US Spending Billions to 'Dig Ourselves a Bigger Climate Hole'
New report highlights continued fossil fuel subsidies that foster further climate crisis at taxpayers' expense
Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have reached levels not seen before in human history, and climate scientists have warned that the world is on track to exceed the warming threshold of 2 degrees Celsuis.
But despite his statement that "we have a moral obligation" to act on climate change, President Barack Obama has embraced an "All of the Above" energy strategy that still clings to and in fact incentivizes fossil fuels.
A new report (pdf) from research and advocacy organization Oil Change International reveals that the United States is pouring $21.6 billion into subsidies for fossil fuel exploration and production each year.
"While scientists implore world leaders to leave fossil fuels in the ground to avoid a climate catastrophe, our analysis has found that billions upon billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are going to digging ourselves a bigger climate hole every year," stated David Turnbull, Campaigns Director of Oil Change International. "Rather than putting down the shovel, our government is using even more taxpayer dollars to buy a backhoe."
The report states that since Obama took office in 2009, these subsides have increased 45 percent.
Obama has, however, included in all his budget proposals provisions to remove some of the federal fossil fuel subsidies. The report states that those left out "$12.4 billion in annual federal subsidies that directly and indirectly benefit the fossil fuel industry." Yet even those meager efforts have failed to pass Congress--perhaps an unsurprising outcome in the face of the hundreds of millions of dollars the fossil fuel industry has spent on lobbying efforts and campaign finance contributions.
From the report:
[F]or every $1 that fossil fuel companies spent on lobbying and campaign finance contributions to Congress, it got over $100 back in subsidies - that's a more than 10,000 percent return on investment.
Among the "worst of the worst" subsidies the report states are "two major U.S. subsidies aimed directly at encouraging exploration [that] totaled $136 million in 2013 alone." These were tax deduction allowances so that coal companies could deduct their exploration costs and oil and gas companies could deduct seismic survey and exploratory drilling costs from income tax payments.
Other fossil fuel enabling polices the report notes include allowing companies to deduct costs of oil spill clean-up from tax payments as a "standard business expense"--a practice that added up to $679 million in 2013, and allowing tar sands producers to be exempt from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which allows them to avoid the 8 cents per barrel tax into the Fund. This added up to 44 million, the report found.
Adding another $10.5 to $500 billion each year is the military spending in order for the U.S. to "defend overseas oil interests." Additionally, the report finds that U.S. taxpayers are stuck with the fossil fuel industry's bill for environmental and public health costs like air and land pollution, which adds up to as much as $302 billion per year.
"The science is clear that at least two-thirds of proven fossil fuel reserves need to stay in the ground to avoid catastrophic climate impacts," stated report author Shakuntala Makhijani. "It is time for the U.S. government to show leadership and immediately end the massive subsidies that encourage their production."
__________________________
We are at a crossroads
This country and this world are at a monumental crossroads. US voters have an opportunity to beat back the forces of fascism and confront the billionaires who are rigging the economy, our media system, and our democracy, making it increasingly impossible for ordinary people to get by. We’re not just talking about the election. We’re talking about what must be done once these fascist elements are vanquished from power. We need a bolder set of solutions than what either major party has so far been willing to offer and a working-class movement ready to fight like hell for it. Trump didn't emerge from nowhere. The conditions that fueled MAGA authoritarianism were created by decades of radical neoliberal economic policies and a corrupt political system dominated by corporate interests. They slashed taxes on the super-rich, promising that the benefits would trickle down. They said giveaways to the corporate titans would make life more affordable for the rest of us. It was all bullshit. And when a bitter, betrayed populace searches for someone to blame, right-wing demagogues have little trouble finding scapegoats. People know when they're being lied to, but you won't hear any of this from the corporate media. Only independent journalism—powered and funded by people who believe in building a better world—can deliver truly trustworthy daily news. Our Fall Campaign is underway, and we need your help. To power our newsroom through the rest of the year, we need to raise $125,000 by midnight on October 31. So if you share our vision, please contribute whatever you can to sustain our work. |
Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have reached levels not seen before in human history, and climate scientists have warned that the world is on track to exceed the warming threshold of 2 degrees Celsuis.
But despite his statement that "we have a moral obligation" to act on climate change, President Barack Obama has embraced an "All of the Above" energy strategy that still clings to and in fact incentivizes fossil fuels.
A new report (pdf) from research and advocacy organization Oil Change International reveals that the United States is pouring $21.6 billion into subsidies for fossil fuel exploration and production each year.
"While scientists implore world leaders to leave fossil fuels in the ground to avoid a climate catastrophe, our analysis has found that billions upon billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are going to digging ourselves a bigger climate hole every year," stated David Turnbull, Campaigns Director of Oil Change International. "Rather than putting down the shovel, our government is using even more taxpayer dollars to buy a backhoe."
The report states that since Obama took office in 2009, these subsides have increased 45 percent.
Obama has, however, included in all his budget proposals provisions to remove some of the federal fossil fuel subsidies. The report states that those left out "$12.4 billion in annual federal subsidies that directly and indirectly benefit the fossil fuel industry." Yet even those meager efforts have failed to pass Congress--perhaps an unsurprising outcome in the face of the hundreds of millions of dollars the fossil fuel industry has spent on lobbying efforts and campaign finance contributions.
From the report:
[F]or every $1 that fossil fuel companies spent on lobbying and campaign finance contributions to Congress, it got over $100 back in subsidies - that's a more than 10,000 percent return on investment.
Among the "worst of the worst" subsidies the report states are "two major U.S. subsidies aimed directly at encouraging exploration [that] totaled $136 million in 2013 alone." These were tax deduction allowances so that coal companies could deduct their exploration costs and oil and gas companies could deduct seismic survey and exploratory drilling costs from income tax payments.
Other fossil fuel enabling polices the report notes include allowing companies to deduct costs of oil spill clean-up from tax payments as a "standard business expense"--a practice that added up to $679 million in 2013, and allowing tar sands producers to be exempt from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which allows them to avoid the 8 cents per barrel tax into the Fund. This added up to 44 million, the report found.
Adding another $10.5 to $500 billion each year is the military spending in order for the U.S. to "defend overseas oil interests." Additionally, the report finds that U.S. taxpayers are stuck with the fossil fuel industry's bill for environmental and public health costs like air and land pollution, which adds up to as much as $302 billion per year.
"The science is clear that at least two-thirds of proven fossil fuel reserves need to stay in the ground to avoid catastrophic climate impacts," stated report author Shakuntala Makhijani. "It is time for the U.S. government to show leadership and immediately end the massive subsidies that encourage their production."
__________________________
Levels of carbon dioxide in the atmosphere have reached levels not seen before in human history, and climate scientists have warned that the world is on track to exceed the warming threshold of 2 degrees Celsuis.
But despite his statement that "we have a moral obligation" to act on climate change, President Barack Obama has embraced an "All of the Above" energy strategy that still clings to and in fact incentivizes fossil fuels.
A new report (pdf) from research and advocacy organization Oil Change International reveals that the United States is pouring $21.6 billion into subsidies for fossil fuel exploration and production each year.
"While scientists implore world leaders to leave fossil fuels in the ground to avoid a climate catastrophe, our analysis has found that billions upon billions of U.S. taxpayer dollars are going to digging ourselves a bigger climate hole every year," stated David Turnbull, Campaigns Director of Oil Change International. "Rather than putting down the shovel, our government is using even more taxpayer dollars to buy a backhoe."
The report states that since Obama took office in 2009, these subsides have increased 45 percent.
Obama has, however, included in all his budget proposals provisions to remove some of the federal fossil fuel subsidies. The report states that those left out "$12.4 billion in annual federal subsidies that directly and indirectly benefit the fossil fuel industry." Yet even those meager efforts have failed to pass Congress--perhaps an unsurprising outcome in the face of the hundreds of millions of dollars the fossil fuel industry has spent on lobbying efforts and campaign finance contributions.
From the report:
[F]or every $1 that fossil fuel companies spent on lobbying and campaign finance contributions to Congress, it got over $100 back in subsidies - that's a more than 10,000 percent return on investment.
Among the "worst of the worst" subsidies the report states are "two major U.S. subsidies aimed directly at encouraging exploration [that] totaled $136 million in 2013 alone." These were tax deduction allowances so that coal companies could deduct their exploration costs and oil and gas companies could deduct seismic survey and exploratory drilling costs from income tax payments.
Other fossil fuel enabling polices the report notes include allowing companies to deduct costs of oil spill clean-up from tax payments as a "standard business expense"--a practice that added up to $679 million in 2013, and allowing tar sands producers to be exempt from the Oil Spill Liability Trust Fund, which allows them to avoid the 8 cents per barrel tax into the Fund. This added up to 44 million, the report found.
Adding another $10.5 to $500 billion each year is the military spending in order for the U.S. to "defend overseas oil interests." Additionally, the report finds that U.S. taxpayers are stuck with the fossil fuel industry's bill for environmental and public health costs like air and land pollution, which adds up to as much as $302 billion per year.
"The science is clear that at least two-thirds of proven fossil fuel reserves need to stay in the ground to avoid catastrophic climate impacts," stated report author Shakuntala Makhijani. "It is time for the U.S. government to show leadership and immediately end the massive subsidies that encourage their production."
__________________________