SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
Russell Bucklew shown in this Feb. 9, 2014 photo provided by the Missouri Department of Corrections.
Supreme Court Issues Stay of Execution for Missouri Inmate
Last minute reprieve caps rollercoaster legal battle over potentially "torturous" lethal injection procedure
May 21, 2014
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a stay of execution for Missouri death row inmate Russell Bucklew after a series of legal decisions in the last twenty-four hours saw his fate rollercoaster through the federal court system.
The nation's highest court granted its stay Wednesday morning, giving credence to the arguments of Bucklew's lawyers who say his rare blood condition coupled with secrecy surrounding the lethal injection cocktail now in use by the state of Missouri could lead to "undue suffering" during his execution.
"The state does not have the right to inflict extreme, torturous pain during an execution," said Cheryl Pilate, part of Bucklew's legal team. "We still hope that Mr. Bucklew's grave medical condition and compromised airway will persuade the governor or a court to step back from this extremely risky execution."
The court did not make specific comments on the case, but the stay is in effect until midnight Wednesday and his case in now under their consideration.
According to Reuters, "Bucklew's lawyers argued that malformed blood vessels in his head and neck could rupture under stress, causing the drugs administered during execution to circulate improperly and cause him undue suffering. The condition is called cavernous hemangioma."
Late on Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals granted Bucklew a stay, but that ruling was overturned just hours later when the full court weighed in.
The recent and growing use of unproven drugs used by Missouri and other states has put renewed focus of the national death penalty debate. Oklahoma's use of an un-tested and still-secret combination of narcotics last month resulted in the gruesome "botched" execution of Clayton Lockett. Not alone in this practice, other states have turned to private and undisclosed "compounding agencies" to obtain ingredients for their lethal injections after suppliers in Europe cut off access to drugs traditionally used in the death penalty.
*Correction: This article has been updated to correct a mistake about the location of Bucklew's incarceration.
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a stay of execution for Missouri death row inmate Russell Bucklew after a series of legal decisions in the last twenty-four hours saw his fate rollercoaster through the federal court system.
The nation's highest court granted its stay Wednesday morning, giving credence to the arguments of Bucklew's lawyers who say his rare blood condition coupled with secrecy surrounding the lethal injection cocktail now in use by the state of Missouri could lead to "undue suffering" during his execution.
"The state does not have the right to inflict extreme, torturous pain during an execution," said Cheryl Pilate, part of Bucklew's legal team. "We still hope that Mr. Bucklew's grave medical condition and compromised airway will persuade the governor or a court to step back from this extremely risky execution."
The court did not make specific comments on the case, but the stay is in effect until midnight Wednesday and his case in now under their consideration.
According to Reuters, "Bucklew's lawyers argued that malformed blood vessels in his head and neck could rupture under stress, causing the drugs administered during execution to circulate improperly and cause him undue suffering. The condition is called cavernous hemangioma."
Late on Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals granted Bucklew a stay, but that ruling was overturned just hours later when the full court weighed in.
The recent and growing use of unproven drugs used by Missouri and other states has put renewed focus of the national death penalty debate. Oklahoma's use of an un-tested and still-secret combination of narcotics last month resulted in the gruesome "botched" execution of Clayton Lockett. Not alone in this practice, other states have turned to private and undisclosed "compounding agencies" to obtain ingredients for their lethal injections after suppliers in Europe cut off access to drugs traditionally used in the death penalty.
*Correction: This article has been updated to correct a mistake about the location of Bucklew's incarceration.
The U.S. Supreme Court has issued a stay of execution for Missouri death row inmate Russell Bucklew after a series of legal decisions in the last twenty-four hours saw his fate rollercoaster through the federal court system.
The nation's highest court granted its stay Wednesday morning, giving credence to the arguments of Bucklew's lawyers who say his rare blood condition coupled with secrecy surrounding the lethal injection cocktail now in use by the state of Missouri could lead to "undue suffering" during his execution.
"The state does not have the right to inflict extreme, torturous pain during an execution," said Cheryl Pilate, part of Bucklew's legal team. "We still hope that Mr. Bucklew's grave medical condition and compromised airway will persuade the governor or a court to step back from this extremely risky execution."
The court did not make specific comments on the case, but the stay is in effect until midnight Wednesday and his case in now under their consideration.
According to Reuters, "Bucklew's lawyers argued that malformed blood vessels in his head and neck could rupture under stress, causing the drugs administered during execution to circulate improperly and cause him undue suffering. The condition is called cavernous hemangioma."
Late on Tuesday, a three-judge panel of the U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals granted Bucklew a stay, but that ruling was overturned just hours later when the full court weighed in.
The recent and growing use of unproven drugs used by Missouri and other states has put renewed focus of the national death penalty debate. Oklahoma's use of an un-tested and still-secret combination of narcotics last month resulted in the gruesome "botched" execution of Clayton Lockett. Not alone in this practice, other states have turned to private and undisclosed "compounding agencies" to obtain ingredients for their lethal injections after suppliers in Europe cut off access to drugs traditionally used in the death penalty.
*Correction: This article has been updated to correct a mistake about the location of Bucklew's incarceration.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.