Tar Sands Resistance Blowing Huge Hole in Oil Industry's Bottom Line: Report
'Business as usual for Big Oil—particularly in the tar sands—is over.'
The growing tide of tar sands resistance--seen in blockades, tree sits, petitions, education efforts and calls to divest--is having a measurable negative impact on the bottom line of the tar sands industry, according to a new report, prompting researchers to declare that "business as usual for tar sands is over."
Published Wednesday by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis and Oil Change International, the report, Material Risks: How Public Accountability Is Slowing Tar Sands Development (pdf), finds that tar sands production revenues were down about $30.9 billion from 2010 through 2013. And according to the report, more than half of that lost revenue, roughly $17 billion, can be attributed to the fierce grassroots campaigns that have sprung up throughout North America in the past few years.
Led in large part by the Keystone XL resistance effort, anti-tar sands campaigns have created numerous delays and cancelled projects which have successfully impacted the bottom line for Canadian oil producers and drilling companies.
"Lack of market access, caused in large part by public accountability actions driven by pipeline campaigns, has played a significant role in the cancellation of three major tar sands projects in 2014 alone: Shell's Pierre River, Total's Joslyn North, and Statoil's Corner Project," notes the report, which is the first in a series of collaborative papers on the tar sands industry to be published by the groups.
Further, the report notes that capital expenditure into tar sands projects are declining while 9 of 10 leading tar sands producers in Canada have underperformed in the broader stock market in the last five years. Meanwhile, financial analysts have recently downgraded their outlook for tar sands production, once estimated to be as much as 4.8 million barrels per days.
"It just so happens that if your business model is predicated on rapid expansion of some of the world's highest carbon oil, then having an impact on your bottom line is one way to keep carbon in the ground."
--Hannah McKinnon, Oil Change International
"Industry officials never anticipated the level and intensity of public opposition to their massive build-out plans," said Steve Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, in a press statement. "Public opposition has caused government and its administrative agencies to take a second and third look. Legal and other challenges are raising new issues related to environmental protection, indigenous rights and the disruptive impact of new pipeline proposals."
As report co-author Hannah McKinnon notes, the point of the tar sands resistance campaign "is not to bankrupt the oil industry, it is to protect our climate, and anything that depends on it (i.e. everything), as well as support the front line communities that face the impacts of this industry every single day."
However, she adds, "It just so happens that if your business model is predicated on rapid expansion of some of the world's highest carbon oil, then having an impact on your bottom line is one way to keep carbon in the ground."
Protests against pipelines is slowly tar sands development and thus "changing the bottom line for the tar sands industry," Kretzmann adds. "Business as usual for Big Oil--particularly in the tar sands--is over."
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just three days to go in our Spring Campaign, we're falling short of our make-or-break goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The growing tide of tar sands resistance--seen in blockades, tree sits, petitions, education efforts and calls to divest--is having a measurable negative impact on the bottom line of the tar sands industry, according to a new report, prompting researchers to declare that "business as usual for tar sands is over."
Published Wednesday by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis and Oil Change International, the report, Material Risks: How Public Accountability Is Slowing Tar Sands Development (pdf), finds that tar sands production revenues were down about $30.9 billion from 2010 through 2013. And according to the report, more than half of that lost revenue, roughly $17 billion, can be attributed to the fierce grassroots campaigns that have sprung up throughout North America in the past few years.
Led in large part by the Keystone XL resistance effort, anti-tar sands campaigns have created numerous delays and cancelled projects which have successfully impacted the bottom line for Canadian oil producers and drilling companies.
"Lack of market access, caused in large part by public accountability actions driven by pipeline campaigns, has played a significant role in the cancellation of three major tar sands projects in 2014 alone: Shell's Pierre River, Total's Joslyn North, and Statoil's Corner Project," notes the report, which is the first in a series of collaborative papers on the tar sands industry to be published by the groups.
Further, the report notes that capital expenditure into tar sands projects are declining while 9 of 10 leading tar sands producers in Canada have underperformed in the broader stock market in the last five years. Meanwhile, financial analysts have recently downgraded their outlook for tar sands production, once estimated to be as much as 4.8 million barrels per days.
"It just so happens that if your business model is predicated on rapid expansion of some of the world's highest carbon oil, then having an impact on your bottom line is one way to keep carbon in the ground."
--Hannah McKinnon, Oil Change International
"Industry officials never anticipated the level and intensity of public opposition to their massive build-out plans," said Steve Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, in a press statement. "Public opposition has caused government and its administrative agencies to take a second and third look. Legal and other challenges are raising new issues related to environmental protection, indigenous rights and the disruptive impact of new pipeline proposals."
As report co-author Hannah McKinnon notes, the point of the tar sands resistance campaign "is not to bankrupt the oil industry, it is to protect our climate, and anything that depends on it (i.e. everything), as well as support the front line communities that face the impacts of this industry every single day."
However, she adds, "It just so happens that if your business model is predicated on rapid expansion of some of the world's highest carbon oil, then having an impact on your bottom line is one way to keep carbon in the ground."
Protests against pipelines is slowly tar sands development and thus "changing the bottom line for the tar sands industry," Kretzmann adds. "Business as usual for Big Oil--particularly in the tar sands--is over."
The growing tide of tar sands resistance--seen in blockades, tree sits, petitions, education efforts and calls to divest--is having a measurable negative impact on the bottom line of the tar sands industry, according to a new report, prompting researchers to declare that "business as usual for tar sands is over."
Published Wednesday by the Institute for Energy Economics and Financial Analysis and Oil Change International, the report, Material Risks: How Public Accountability Is Slowing Tar Sands Development (pdf), finds that tar sands production revenues were down about $30.9 billion from 2010 through 2013. And according to the report, more than half of that lost revenue, roughly $17 billion, can be attributed to the fierce grassroots campaigns that have sprung up throughout North America in the past few years.
Led in large part by the Keystone XL resistance effort, anti-tar sands campaigns have created numerous delays and cancelled projects which have successfully impacted the bottom line for Canadian oil producers and drilling companies.
"Lack of market access, caused in large part by public accountability actions driven by pipeline campaigns, has played a significant role in the cancellation of three major tar sands projects in 2014 alone: Shell's Pierre River, Total's Joslyn North, and Statoil's Corner Project," notes the report, which is the first in a series of collaborative papers on the tar sands industry to be published by the groups.
Further, the report notes that capital expenditure into tar sands projects are declining while 9 of 10 leading tar sands producers in Canada have underperformed in the broader stock market in the last five years. Meanwhile, financial analysts have recently downgraded their outlook for tar sands production, once estimated to be as much as 4.8 million barrels per days.
"It just so happens that if your business model is predicated on rapid expansion of some of the world's highest carbon oil, then having an impact on your bottom line is one way to keep carbon in the ground."
--Hannah McKinnon, Oil Change International
"Industry officials never anticipated the level and intensity of public opposition to their massive build-out plans," said Steve Kretzmann, Executive Director of Oil Change International, in a press statement. "Public opposition has caused government and its administrative agencies to take a second and third look. Legal and other challenges are raising new issues related to environmental protection, indigenous rights and the disruptive impact of new pipeline proposals."
As report co-author Hannah McKinnon notes, the point of the tar sands resistance campaign "is not to bankrupt the oil industry, it is to protect our climate, and anything that depends on it (i.e. everything), as well as support the front line communities that face the impacts of this industry every single day."
However, she adds, "It just so happens that if your business model is predicated on rapid expansion of some of the world's highest carbon oil, then having an impact on your bottom line is one way to keep carbon in the ground."
Protests against pipelines is slowly tar sands development and thus "changing the bottom line for the tar sands industry," Kretzmann adds. "Business as usual for Big Oil--particularly in the tar sands--is over."