

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
In the first decision of its kind, a federal judge ruled this week that the U.S. government has the authority to force cyber-companies to hand over customers' emails and other digital data, even when that data is stored overseas.
Issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis in New York, the decision pertained to a case in which Microsoft was given a warrant to search the email account of one of its clients whose email data is stored in a server located in Dublin, Ireland.
Microsoft challenged the warrant on the grounds that the U.S. government does not have jurisdiction to search client data held outside of the U.S.
Francis ruled that if the U.S. government were forced to coordinate with other countries and follow their laws when obtaining such data, "the burden on the government would be substantial, and law enforcement efforts would be seriously impeded," Reuters reports.
Yet, Microsoft released a statement arguing, "A U.S. prosecutor cannot obtain a U.S. warrant to search someone's home located in another country, just as another country's prosecutor cannot obtain a court order in her home country to conduct a search in the United States."
The corporation vowed to appeal the decision.
The precedent-setting case is likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise around the world, following the revelations of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Microsoft and other cyber-giants have fallen under a firestorm of criticism following revelations they helped the NSA spy on the internet communications of millions of people.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
In the first decision of its kind, a federal judge ruled this week that the U.S. government has the authority to force cyber-companies to hand over customers' emails and other digital data, even when that data is stored overseas.
Issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis in New York, the decision pertained to a case in which Microsoft was given a warrant to search the email account of one of its clients whose email data is stored in a server located in Dublin, Ireland.
Microsoft challenged the warrant on the grounds that the U.S. government does not have jurisdiction to search client data held outside of the U.S.
Francis ruled that if the U.S. government were forced to coordinate with other countries and follow their laws when obtaining such data, "the burden on the government would be substantial, and law enforcement efforts would be seriously impeded," Reuters reports.
Yet, Microsoft released a statement arguing, "A U.S. prosecutor cannot obtain a U.S. warrant to search someone's home located in another country, just as another country's prosecutor cannot obtain a court order in her home country to conduct a search in the United States."
The corporation vowed to appeal the decision.
The precedent-setting case is likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise around the world, following the revelations of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Microsoft and other cyber-giants have fallen under a firestorm of criticism following revelations they helped the NSA spy on the internet communications of millions of people.
In the first decision of its kind, a federal judge ruled this week that the U.S. government has the authority to force cyber-companies to hand over customers' emails and other digital data, even when that data is stored overseas.
Issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis in New York, the decision pertained to a case in which Microsoft was given a warrant to search the email account of one of its clients whose email data is stored in a server located in Dublin, Ireland.
Microsoft challenged the warrant on the grounds that the U.S. government does not have jurisdiction to search client data held outside of the U.S.
Francis ruled that if the U.S. government were forced to coordinate with other countries and follow their laws when obtaining such data, "the burden on the government would be substantial, and law enforcement efforts would be seriously impeded," Reuters reports.
Yet, Microsoft released a statement arguing, "A U.S. prosecutor cannot obtain a U.S. warrant to search someone's home located in another country, just as another country's prosecutor cannot obtain a court order in her home country to conduct a search in the United States."
The corporation vowed to appeal the decision.
The precedent-setting case is likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise around the world, following the revelations of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Microsoft and other cyber-giants have fallen under a firestorm of criticism following revelations they helped the NSA spy on the internet communications of millions of people.