'Big Oil Playbook' on Display in Small Town Tar Sands Fight
Industry-backed opponents show up en masse at local meeting, forcing tar sands vote to be rescheduled.
Exemplifying tactics outlined in a new report that dissects the oil industry's efforts to influence the tar sands debate, members of a Big Oil front group packed a city council meeting in South Portland, Maine, on Monday night, forcing the meeting to be rescheduled.
The council was slated to take its first vote on the Clear Skies Ordinance, which would prohibit loading crude oil in bulk onto marine tank vessels in Portland Harbor and building or expanding terminals and other facilities for that purpose. While its ultimate aim remains the same--to keep tar sands oil out of the city--the proposal has a much narrower scope than the Waterfront Protection Ordinance that city voters rejected by a small margin last November, and is therefore expected to be less vulnerable to public opposition and court challenges.
But half an hour before Monday's meeting was scheduled to start, the council chamber in the small coastal city was already overflowing; supporters (who wore sky-blue shirts) were surprised to encounter so many opponents wearing red shirts that read, "American Energy" on the front and "SoPo Jobs" on the back. At 7:30 pm, Mayor Gerry Jalbert announced that due to safety concerns the meeting would have to be postponed.
"We're disappointed that the oil industry came in at the 11th hour with people who don't live in our city to shut down the City Council's meeting," said Mary Jane Ferrier, spokesperson for Protect South Portland, a citizen's advocacy organization. "But we're not at all deterred and will be back in two nights to encourage the City Council to pass this straightforward ordinance to keep toxic tar sands out of our city."
Opponents of the ordinance also took out an ad in local newspapers this week, claiming that the ordinance "puts thousands of South Portland jobs at risk." The ad directs readers to sopojobs.com, a site maintained by Energy Citizens, itself an "astroturf" organization supported by the American Petroleum Institute, according to the Center for Media and Democracy's SourceWatch.
All of this seems ripped from the pages of Inside the Big Oil Playbook: Strategies and Tactics Used in the Industry's Battle to Ship Tar Sands Oil Out of Casco Bay, a report released last week by EnvironmentMaine, which describes it as "a case study of the tools and tactics Big Oil has already used, and can be expected to use in the future, to keep alive the possibility of shipping tar sands oil through Maine, other U.S. states, and large swaths of Canada."
The Playbook describes the strategies employed to defeat the Waterfront Protection Ordinance, and counsels that similar tactics will be used both in Maine and elsewhere as fossil fuel companies attempt to expand the market for tar sands oil. Activists can expect Big Oil to:
- Spend big on consulting, advertising, and get-out-the-vote efforts
- Downplay the role of Big Oil
- Deny the existence of plans to bring tar sands into the region
- "Manufacture and play up economic fears"
"Given its success in South Portland, Big Oil can be expected to employ some of the same tactics it used during its anti-ordinance campaign last fall to influence decision-makers and the public in South Portland and beyond," the report reads. "It is critical that elected officials and the public understand Big Oil's playbook as the industry attempts to meet its massive expansion plans to more than double tar sands production by 2030."
_____________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Exemplifying tactics outlined in a new report that dissects the oil industry's efforts to influence the tar sands debate, members of a Big Oil front group packed a city council meeting in South Portland, Maine, on Monday night, forcing the meeting to be rescheduled.
The council was slated to take its first vote on the Clear Skies Ordinance, which would prohibit loading crude oil in bulk onto marine tank vessels in Portland Harbor and building or expanding terminals and other facilities for that purpose. While its ultimate aim remains the same--to keep tar sands oil out of the city--the proposal has a much narrower scope than the Waterfront Protection Ordinance that city voters rejected by a small margin last November, and is therefore expected to be less vulnerable to public opposition and court challenges.
But half an hour before Monday's meeting was scheduled to start, the council chamber in the small coastal city was already overflowing; supporters (who wore sky-blue shirts) were surprised to encounter so many opponents wearing red shirts that read, "American Energy" on the front and "SoPo Jobs" on the back. At 7:30 pm, Mayor Gerry Jalbert announced that due to safety concerns the meeting would have to be postponed.
"We're disappointed that the oil industry came in at the 11th hour with people who don't live in our city to shut down the City Council's meeting," said Mary Jane Ferrier, spokesperson for Protect South Portland, a citizen's advocacy organization. "But we're not at all deterred and will be back in two nights to encourage the City Council to pass this straightforward ordinance to keep toxic tar sands out of our city."
Opponents of the ordinance also took out an ad in local newspapers this week, claiming that the ordinance "puts thousands of South Portland jobs at risk." The ad directs readers to sopojobs.com, a site maintained by Energy Citizens, itself an "astroturf" organization supported by the American Petroleum Institute, according to the Center for Media and Democracy's SourceWatch.
All of this seems ripped from the pages of Inside the Big Oil Playbook: Strategies and Tactics Used in the Industry's Battle to Ship Tar Sands Oil Out of Casco Bay, a report released last week by EnvironmentMaine, which describes it as "a case study of the tools and tactics Big Oil has already used, and can be expected to use in the future, to keep alive the possibility of shipping tar sands oil through Maine, other U.S. states, and large swaths of Canada."
The Playbook describes the strategies employed to defeat the Waterfront Protection Ordinance, and counsels that similar tactics will be used both in Maine and elsewhere as fossil fuel companies attempt to expand the market for tar sands oil. Activists can expect Big Oil to:
- Spend big on consulting, advertising, and get-out-the-vote efforts
- Downplay the role of Big Oil
- Deny the existence of plans to bring tar sands into the region
- "Manufacture and play up economic fears"
"Given its success in South Portland, Big Oil can be expected to employ some of the same tactics it used during its anti-ordinance campaign last fall to influence decision-makers and the public in South Portland and beyond," the report reads. "It is critical that elected officials and the public understand Big Oil's playbook as the industry attempts to meet its massive expansion plans to more than double tar sands production by 2030."
_____________________
Exemplifying tactics outlined in a new report that dissects the oil industry's efforts to influence the tar sands debate, members of a Big Oil front group packed a city council meeting in South Portland, Maine, on Monday night, forcing the meeting to be rescheduled.
The council was slated to take its first vote on the Clear Skies Ordinance, which would prohibit loading crude oil in bulk onto marine tank vessels in Portland Harbor and building or expanding terminals and other facilities for that purpose. While its ultimate aim remains the same--to keep tar sands oil out of the city--the proposal has a much narrower scope than the Waterfront Protection Ordinance that city voters rejected by a small margin last November, and is therefore expected to be less vulnerable to public opposition and court challenges.
But half an hour before Monday's meeting was scheduled to start, the council chamber in the small coastal city was already overflowing; supporters (who wore sky-blue shirts) were surprised to encounter so many opponents wearing red shirts that read, "American Energy" on the front and "SoPo Jobs" on the back. At 7:30 pm, Mayor Gerry Jalbert announced that due to safety concerns the meeting would have to be postponed.
"We're disappointed that the oil industry came in at the 11th hour with people who don't live in our city to shut down the City Council's meeting," said Mary Jane Ferrier, spokesperson for Protect South Portland, a citizen's advocacy organization. "But we're not at all deterred and will be back in two nights to encourage the City Council to pass this straightforward ordinance to keep toxic tar sands out of our city."
Opponents of the ordinance also took out an ad in local newspapers this week, claiming that the ordinance "puts thousands of South Portland jobs at risk." The ad directs readers to sopojobs.com, a site maintained by Energy Citizens, itself an "astroturf" organization supported by the American Petroleum Institute, according to the Center for Media and Democracy's SourceWatch.
All of this seems ripped from the pages of Inside the Big Oil Playbook: Strategies and Tactics Used in the Industry's Battle to Ship Tar Sands Oil Out of Casco Bay, a report released last week by EnvironmentMaine, which describes it as "a case study of the tools and tactics Big Oil has already used, and can be expected to use in the future, to keep alive the possibility of shipping tar sands oil through Maine, other U.S. states, and large swaths of Canada."
The Playbook describes the strategies employed to defeat the Waterfront Protection Ordinance, and counsels that similar tactics will be used both in Maine and elsewhere as fossil fuel companies attempt to expand the market for tar sands oil. Activists can expect Big Oil to:
- Spend big on consulting, advertising, and get-out-the-vote efforts
- Downplay the role of Big Oil
- Deny the existence of plans to bring tar sands into the region
- "Manufacture and play up economic fears"
"Given its success in South Portland, Big Oil can be expected to employ some of the same tactics it used during its anti-ordinance campaign last fall to influence decision-makers and the public in South Portland and beyond," the report reads. "It is critical that elected officials and the public understand Big Oil's playbook as the industry attempts to meet its massive expansion plans to more than double tar sands production by 2030."
_____________________