SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The International Criminal Court has been urged to investigate possible war crimes committed by NATO member states for their role in aiding the U.S. drone war in Pakistan.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates that the hundreds of drone strikes the United States has launched on Pakistan since 2004 have killed 416-951 civilians, including as many as 200 children.
NATO members including the UK, Germany and Australia have been linked to providing the U.S. with intelligence used to carry out drone strikes.
The submission brought to the Court includes 13 case studies, UK-based charity Reprieve explained to Common Dreams, including that of Kareem Khan, a Pakistani anti-drone campaigner and journalist whose son and brother were killed in a 2009 drone attack.
Shahzad Akbar, lawyer for Kareem Khan and Director of legal charity the Foundation for Fundamental Rights, described him as "not only a victim, but an important voice for all other civilians killed and injured by US drone strikes."
Khan, who has sued the CIA over the drone attack, was abducted two weeks ago in Pakistan ahead of a planned meeting with members of the UK, German and Dutch Parliaments and testimony at the ICC. He was released after a week, during which time he said he was tortured and interrogated about his investigations of U.S. drone strikes.
"There can surely be no doubt that facilitating the deaths of thousands of civilians - as NATO allies are doing in a plethora of ways - constitutes war crimes," Kat Craig, Reprieve's legal director, said in a statement.
"The International Criminal Court, established specifically to hold overwhelming state power to account, is in a unique position to offer some semblance of justice to individual drone victims with nowhere else to go. They must take this complaint seriously and investigate," Craig stated.
___________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, The U.S. is on a fast track to authoritarianism like nothing I've ever seen. Meanwhile, corporate news outlets are utterly capitulating to Trump, twisting their coverage to avoid drawing his ire while lining up to stuff cash in his pockets. That's why I believe that Common Dreams is doing the best and most consequential reporting that we've ever done. Our small but mighty team is a progressive reporting powerhouse, covering the news every day that the corporate media never will. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. And to ignite change for the common good. Now here's the key piece that I want all our readers to understand: None of this would be possible without your financial support. That's not just some fundraising cliche. It's the absolute and literal truth. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. Will you donate now to help power the nonprofit, independent reporting of Common Dreams? Thank you for being a vital member of our community. Together, we can keep independent journalism alive when it’s needed most. - Craig Brown, Co-founder |
The International Criminal Court has been urged to investigate possible war crimes committed by NATO member states for their role in aiding the U.S. drone war in Pakistan.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates that the hundreds of drone strikes the United States has launched on Pakistan since 2004 have killed 416-951 civilians, including as many as 200 children.
NATO members including the UK, Germany and Australia have been linked to providing the U.S. with intelligence used to carry out drone strikes.
The submission brought to the Court includes 13 case studies, UK-based charity Reprieve explained to Common Dreams, including that of Kareem Khan, a Pakistani anti-drone campaigner and journalist whose son and brother were killed in a 2009 drone attack.
Shahzad Akbar, lawyer for Kareem Khan and Director of legal charity the Foundation for Fundamental Rights, described him as "not only a victim, but an important voice for all other civilians killed and injured by US drone strikes."
Khan, who has sued the CIA over the drone attack, was abducted two weeks ago in Pakistan ahead of a planned meeting with members of the UK, German and Dutch Parliaments and testimony at the ICC. He was released after a week, during which time he said he was tortured and interrogated about his investigations of U.S. drone strikes.
"There can surely be no doubt that facilitating the deaths of thousands of civilians - as NATO allies are doing in a plethora of ways - constitutes war crimes," Kat Craig, Reprieve's legal director, said in a statement.
"The International Criminal Court, established specifically to hold overwhelming state power to account, is in a unique position to offer some semblance of justice to individual drone victims with nowhere else to go. They must take this complaint seriously and investigate," Craig stated.
___________________
The International Criminal Court has been urged to investigate possible war crimes committed by NATO member states for their role in aiding the U.S. drone war in Pakistan.
The Bureau of Investigative Journalism estimates that the hundreds of drone strikes the United States has launched on Pakistan since 2004 have killed 416-951 civilians, including as many as 200 children.
NATO members including the UK, Germany and Australia have been linked to providing the U.S. with intelligence used to carry out drone strikes.
The submission brought to the Court includes 13 case studies, UK-based charity Reprieve explained to Common Dreams, including that of Kareem Khan, a Pakistani anti-drone campaigner and journalist whose son and brother were killed in a 2009 drone attack.
Shahzad Akbar, lawyer for Kareem Khan and Director of legal charity the Foundation for Fundamental Rights, described him as "not only a victim, but an important voice for all other civilians killed and injured by US drone strikes."
Khan, who has sued the CIA over the drone attack, was abducted two weeks ago in Pakistan ahead of a planned meeting with members of the UK, German and Dutch Parliaments and testimony at the ICC. He was released after a week, during which time he said he was tortured and interrogated about his investigations of U.S. drone strikes.
"There can surely be no doubt that facilitating the deaths of thousands of civilians - as NATO allies are doing in a plethora of ways - constitutes war crimes," Kat Craig, Reprieve's legal director, said in a statement.
"The International Criminal Court, established specifically to hold overwhelming state power to account, is in a unique position to offer some semblance of justice to individual drone victims with nowhere else to go. They must take this complaint seriously and investigate," Craig stated.
___________________