Sen. Warren: Are We Making It Easier for Big Banks to Break the Law?
Warren questions whether current enforcement strategy is any deterrent at all
Where's the deterrent for stopping big banks from breaking the law?
That was the question posed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Thursday at the Senate Banking Committee Hearing, referencing the whopping raise recently given to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, whose Board of Directors awarded him the pay hike after the company spent billions to settle claims with the federal government over illegal conduct.
"Right now, if financial institutions can just settle their claims out of court, and get a raise for settling them, then where's the deterrent?" asked Warren.
"I think this raises questions about whether our enforcement strategy is working or whether it's actually so bad that we're making it more likely for big banks to break the law," Senator Warren said.
"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked.
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo responded by saying that "we'll have to see if the size of those fines acts as a deterrent," adding, "We are concerned with the healthy capitalization of the firm."
Warren noted that "the public has little confidence in regulators' willingness to seek the kind of penalties that will actually deter future financial crimes."
"Jamie Dimon himself said on CNBC a couple of weeks ago that JPMorgan could never afford a public trial," she said. "He said, I'm quoting here, 'Banks have a very tough time doing that. That would have been criminal for me to subject our company to.'"
This, Warren, said, should show regulators that if there's even a slight chance that regulators will take banks to trial, it will can have an impact on banks' behavior.
__________________
Urgent. It's never been this bad.
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission from the outset was simple. To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It’s never been this bad out there. And it’s never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed and doing some of its best and most important work, the threats we face are intensifying. Right now, with just four days to go in our Spring Campaign, we are not even halfway to our goal. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Can you make a gift right now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? There is no backup plan or rainy day fund. There is only you. —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Where's the deterrent for stopping big banks from breaking the law?
That was the question posed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Thursday at the Senate Banking Committee Hearing, referencing the whopping raise recently given to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, whose Board of Directors awarded him the pay hike after the company spent billions to settle claims with the federal government over illegal conduct.
"Right now, if financial institutions can just settle their claims out of court, and get a raise for settling them, then where's the deterrent?" asked Warren.
"I think this raises questions about whether our enforcement strategy is working or whether it's actually so bad that we're making it more likely for big banks to break the law," Senator Warren said.
"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked.
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo responded by saying that "we'll have to see if the size of those fines acts as a deterrent," adding, "We are concerned with the healthy capitalization of the firm."
Warren noted that "the public has little confidence in regulators' willingness to seek the kind of penalties that will actually deter future financial crimes."
"Jamie Dimon himself said on CNBC a couple of weeks ago that JPMorgan could never afford a public trial," she said. "He said, I'm quoting here, 'Banks have a very tough time doing that. That would have been criminal for me to subject our company to.'"
This, Warren, said, should show regulators that if there's even a slight chance that regulators will take banks to trial, it will can have an impact on banks' behavior.
__________________
Where's the deterrent for stopping big banks from breaking the law?
That was the question posed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Thursday at the Senate Banking Committee Hearing, referencing the whopping raise recently given to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, whose Board of Directors awarded him the pay hike after the company spent billions to settle claims with the federal government over illegal conduct.
"Right now, if financial institutions can just settle their claims out of court, and get a raise for settling them, then where's the deterrent?" asked Warren.
"I think this raises questions about whether our enforcement strategy is working or whether it's actually so bad that we're making it more likely for big banks to break the law," Senator Warren said.
"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked.
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo responded by saying that "we'll have to see if the size of those fines acts as a deterrent," adding, "We are concerned with the healthy capitalization of the firm."
Warren noted that "the public has little confidence in regulators' willingness to seek the kind of penalties that will actually deter future financial crimes."
"Jamie Dimon himself said on CNBC a couple of weeks ago that JPMorgan could never afford a public trial," she said. "He said, I'm quoting here, 'Banks have a very tough time doing that. That would have been criminal for me to subject our company to.'"
This, Warren, said, should show regulators that if there's even a slight chance that regulators will take banks to trial, it will can have an impact on banks' behavior.
__________________