James Risen told Democracy Now in October that he believes that a "major part" of President Obama's legacy will be his attempt to "erode press freedom in the United States." (Screenshot: Democracy Now!)
DOJ Says It Will Subpoena NYT Reporter James Risen
Given the Justice Department's extensive investigation into Risen, journalist's attorney questions whether prosecution will really limit questioning
The United States government has confirmed that it will seek limited testimony from New York Times reporter James Risen, according to court documents filed Tuesday, in regards to his relationship with the alleged CIA leaker Jeffery Sterling.
Ahead of the official filing, press freedom advocates had welcomed the news that the Department of Justice would not press the journalist to expose the anonymous source or sources for his 2006 book, State of War.
According to the Justice Department filing (pdf), Holder has authorized prosecutors to seek Risen's testimony in regards to the facts that Risen has a confidentiality agreement with his source or sources for his book, as well as for two earlier New York Times articles, and that Risen had a previous "non-confidential reporter-source relationship" with Jeffrey Sterling. Sterling is accused of leaking information related to a botched CIA mission to sabotage Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program, which Risen writes about in his book.
Risen's attorney, Joel Kurtzberg, told the Alexandria, Virginia court on Tuesday that although Risen had expressed willingness to confirm some of that information previously, he was unsure if his client would comply in this case. The federal government's pursuit of Risen has become a battle over the First Amendment rights of journalists and, according to advocates, threatens the ability of reporters to promise confidentiality to sources.
Reporting on the hearing, Politico reporter Josh Gerstein, who has followed the Risen case closely, wrote that Kurtzberg "made clear that whatever questions Risen ultimately answers would ultimately be under compulsion of a subpoena."
"He's certainly not volunteering to be here," Kurtzberg told the court.
Further, according the Washington Post: "Edward B. MacMahon Jr., Sterling's attorney, said he was just reviewing the prosecutors' filing, but he noted that their investigation into Risen was extensive and said the idea of limited questioning of the reporter was 'hard for us to fathom at this point in time.' He said prosecutors had obtained Risen's FedEx records, credit card receipts and even some type of Western Union transaction to at least one of his children."
It was also noted during the hearing that the DOJ filing did not specify whether defense lawyers would be limited in their questioning of Risen.
Investigative journalist Marcy Wheeler speculates that the government may be hoping that Sterling's defense team will demand Risen's complete testimony in an effort to keep Sterling out of prison.
Kurtzberg did confirm that Risen would attend a January 5th hearing, which the court called a "moot of Mr. Risen's testimony," during which the court can determine "exactly what questions Mr. Risen will answer [...] without burdening the jury's time."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. The final deadline for our crucial Summer Campaign fundraising drive is just days away, and we’re falling short of our must-hit goal. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The United States government has confirmed that it will seek limited testimony from New York Times reporter James Risen, according to court documents filed Tuesday, in regards to his relationship with the alleged CIA leaker Jeffery Sterling.
Ahead of the official filing, press freedom advocates had welcomed the news that the Department of Justice would not press the journalist to expose the anonymous source or sources for his 2006 book, State of War.
According to the Justice Department filing (pdf), Holder has authorized prosecutors to seek Risen's testimony in regards to the facts that Risen has a confidentiality agreement with his source or sources for his book, as well as for two earlier New York Times articles, and that Risen had a previous "non-confidential reporter-source relationship" with Jeffrey Sterling. Sterling is accused of leaking information related to a botched CIA mission to sabotage Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program, which Risen writes about in his book.
Risen's attorney, Joel Kurtzberg, told the Alexandria, Virginia court on Tuesday that although Risen had expressed willingness to confirm some of that information previously, he was unsure if his client would comply in this case. The federal government's pursuit of Risen has become a battle over the First Amendment rights of journalists and, according to advocates, threatens the ability of reporters to promise confidentiality to sources.
Reporting on the hearing, Politico reporter Josh Gerstein, who has followed the Risen case closely, wrote that Kurtzberg "made clear that whatever questions Risen ultimately answers would ultimately be under compulsion of a subpoena."
"He's certainly not volunteering to be here," Kurtzberg told the court.
Further, according the Washington Post: "Edward B. MacMahon Jr., Sterling's attorney, said he was just reviewing the prosecutors' filing, but he noted that their investigation into Risen was extensive and said the idea of limited questioning of the reporter was 'hard for us to fathom at this point in time.' He said prosecutors had obtained Risen's FedEx records, credit card receipts and even some type of Western Union transaction to at least one of his children."
It was also noted during the hearing that the DOJ filing did not specify whether defense lawyers would be limited in their questioning of Risen.
Investigative journalist Marcy Wheeler speculates that the government may be hoping that Sterling's defense team will demand Risen's complete testimony in an effort to keep Sterling out of prison.
Kurtzberg did confirm that Risen would attend a January 5th hearing, which the court called a "moot of Mr. Risen's testimony," during which the court can determine "exactly what questions Mr. Risen will answer [...] without burdening the jury's time."
The United States government has confirmed that it will seek limited testimony from New York Times reporter James Risen, according to court documents filed Tuesday, in regards to his relationship with the alleged CIA leaker Jeffery Sterling.
Ahead of the official filing, press freedom advocates had welcomed the news that the Department of Justice would not press the journalist to expose the anonymous source or sources for his 2006 book, State of War.
According to the Justice Department filing (pdf), Holder has authorized prosecutors to seek Risen's testimony in regards to the facts that Risen has a confidentiality agreement with his source or sources for his book, as well as for two earlier New York Times articles, and that Risen had a previous "non-confidential reporter-source relationship" with Jeffrey Sterling. Sterling is accused of leaking information related to a botched CIA mission to sabotage Iran's alleged nuclear weapons program, which Risen writes about in his book.
Risen's attorney, Joel Kurtzberg, told the Alexandria, Virginia court on Tuesday that although Risen had expressed willingness to confirm some of that information previously, he was unsure if his client would comply in this case. The federal government's pursuit of Risen has become a battle over the First Amendment rights of journalists and, according to advocates, threatens the ability of reporters to promise confidentiality to sources.
Reporting on the hearing, Politico reporter Josh Gerstein, who has followed the Risen case closely, wrote that Kurtzberg "made clear that whatever questions Risen ultimately answers would ultimately be under compulsion of a subpoena."
"He's certainly not volunteering to be here," Kurtzberg told the court.
Further, according the Washington Post: "Edward B. MacMahon Jr., Sterling's attorney, said he was just reviewing the prosecutors' filing, but he noted that their investigation into Risen was extensive and said the idea of limited questioning of the reporter was 'hard for us to fathom at this point in time.' He said prosecutors had obtained Risen's FedEx records, credit card receipts and even some type of Western Union transaction to at least one of his children."
It was also noted during the hearing that the DOJ filing did not specify whether defense lawyers would be limited in their questioning of Risen.
Investigative journalist Marcy Wheeler speculates that the government may be hoping that Sterling's defense team will demand Risen's complete testimony in an effort to keep Sterling out of prison.
Kurtzberg did confirm that Risen would attend a January 5th hearing, which the court called a "moot of Mr. Risen's testimony," during which the court can determine "exactly what questions Mr. Risen will answer [...] without burdening the jury's time."