

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Hunger strikes against segregated housing, unsanitary water, lack of access to the International Committee of the Red Cross, and more have swept the U.S. military's Bagram prison in Afghanistan, journalist Spencer Ackerman revealed Wednesday in the Guardian.
News of the protests offers a rare glimpse into a prison that operates behind a wall of military secrecy, with even the identities of the 38 non-Afghan men held by the U.S. concealed from the public.
The strikes were confirmed by Abdul Sattar, who hails from Pakistan and was formerly held at the prison for approximately 2.5 years before being released in May. Sattar told the Guardian that he participated in five or six hunger strikes, which decreased his body weight by 55 pounds.
According to Sattar, the strikes take aim at specific grievances, last for finite amounts of time, and in some instances included all of the non-Afghan men held at Bagram, as well as some Afghan detainees, who are technically under Afghan control. "This was the way we could protest and get things done that we wanted. The Americans did not want to talk to us, they never sat with us around the table to discuss the problems with us," he told the Guardian. Sattar said he knew of one to two cases in which hunger strikers were forcibly fed.
Ramzi Kassem, a law professor at the City University, is involved in the representation of Amin al-Barki--a Yemeni man currently held in Bagram. While Kassem has difficulty obtaining information about his client, because they are prohibited by the military from speaking privately, he told the Guardian that al-Barki has gone on hunger strike more than once to protest his ongoing detention despite being cleared for release.
Bagram, which has been referred to as the "Forgotten Guantanamo," is notorious for torture and abuse, including sleep deprivation, sexual humiliation, and beatings. Men held there are denied regular and confidential access to lawyers and are denied the right to challenge their incarceration.
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Hunger strikes against segregated housing, unsanitary water, lack of access to the International Committee of the Red Cross, and more have swept the U.S. military's Bagram prison in Afghanistan, journalist Spencer Ackerman revealed Wednesday in the Guardian.
News of the protests offers a rare glimpse into a prison that operates behind a wall of military secrecy, with even the identities of the 38 non-Afghan men held by the U.S. concealed from the public.
The strikes were confirmed by Abdul Sattar, who hails from Pakistan and was formerly held at the prison for approximately 2.5 years before being released in May. Sattar told the Guardian that he participated in five or six hunger strikes, which decreased his body weight by 55 pounds.
According to Sattar, the strikes take aim at specific grievances, last for finite amounts of time, and in some instances included all of the non-Afghan men held at Bagram, as well as some Afghan detainees, who are technically under Afghan control. "This was the way we could protest and get things done that we wanted. The Americans did not want to talk to us, they never sat with us around the table to discuss the problems with us," he told the Guardian. Sattar said he knew of one to two cases in which hunger strikers were forcibly fed.
Ramzi Kassem, a law professor at the City University, is involved in the representation of Amin al-Barki--a Yemeni man currently held in Bagram. While Kassem has difficulty obtaining information about his client, because they are prohibited by the military from speaking privately, he told the Guardian that al-Barki has gone on hunger strike more than once to protest his ongoing detention despite being cleared for release.
Bagram, which has been referred to as the "Forgotten Guantanamo," is notorious for torture and abuse, including sleep deprivation, sexual humiliation, and beatings. Men held there are denied regular and confidential access to lawyers and are denied the right to challenge their incarceration.
_____________________
Hunger strikes against segregated housing, unsanitary water, lack of access to the International Committee of the Red Cross, and more have swept the U.S. military's Bagram prison in Afghanistan, journalist Spencer Ackerman revealed Wednesday in the Guardian.
News of the protests offers a rare glimpse into a prison that operates behind a wall of military secrecy, with even the identities of the 38 non-Afghan men held by the U.S. concealed from the public.
The strikes were confirmed by Abdul Sattar, who hails from Pakistan and was formerly held at the prison for approximately 2.5 years before being released in May. Sattar told the Guardian that he participated in five or six hunger strikes, which decreased his body weight by 55 pounds.
According to Sattar, the strikes take aim at specific grievances, last for finite amounts of time, and in some instances included all of the non-Afghan men held at Bagram, as well as some Afghan detainees, who are technically under Afghan control. "This was the way we could protest and get things done that we wanted. The Americans did not want to talk to us, they never sat with us around the table to discuss the problems with us," he told the Guardian. Sattar said he knew of one to two cases in which hunger strikers were forcibly fed.
Ramzi Kassem, a law professor at the City University, is involved in the representation of Amin al-Barki--a Yemeni man currently held in Bagram. While Kassem has difficulty obtaining information about his client, because they are prohibited by the military from speaking privately, he told the Guardian that al-Barki has gone on hunger strike more than once to protest his ongoing detention despite being cleared for release.
Bagram, which has been referred to as the "Forgotten Guantanamo," is notorious for torture and abuse, including sleep deprivation, sexual humiliation, and beatings. Men held there are denied regular and confidential access to lawyers and are denied the right to challenge their incarceration.
_____________________