SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
(Pichi Chuang/Reuters)
US Govt Can Search Private Emails Stored Overseas: Judge
First-of-its-kind ruling likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise following Snowden's revelations
Apr 27, 2014
In the first decision of its kind, a federal judge ruled this week that the U.S. government has the authority to force cyber-companies to hand over customers' emails and other digital data, even when that data is stored overseas.
Issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis in New York, the decision pertained to a case in which Microsoft was given a warrant to search the email account of one of its clients whose email data is stored in a server located in Dublin, Ireland.
Microsoft challenged the warrant on the grounds that the U.S. government does not have jurisdiction to search client data held outside of the U.S.
Francis ruled that if the U.S. government were forced to coordinate with other countries and follow their laws when obtaining such data, "the burden on the government would be substantial, and law enforcement efforts would be seriously impeded," Reuters reports.
Yet, Microsoft released a statement arguing, "A U.S. prosecutor cannot obtain a U.S. warrant to search someone's home located in another country, just as another country's prosecutor cannot obtain a court order in her home country to conduct a search in the United States."
The corporation vowed to appeal the decision.
The precedent-setting case is likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise around the world, following the revelations of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Microsoft and other cyber-giants have fallen under a firestorm of criticism following revelations they helped the NSA spy on the internet communications of millions of people.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In the first decision of its kind, a federal judge ruled this week that the U.S. government has the authority to force cyber-companies to hand over customers' emails and other digital data, even when that data is stored overseas.
Issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis in New York, the decision pertained to a case in which Microsoft was given a warrant to search the email account of one of its clients whose email data is stored in a server located in Dublin, Ireland.
Microsoft challenged the warrant on the grounds that the U.S. government does not have jurisdiction to search client data held outside of the U.S.
Francis ruled that if the U.S. government were forced to coordinate with other countries and follow their laws when obtaining such data, "the burden on the government would be substantial, and law enforcement efforts would be seriously impeded," Reuters reports.
Yet, Microsoft released a statement arguing, "A U.S. prosecutor cannot obtain a U.S. warrant to search someone's home located in another country, just as another country's prosecutor cannot obtain a court order in her home country to conduct a search in the United States."
The corporation vowed to appeal the decision.
The precedent-setting case is likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise around the world, following the revelations of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Microsoft and other cyber-giants have fallen under a firestorm of criticism following revelations they helped the NSA spy on the internet communications of millions of people.
Sarah Lazare
Sarah Lazare was a staff writer for Common Dreams from 2013-2016. She is currently web editor and reporter for In These Times.
In the first decision of its kind, a federal judge ruled this week that the U.S. government has the authority to force cyber-companies to hand over customers' emails and other digital data, even when that data is stored overseas.
Issued by U.S. Magistrate Judge James Francis in New York, the decision pertained to a case in which Microsoft was given a warrant to search the email account of one of its clients whose email data is stored in a server located in Dublin, Ireland.
Microsoft challenged the warrant on the grounds that the U.S. government does not have jurisdiction to search client data held outside of the U.S.
Francis ruled that if the U.S. government were forced to coordinate with other countries and follow their laws when obtaining such data, "the burden on the government would be substantial, and law enforcement efforts would be seriously impeded," Reuters reports.
Yet, Microsoft released a statement arguing, "A U.S. prosecutor cannot obtain a U.S. warrant to search someone's home located in another country, just as another country's prosecutor cannot obtain a court order in her home country to conduct a search in the United States."
The corporation vowed to appeal the decision.
The precedent-setting case is likely to have far-reaching ramifications as concerns over online privacy continue to rise around the world, following the revelations of NSA whistle-blower Edward Snowden.
Microsoft and other cyber-giants have fallen under a firestorm of criticism following revelations they helped the NSA spy on the internet communications of millions of people.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.