An image of Washington's NFL team logo (Photo: Keith Allison)
Aug 25, 2014
Sports announcers will not have to say the name of Washington's professional football team on the air while commentating on games, ESPN said Saturday.
ESPN made the decision after Keith Olbermann challenged the sports network to institute a policy similar to that which has been adopted by publications like the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, Slate, and the Washington City Paper, as well as channels like CBS Sports. The controversial name has been slammed by civil rights and athletic organizations alike for its ethnic stereotyping of Native Americans.
"Our consistent company policy will continue: using official names and marks as presented by the teams, leagues and conferences we cover," ESPN said in a statement. "We do, however, recognize the debate over the use of 'Washington Redskins' and have afforded individuals the opportunity to decide how they will use those words when reporting on the team."
Olbermann called on ESPN to change its policy after numerous sports announcers, including CBS' Phil Simms and Greg Gumbel and NBC's Tony Dungy, announced that they would not use the NFL team name in the future. ESPN's Tom Jackson, an NFL analyst, was apparently planning to stop saying it before the network made their own announcement.
"Not to be totally self-referential and like it or not, ESPN is the conduit of sports in this country," Olbermann said. "It is also loath to be the news. On the other hand, the number of words I and all of my colleagues cannot say on the air is justifiably long. And frankly, many of them are way less offensive than is the name of the Washington team."
"It is my opinion, and like my friend Greg Gumbel said I'm just one person with one thought about it, but I think it is time for us here, officially, or just like Gumbel and Simms and Dungy, to stop using the name," Olbermann said.
Other ESPN analysts and commentators have previously denounced the Washington team's name, including Bill Simmons and Dan Graziano, but this weekend was the first time that the network officially changed its policy in response to widespread criticism. The new direction sees ESPN joining all other major broadcasters in giving their announcers the option of avoiding the name.
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Sports announcers will not have to say the name of Washington's professional football team on the air while commentating on games, ESPN said Saturday.
ESPN made the decision after Keith Olbermann challenged the sports network to institute a policy similar to that which has been adopted by publications like the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, Slate, and the Washington City Paper, as well as channels like CBS Sports. The controversial name has been slammed by civil rights and athletic organizations alike for its ethnic stereotyping of Native Americans.
"Our consistent company policy will continue: using official names and marks as presented by the teams, leagues and conferences we cover," ESPN said in a statement. "We do, however, recognize the debate over the use of 'Washington Redskins' and have afforded individuals the opportunity to decide how they will use those words when reporting on the team."
Olbermann called on ESPN to change its policy after numerous sports announcers, including CBS' Phil Simms and Greg Gumbel and NBC's Tony Dungy, announced that they would not use the NFL team name in the future. ESPN's Tom Jackson, an NFL analyst, was apparently planning to stop saying it before the network made their own announcement.
"Not to be totally self-referential and like it or not, ESPN is the conduit of sports in this country," Olbermann said. "It is also loath to be the news. On the other hand, the number of words I and all of my colleagues cannot say on the air is justifiably long. And frankly, many of them are way less offensive than is the name of the Washington team."
"It is my opinion, and like my friend Greg Gumbel said I'm just one person with one thought about it, but I think it is time for us here, officially, or just like Gumbel and Simms and Dungy, to stop using the name," Olbermann said.
Other ESPN analysts and commentators have previously denounced the Washington team's name, including Bill Simmons and Dan Graziano, but this weekend was the first time that the network officially changed its policy in response to widespread criticism. The new direction sees ESPN joining all other major broadcasters in giving their announcers the option of avoiding the name.
Nadia Prupis
Nadia Prupis is a former Common Dreams staff writer. She wrote on media policy for Truthout.org and has been published in New America Media and AlterNet. She graduated from UC Santa Barbara with a BA in English in 2008.
Sports announcers will not have to say the name of Washington's professional football team on the air while commentating on games, ESPN said Saturday.
ESPN made the decision after Keith Olbermann challenged the sports network to institute a policy similar to that which has been adopted by publications like the Washington Post, the San Francisco Chronicle, Slate, and the Washington City Paper, as well as channels like CBS Sports. The controversial name has been slammed by civil rights and athletic organizations alike for its ethnic stereotyping of Native Americans.
"Our consistent company policy will continue: using official names and marks as presented by the teams, leagues and conferences we cover," ESPN said in a statement. "We do, however, recognize the debate over the use of 'Washington Redskins' and have afforded individuals the opportunity to decide how they will use those words when reporting on the team."
Olbermann called on ESPN to change its policy after numerous sports announcers, including CBS' Phil Simms and Greg Gumbel and NBC's Tony Dungy, announced that they would not use the NFL team name in the future. ESPN's Tom Jackson, an NFL analyst, was apparently planning to stop saying it before the network made their own announcement.
"Not to be totally self-referential and like it or not, ESPN is the conduit of sports in this country," Olbermann said. "It is also loath to be the news. On the other hand, the number of words I and all of my colleagues cannot say on the air is justifiably long. And frankly, many of them are way less offensive than is the name of the Washington team."
"It is my opinion, and like my friend Greg Gumbel said I'm just one person with one thought about it, but I think it is time for us here, officially, or just like Gumbel and Simms and Dungy, to stop using the name," Olbermann said.
Other ESPN analysts and commentators have previously denounced the Washington team's name, including Bill Simmons and Dan Graziano, but this weekend was the first time that the network officially changed its policy in response to widespread criticism. The new direction sees ESPN joining all other major broadcasters in giving their announcers the option of avoiding the name.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.