SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
The Snowden Effect: Obama, Lawmakers Propose End to NSA Bulk Spying
Existence of NSA's bulk spying program was once a well-guarded secret, but now reforms of some kind seem inevitable
Mar 25, 2014
The existence of the bulk spying effort by the NSA, under what critics call a "stretched" interpretation of Section 215 of the Patriot Act, was a well-guarded secret until leaks provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden to journalists last year put the program in the public spotlight.
Reporting from the New York Times on Tuesday, based on information provided by unnamed "senior White House officials," says that the Obama administration rule changes would force the NSA to "end its systematic collection of data about Americans' calling habits."
Instead of the agency itself automatically collecting all phone records in bulk, according to the Times, the so-called phone metadata records--which include time and place of outgoing calls and their destination--"would stay in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would. And the N.S.A. could obtain specific records only with permission from a judge, using a new kind of court order."
Journalists who have followed the Snowden revelations closely were crediting Snowden for making even the idea of NSA reform possible at the very highest levels of government:
Speaking to the Times, the ACLU's Jameel Jaffer said, "We have many questions about the details, but we agree with the administration that the N.S.A.'s bulk collection of call records should end." He added, "As we've argued since the program was disclosed, the government can track suspected terrorists without placing millions of people under permanent surveillance."
On Monday, the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman acquired a copy of a draft bill now being circulated through the House of Representatives that also seeks to reform the bulk collection program. Called the 'End Bulk Collection Act of 2014,' the bill seems to track closely, in some ways, with the White House proposal and would prevent the NSA from acquiring "records of any electronic communication without the use of specific identifiers or selection terms."
The bill, however, is being co-sponsored by prominent members of the House Intelligence Committee and ardent backers of the NSA, chairman Michael Rogers (R-Michigan) and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Maryland). On the details of the legislation, which could make it easier for the NSA to spy on some Americans, Ackerman reports:
the bill would allow the government to collect electronic communications records based on "reasonable articulable suspicion", rather than probable cause or relevance to a terrorism investigation, from someone deemed to be an agent of a foreign power, associated with an agent of a foreign power, or "in contact with, or known to, a suspected agent of a foreign power."
A draft of the bill acquired by the Guardian proposes the acquisition of such phone or email data for up to a year and would not necessarily require prior approval by a judge. Authorization of the collection would come jointly from the US attorney general and director of national intelligence.
The NSA or the FBI would not be able to collect the content of those communications without probable cause.
Nor does the House intelligence committee's draft bill require phone companies or any other private entity to store bulk phone records on behalf of the NSA - a proposal that has met with stiff opposition from the telecom companies. In essence, the draft bill gets rid of bulk collection, but makes it easier for government authorities to collect metadata on individuals inside the US suspected of involvement with a foreign power.
The House intelligence committee proposal represents competition to a different bill introduced last fall by privacy advocates in the Senate and House judiciary committees known as the USA Freedom Act.
That bill, which has 163 co-sponsors in both chambers, does not lower the legal standard for data collection on US persons, and would prohibit the NSA from searching for Americans' identifying information in its foreign-oriented communications content databases, something the House intelligence bill would not.
A press conference is scheduled for Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill by Ruppersberger and Rogers as they present their new legislation.
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The existence of the bulk spying effort by the NSA, under what critics call a "stretched" interpretation of Section 215 of the Patriot Act, was a well-guarded secret until leaks provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden to journalists last year put the program in the public spotlight.
Reporting from the New York Times on Tuesday, based on information provided by unnamed "senior White House officials," says that the Obama administration rule changes would force the NSA to "end its systematic collection of data about Americans' calling habits."
Instead of the agency itself automatically collecting all phone records in bulk, according to the Times, the so-called phone metadata records--which include time and place of outgoing calls and their destination--"would stay in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would. And the N.S.A. could obtain specific records only with permission from a judge, using a new kind of court order."
Journalists who have followed the Snowden revelations closely were crediting Snowden for making even the idea of NSA reform possible at the very highest levels of government:
Speaking to the Times, the ACLU's Jameel Jaffer said, "We have many questions about the details, but we agree with the administration that the N.S.A.'s bulk collection of call records should end." He added, "As we've argued since the program was disclosed, the government can track suspected terrorists without placing millions of people under permanent surveillance."
On Monday, the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman acquired a copy of a draft bill now being circulated through the House of Representatives that also seeks to reform the bulk collection program. Called the 'End Bulk Collection Act of 2014,' the bill seems to track closely, in some ways, with the White House proposal and would prevent the NSA from acquiring "records of any electronic communication without the use of specific identifiers or selection terms."
The bill, however, is being co-sponsored by prominent members of the House Intelligence Committee and ardent backers of the NSA, chairman Michael Rogers (R-Michigan) and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Maryland). On the details of the legislation, which could make it easier for the NSA to spy on some Americans, Ackerman reports:
the bill would allow the government to collect electronic communications records based on "reasonable articulable suspicion", rather than probable cause or relevance to a terrorism investigation, from someone deemed to be an agent of a foreign power, associated with an agent of a foreign power, or "in contact with, or known to, a suspected agent of a foreign power."
A draft of the bill acquired by the Guardian proposes the acquisition of such phone or email data for up to a year and would not necessarily require prior approval by a judge. Authorization of the collection would come jointly from the US attorney general and director of national intelligence.
The NSA or the FBI would not be able to collect the content of those communications without probable cause.
Nor does the House intelligence committee's draft bill require phone companies or any other private entity to store bulk phone records on behalf of the NSA - a proposal that has met with stiff opposition from the telecom companies. In essence, the draft bill gets rid of bulk collection, but makes it easier for government authorities to collect metadata on individuals inside the US suspected of involvement with a foreign power.
The House intelligence committee proposal represents competition to a different bill introduced last fall by privacy advocates in the Senate and House judiciary committees known as the USA Freedom Act.
That bill, which has 163 co-sponsors in both chambers, does not lower the legal standard for data collection on US persons, and would prohibit the NSA from searching for Americans' identifying information in its foreign-oriented communications content databases, something the House intelligence bill would not.
A press conference is scheduled for Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill by Ruppersberger and Rogers as they present their new legislation.
The existence of the bulk spying effort by the NSA, under what critics call a "stretched" interpretation of Section 215 of the Patriot Act, was a well-guarded secret until leaks provided by whistleblower Edward Snowden to journalists last year put the program in the public spotlight.
Reporting from the New York Times on Tuesday, based on information provided by unnamed "senior White House officials," says that the Obama administration rule changes would force the NSA to "end its systematic collection of data about Americans' calling habits."
Instead of the agency itself automatically collecting all phone records in bulk, according to the Times, the so-called phone metadata records--which include time and place of outgoing calls and their destination--"would stay in the hands of phone companies, which would not be required to retain the data for any longer than they normally would. And the N.S.A. could obtain specific records only with permission from a judge, using a new kind of court order."
Journalists who have followed the Snowden revelations closely were crediting Snowden for making even the idea of NSA reform possible at the very highest levels of government:
Speaking to the Times, the ACLU's Jameel Jaffer said, "We have many questions about the details, but we agree with the administration that the N.S.A.'s bulk collection of call records should end." He added, "As we've argued since the program was disclosed, the government can track suspected terrorists without placing millions of people under permanent surveillance."
On Monday, the Guardian's Spencer Ackerman acquired a copy of a draft bill now being circulated through the House of Representatives that also seeks to reform the bulk collection program. Called the 'End Bulk Collection Act of 2014,' the bill seems to track closely, in some ways, with the White House proposal and would prevent the NSA from acquiring "records of any electronic communication without the use of specific identifiers or selection terms."
The bill, however, is being co-sponsored by prominent members of the House Intelligence Committee and ardent backers of the NSA, chairman Michael Rogers (R-Michigan) and Rep. Dutch Ruppersberger (D-Maryland). On the details of the legislation, which could make it easier for the NSA to spy on some Americans, Ackerman reports:
the bill would allow the government to collect electronic communications records based on "reasonable articulable suspicion", rather than probable cause or relevance to a terrorism investigation, from someone deemed to be an agent of a foreign power, associated with an agent of a foreign power, or "in contact with, or known to, a suspected agent of a foreign power."
A draft of the bill acquired by the Guardian proposes the acquisition of such phone or email data for up to a year and would not necessarily require prior approval by a judge. Authorization of the collection would come jointly from the US attorney general and director of national intelligence.
The NSA or the FBI would not be able to collect the content of those communications without probable cause.
Nor does the House intelligence committee's draft bill require phone companies or any other private entity to store bulk phone records on behalf of the NSA - a proposal that has met with stiff opposition from the telecom companies. In essence, the draft bill gets rid of bulk collection, but makes it easier for government authorities to collect metadata on individuals inside the US suspected of involvement with a foreign power.
The House intelligence committee proposal represents competition to a different bill introduced last fall by privacy advocates in the Senate and House judiciary committees known as the USA Freedom Act.
That bill, which has 163 co-sponsors in both chambers, does not lower the legal standard for data collection on US persons, and would prohibit the NSA from searching for Americans' identifying information in its foreign-oriented communications content databases, something the House intelligence bill would not.
A press conference is scheduled for Tuesday morning on Capitol Hill by Ruppersberger and Rogers as they present their new legislation.
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.