With Global Tensions High, Experts Say Threat of Nuclear War Must Be Sharply Curbed
Prominent figures from 46 countries sign open letter to kick off Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons
The world must work together to ameliorate the rising danger of nuclear war, experts from 46 countries declared in an open letter released ahead of Monday's kick-off of the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons.
"We believe the risks posed by nuclear weapons and the international dynamics that could lead to nuclear weapons being used are under-estimated or insufficiently understood by world leaders," reads the statement, which commends the government of Austria for convening the conference.
Organized by the European Leadership Network--and signed by former diplomats, lawmakers, and others--the letter argues, "Tensions between nuclear-armed states and alliances in the Euro-Atlantic area and in both South and East Asia remain ripe with the potential for military miscalculation and escalations. In a vestige of the Cold War, too many nuclear weapons in the world remain ready to launch on a short notice, greatly increasing the chances of an accident."
The letter calls for international leaders to "use the Vienna Conference to launch a global discussion that would more accurately assess steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of intentional or unintentional use of nuclear weapons."
However, civil society organizations from around the world, who gathered before the Vienna conference at a summit organized by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, are taking it a step further and calling for a complete ban on nuclear arms. A global prohibition is "a humanitarian imperative that cannot be delayed," reads a statement from organizers released ahead of their forum.
Numerous countries have refused to attend the Vienna meeting of approximately 150 countries, which is the third of its kind. Israel, which is the only Middle East country in possession of nuclear weapons, is shunning the gathering. Russia, France and China--all of whom possess nuclear weapons--are also refusing to attend.
After staying away from previous meetings, Britain and the United States are both attending this conference. However, the state department announced last month that the U.S. will not engage in any "disarmament negotiations or pre-negotiation discussions."
Dr. Joseph Gerson, director of the Peace and Economic Security Programme at the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), recently shared his predictions for the conference with Inter Press Service.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The world must work together to ameliorate the rising danger of nuclear war, experts from 46 countries declared in an open letter released ahead of Monday's kick-off of the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons.
"We believe the risks posed by nuclear weapons and the international dynamics that could lead to nuclear weapons being used are under-estimated or insufficiently understood by world leaders," reads the statement, which commends the government of Austria for convening the conference.
Organized by the European Leadership Network--and signed by former diplomats, lawmakers, and others--the letter argues, "Tensions between nuclear-armed states and alliances in the Euro-Atlantic area and in both South and East Asia remain ripe with the potential for military miscalculation and escalations. In a vestige of the Cold War, too many nuclear weapons in the world remain ready to launch on a short notice, greatly increasing the chances of an accident."
The letter calls for international leaders to "use the Vienna Conference to launch a global discussion that would more accurately assess steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of intentional or unintentional use of nuclear weapons."
However, civil society organizations from around the world, who gathered before the Vienna conference at a summit organized by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, are taking it a step further and calling for a complete ban on nuclear arms. A global prohibition is "a humanitarian imperative that cannot be delayed," reads a statement from organizers released ahead of their forum.
Numerous countries have refused to attend the Vienna meeting of approximately 150 countries, which is the third of its kind. Israel, which is the only Middle East country in possession of nuclear weapons, is shunning the gathering. Russia, France and China--all of whom possess nuclear weapons--are also refusing to attend.
After staying away from previous meetings, Britain and the United States are both attending this conference. However, the state department announced last month that the U.S. will not engage in any "disarmament negotiations or pre-negotiation discussions."
Dr. Joseph Gerson, director of the Peace and Economic Security Programme at the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), recently shared his predictions for the conference with Inter Press Service.
The world must work together to ameliorate the rising danger of nuclear war, experts from 46 countries declared in an open letter released ahead of Monday's kick-off of the Vienna Conference on the Humanitarian Impact of Nuclear Weapons.
"We believe the risks posed by nuclear weapons and the international dynamics that could lead to nuclear weapons being used are under-estimated or insufficiently understood by world leaders," reads the statement, which commends the government of Austria for convening the conference.
Organized by the European Leadership Network--and signed by former diplomats, lawmakers, and others--the letter argues, "Tensions between nuclear-armed states and alliances in the Euro-Atlantic area and in both South and East Asia remain ripe with the potential for military miscalculation and escalations. In a vestige of the Cold War, too many nuclear weapons in the world remain ready to launch on a short notice, greatly increasing the chances of an accident."
The letter calls for international leaders to "use the Vienna Conference to launch a global discussion that would more accurately assess steps to reduce or eliminate the risk of intentional or unintentional use of nuclear weapons."
However, civil society organizations from around the world, who gathered before the Vienna conference at a summit organized by the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons, are taking it a step further and calling for a complete ban on nuclear arms. A global prohibition is "a humanitarian imperative that cannot be delayed," reads a statement from organizers released ahead of their forum.
Numerous countries have refused to attend the Vienna meeting of approximately 150 countries, which is the third of its kind. Israel, which is the only Middle East country in possession of nuclear weapons, is shunning the gathering. Russia, France and China--all of whom possess nuclear weapons--are also refusing to attend.
After staying away from previous meetings, Britain and the United States are both attending this conference. However, the state department announced last month that the U.S. will not engage in any "disarmament negotiations or pre-negotiation discussions."
Dr. Joseph Gerson, director of the Peace and Economic Security Programme at the American Friends Service Committee (AFSC), recently shared his predictions for the conference with Inter Press Service.