SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Swedish Court Rejects Julian Assange Appeal to Lift Warrant
WikiLeaks founder still faces extradition if he leaves Ecuadorian embassy in London
Nov 20, 2014
An appeals court in Sweden on Thursday rejected WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's appeal to have his arrest warrant lifted, which means he is still subject to extradition if he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been living in asylum since 2012.
"There is no reason to set aside the detention solely because Julian Assange is in an embassy and the detention order cannot be enforced at present for that reason," the Svea Court of Appeal in Stockholm said in a statement on Thursday. "In making this assessment, account must be taken of the fact that Julian Assange is suspected of crimes of a relatively serious nature."
The court added that there is "great risk" Assange would flee and evade legal proceedings if the warrant is lifted.
Police have sought Assange for four years on sexual assault and rape allegations, which he has continuously denied. Assange, who has not been formally indicted, has said that he fears extradition to Sweden because it may lead to him being sent to the U.S., where he faces charges over the release of classified government documents exposing U.S. war crimes and other misdeeds. Chelsea Manning, the American soldier who obtained and passed along those files, was sentenced to 35 years in prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas for her role in the leak.
However, the court also put pressure on Swedish prosecutors to complete their investigation, saying that their probe into the allegations had stalled and that their continued deadlock "is not in line with their obligation--in the interests of everyone concerned--to move the preliminary investigation forward."
Assange and his lawyers have repeatedly offered for Swedish prosecutors to come to London to speak with Assange, which would simultaneously ensure his safety and allow for the investigation to move forward, but that request has been continuously denied.
According to the Guardian:
Per Samuelsson, one of Assange's lawyers in Stockholm, said the court's criticism of the prosecutor was aimed at her refusal to come to London to question Assange. "This is crucial because the court said we were right in the wording, but not in the court's actual decision," he said....
"Swedish and international law is on our side," Samuelsson told the Guardian. "The ruling shows we are on the right track, but unfortunately the court of appeal did not have the courage to overturn the arrest warrant."
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
An appeals court in Sweden on Thursday rejected WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's appeal to have his arrest warrant lifted, which means he is still subject to extradition if he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been living in asylum since 2012.
"There is no reason to set aside the detention solely because Julian Assange is in an embassy and the detention order cannot be enforced at present for that reason," the Svea Court of Appeal in Stockholm said in a statement on Thursday. "In making this assessment, account must be taken of the fact that Julian Assange is suspected of crimes of a relatively serious nature."
The court added that there is "great risk" Assange would flee and evade legal proceedings if the warrant is lifted.
Police have sought Assange for four years on sexual assault and rape allegations, which he has continuously denied. Assange, who has not been formally indicted, has said that he fears extradition to Sweden because it may lead to him being sent to the U.S., where he faces charges over the release of classified government documents exposing U.S. war crimes and other misdeeds. Chelsea Manning, the American soldier who obtained and passed along those files, was sentenced to 35 years in prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas for her role in the leak.
However, the court also put pressure on Swedish prosecutors to complete their investigation, saying that their probe into the allegations had stalled and that their continued deadlock "is not in line with their obligation--in the interests of everyone concerned--to move the preliminary investigation forward."
Assange and his lawyers have repeatedly offered for Swedish prosecutors to come to London to speak with Assange, which would simultaneously ensure his safety and allow for the investigation to move forward, but that request has been continuously denied.
According to the Guardian:
Per Samuelsson, one of Assange's lawyers in Stockholm, said the court's criticism of the prosecutor was aimed at her refusal to come to London to question Assange. "This is crucial because the court said we were right in the wording, but not in the court's actual decision," he said....
"Swedish and international law is on our side," Samuelsson told the Guardian. "The ruling shows we are on the right track, but unfortunately the court of appeal did not have the courage to overturn the arrest warrant."
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
An appeals court in Sweden on Thursday rejected WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange's appeal to have his arrest warrant lifted, which means he is still subject to extradition if he leaves the Ecuadorian embassy in London, where he has been living in asylum since 2012.
"There is no reason to set aside the detention solely because Julian Assange is in an embassy and the detention order cannot be enforced at present for that reason," the Svea Court of Appeal in Stockholm said in a statement on Thursday. "In making this assessment, account must be taken of the fact that Julian Assange is suspected of crimes of a relatively serious nature."
The court added that there is "great risk" Assange would flee and evade legal proceedings if the warrant is lifted.
Police have sought Assange for four years on sexual assault and rape allegations, which he has continuously denied. Assange, who has not been formally indicted, has said that he fears extradition to Sweden because it may lead to him being sent to the U.S., where he faces charges over the release of classified government documents exposing U.S. war crimes and other misdeeds. Chelsea Manning, the American soldier who obtained and passed along those files, was sentenced to 35 years in prison in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas for her role in the leak.
However, the court also put pressure on Swedish prosecutors to complete their investigation, saying that their probe into the allegations had stalled and that their continued deadlock "is not in line with their obligation--in the interests of everyone concerned--to move the preliminary investigation forward."
Assange and his lawyers have repeatedly offered for Swedish prosecutors to come to London to speak with Assange, which would simultaneously ensure his safety and allow for the investigation to move forward, but that request has been continuously denied.
According to the Guardian:
Per Samuelsson, one of Assange's lawyers in Stockholm, said the court's criticism of the prosecutor was aimed at her refusal to come to London to question Assange. "This is crucial because the court said we were right in the wording, but not in the court's actual decision," he said....
"Swedish and international law is on our side," Samuelsson told the Guardian. "The ruling shows we are on the right track, but unfortunately the court of appeal did not have the courage to overturn the arrest warrant."
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.