Obama's Oil Boom Destroying Hope for Progress on Climate
Accused of projecting 'false image,' US fossil fuel exports eclipsing climate gains
Much heralded efforts to curb global warming by cutting carbon emissions are being effectively cancelled out by the export of fossil fuels and their related pollution which, according to an Associated Press analysis published Monday, have "soared" under President Obama.
U.S. exports of gasoline and diesel, which have doubled during Obama's tenure, have released roughly 1 billion tons of carbon pollution into the atmosphere between 2008 and 2013, according to the analysis. These emissions, notes AP investigative reporter Dina Cappielo, "more than made up for" the 475 million tons in emission reductions credited to strengthened environmental standards passed during that time.
"Obama is putting his entire climate legacy at risk by letting fossil fuel production (and exports) expand unchecked," 350.org cofounder Jamie Henn wrote in response to the new analysis.
"There is no clear accounting of what America's growth as a fossil-fuel powerhouse is doing to the global-warming picture," writes Cappielo, referring to the domestic oil and gas boom which has jump-started U.S. fossil fuel exports in recent years. Cappielo notes that pending trade agreements and current energy export projects, such as proposed liquid natural gas export facilities or West Coast coal terminals, which are due to increase exported emissions, could also be included in the tabulation.
Further, much of that fuel is exported to countries with lower efficiency standards, worsening its impact on the atmosphere.
The scrutiny over the amount of emissions being outsourced by the United States comes as world leaders continue to meet at the United Nations climate talks in Lima, Peru this week, where the U.S. has faced criticism for its non-binding climate commitment with China. The United States has championed their own emissions reductions as an argument against the need for a legally binding agreement.
"It's a false image," Onel Masardule of the Peru-based Indigenous People's Biocultural Climate Change Assessment Initiative, told AP. "In reality, the U.S is still contaminating."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Much heralded efforts to curb global warming by cutting carbon emissions are being effectively cancelled out by the export of fossil fuels and their related pollution which, according to an Associated Press analysis published Monday, have "soared" under President Obama.
U.S. exports of gasoline and diesel, which have doubled during Obama's tenure, have released roughly 1 billion tons of carbon pollution into the atmosphere between 2008 and 2013, according to the analysis. These emissions, notes AP investigative reporter Dina Cappielo, "more than made up for" the 475 million tons in emission reductions credited to strengthened environmental standards passed during that time.
"Obama is putting his entire climate legacy at risk by letting fossil fuel production (and exports) expand unchecked," 350.org cofounder Jamie Henn wrote in response to the new analysis.
"There is no clear accounting of what America's growth as a fossil-fuel powerhouse is doing to the global-warming picture," writes Cappielo, referring to the domestic oil and gas boom which has jump-started U.S. fossil fuel exports in recent years. Cappielo notes that pending trade agreements and current energy export projects, such as proposed liquid natural gas export facilities or West Coast coal terminals, which are due to increase exported emissions, could also be included in the tabulation.
Further, much of that fuel is exported to countries with lower efficiency standards, worsening its impact on the atmosphere.
The scrutiny over the amount of emissions being outsourced by the United States comes as world leaders continue to meet at the United Nations climate talks in Lima, Peru this week, where the U.S. has faced criticism for its non-binding climate commitment with China. The United States has championed their own emissions reductions as an argument against the need for a legally binding agreement.
"It's a false image," Onel Masardule of the Peru-based Indigenous People's Biocultural Climate Change Assessment Initiative, told AP. "In reality, the U.S is still contaminating."
Much heralded efforts to curb global warming by cutting carbon emissions are being effectively cancelled out by the export of fossil fuels and their related pollution which, according to an Associated Press analysis published Monday, have "soared" under President Obama.
U.S. exports of gasoline and diesel, which have doubled during Obama's tenure, have released roughly 1 billion tons of carbon pollution into the atmosphere between 2008 and 2013, according to the analysis. These emissions, notes AP investigative reporter Dina Cappielo, "more than made up for" the 475 million tons in emission reductions credited to strengthened environmental standards passed during that time.
"Obama is putting his entire climate legacy at risk by letting fossil fuel production (and exports) expand unchecked," 350.org cofounder Jamie Henn wrote in response to the new analysis.
"There is no clear accounting of what America's growth as a fossil-fuel powerhouse is doing to the global-warming picture," writes Cappielo, referring to the domestic oil and gas boom which has jump-started U.S. fossil fuel exports in recent years. Cappielo notes that pending trade agreements and current energy export projects, such as proposed liquid natural gas export facilities or West Coast coal terminals, which are due to increase exported emissions, could also be included in the tabulation.
Further, much of that fuel is exported to countries with lower efficiency standards, worsening its impact on the atmosphere.
The scrutiny over the amount of emissions being outsourced by the United States comes as world leaders continue to meet at the United Nations climate talks in Lima, Peru this week, where the U.S. has faced criticism for its non-binding climate commitment with China. The United States has championed their own emissions reductions as an argument against the need for a legally binding agreement.
"It's a false image," Onel Masardule of the Peru-based Indigenous People's Biocultural Climate Change Assessment Initiative, told AP. "In reality, the U.S is still contaminating."