SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
A sign at a 2013 rally in Connecticut. (photo: cc / flickr / CT Senate Democrats)
Voters in Oregon want to know what's in their food and in November they will be given the chance to have their voices heard.
Food safety advocates on Wednesday submitted over 150,000 signatures, nearly twice the amount required, in support of Ballot Initiative #44, which would require food manufacturers to label foods sold in Oregon that are produced with genetic modified organisms, or GMOs.
Earlier this year, voters in two Oregon counties approved ballot measures to prohibit the cultivation of GMO crops within county borders. In addition, Oregon governor John Kitzhaber signed a bill last year banning GMO canola in the Willamette Valley until 2019.
Should Ballot Initiative #44 pass, Oregon would join three other states (Connecticut, Maine, and Vermont) that have passed GMO labeling measures. As of June 10, 2014, there were 30 pieces of GMO food labeling legislation on the table in 16 states.
The campaign is expected to be a costly one. Last year, food labeling opponents contributed $22 million to help defeat a similar ballot initiative in Washington.
"We don't have any illusions that we're not going to be vastly outspent. We will be," Oregon GMO Right to Know campaign spokesman Sandeep Kaushik told The Oregonian. "We're confident given the strong positive reaction we've had during our signature gathering phase that we can be successful."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Voters in Oregon want to know what's in their food and in November they will be given the chance to have their voices heard.
Food safety advocates on Wednesday submitted over 150,000 signatures, nearly twice the amount required, in support of Ballot Initiative #44, which would require food manufacturers to label foods sold in Oregon that are produced with genetic modified organisms, or GMOs.
Earlier this year, voters in two Oregon counties approved ballot measures to prohibit the cultivation of GMO crops within county borders. In addition, Oregon governor John Kitzhaber signed a bill last year banning GMO canola in the Willamette Valley until 2019.
Should Ballot Initiative #44 pass, Oregon would join three other states (Connecticut, Maine, and Vermont) that have passed GMO labeling measures. As of June 10, 2014, there were 30 pieces of GMO food labeling legislation on the table in 16 states.
The campaign is expected to be a costly one. Last year, food labeling opponents contributed $22 million to help defeat a similar ballot initiative in Washington.
"We don't have any illusions that we're not going to be vastly outspent. We will be," Oregon GMO Right to Know campaign spokesman Sandeep Kaushik told The Oregonian. "We're confident given the strong positive reaction we've had during our signature gathering phase that we can be successful."
_____________________
Voters in Oregon want to know what's in their food and in November they will be given the chance to have their voices heard.
Food safety advocates on Wednesday submitted over 150,000 signatures, nearly twice the amount required, in support of Ballot Initiative #44, which would require food manufacturers to label foods sold in Oregon that are produced with genetic modified organisms, or GMOs.
Earlier this year, voters in two Oregon counties approved ballot measures to prohibit the cultivation of GMO crops within county borders. In addition, Oregon governor John Kitzhaber signed a bill last year banning GMO canola in the Willamette Valley until 2019.
Should Ballot Initiative #44 pass, Oregon would join three other states (Connecticut, Maine, and Vermont) that have passed GMO labeling measures. As of June 10, 2014, there were 30 pieces of GMO food labeling legislation on the table in 16 states.
The campaign is expected to be a costly one. Last year, food labeling opponents contributed $22 million to help defeat a similar ballot initiative in Washington.
"We don't have any illusions that we're not going to be vastly outspent. We will be," Oregon GMO Right to Know campaign spokesman Sandeep Kaushik told The Oregonian. "We're confident given the strong positive reaction we've had during our signature gathering phase that we can be successful."
_____________________