toward some reform," Privacy International legal director Carly Nyst writes. "Sadly, we have seen the opposite."
Nyst also took her criticism of the proposed counter-terror plan to Twitter:
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
A new European Commission counterterrorism plan to be published on Wednesday would require 42 separate pieces of information on every passenger flying in and out of Europe, including their bank card details and home address, to be stored on a central database for up to five years for access by the police and security services, according to exclusive Guardian reporting.
While the plan's designers say safeguards are in place to protect personal privacy, civil liberties advocates immediately spoke out against the proposal.
Of the alleged protections, Jan Philipp Albrecht, vice-chairman of the European Parliament's civil liberties committee, told the Guardian: "It is a joke. They are not safeguards. Depersonalization does not make the data anonymous. All they have to do is ask a senior officer for the identity to be revealed."
"It is an open breach of fundamental rights to blanketly retain all passenger data," Albrecht said, citing a recent European court of justice ruling that blanket collection of personal data without detailed safeguards is a severe incursion on personal privacy.
The plan comes as a response to this month's Paris attacks. It is a reworked version of a proposal put forth--and shot down by the civil liberties committee--two years ago.
The Guardian reports:
European interior ministers, including the home secretary, Theresa May, who has been pushing the issue most strongly, agreed in Paris on the day of the "Je Suis Charlie" unity march that their main counter-terrorism priority in tracking foreign fighters was to overturn the European parliament's opposition to the plan.
They issued a joint statement saying there was a "crucial and urgent need to move toward an European passenger name record system" and immediate progress will be on the agenda when EU interior ministers meet in Riga on Thursday.
Just this week, the top human rights organization in Europe issued a report saying mass surveillance programs threaten fundamental human rights and may do more harm than good in the fight against terrorism.
And on Wednesday, the U.K.-based watchdog group Privacy International noted that eight separate regional and international bodies "have pronounced...mass surveillance a gross violation of human rights."
"Faced with all this evidence, outrage, and demand for change, one would think that our leaders would be moving toward some reform," Privacy International legal director Carly Nyst writes. "Sadly, we have seen the opposite."
Nyst also took her criticism of the proposed counter-terror plan to Twitter:
Deirdre Fulton
Deirdre Fulton is a former Common Dreams senior editor and staff writer. Previously she worked as an editor and writer for the Portland Phoenix and the Boston Phoenix, where she was honored by the New England Press Association and the Association of Alternative Newsweeklies. A Boston University graduate, Deirdre is a co-founder of the Maine-based Lorem Ipsum Theater Collective and the PortFringe theater festival. She writes young adult fiction in her spare time.
A new European Commission counterterrorism plan to be published on Wednesday would require 42 separate pieces of information on every passenger flying in and out of Europe, including their bank card details and home address, to be stored on a central database for up to five years for access by the police and security services, according to exclusive Guardian reporting.
While the plan's designers say safeguards are in place to protect personal privacy, civil liberties advocates immediately spoke out against the proposal.
Of the alleged protections, Jan Philipp Albrecht, vice-chairman of the European Parliament's civil liberties committee, told the Guardian: "It is a joke. They are not safeguards. Depersonalization does not make the data anonymous. All they have to do is ask a senior officer for the identity to be revealed."
"It is an open breach of fundamental rights to blanketly retain all passenger data," Albrecht said, citing a recent European court of justice ruling that blanket collection of personal data without detailed safeguards is a severe incursion on personal privacy.
The plan comes as a response to this month's Paris attacks. It is a reworked version of a proposal put forth--and shot down by the civil liberties committee--two years ago.
The Guardian reports:
European interior ministers, including the home secretary, Theresa May, who has been pushing the issue most strongly, agreed in Paris on the day of the "Je Suis Charlie" unity march that their main counter-terrorism priority in tracking foreign fighters was to overturn the European parliament's opposition to the plan.
They issued a joint statement saying there was a "crucial and urgent need to move toward an European passenger name record system" and immediate progress will be on the agenda when EU interior ministers meet in Riga on Thursday.
Just this week, the top human rights organization in Europe issued a report saying mass surveillance programs threaten fundamental human rights and may do more harm than good in the fight against terrorism.
And on Wednesday, the U.K.-based watchdog group Privacy International noted that eight separate regional and international bodies "have pronounced...mass surveillance a gross violation of human rights."
"Faced with all this evidence, outrage, and demand for change, one would think that our leaders would be moving toward some reform," Privacy International legal director Carly Nyst writes. "Sadly, we have seen the opposite."
Nyst also took her criticism of the proposed counter-terror plan to Twitter:
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.