"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked. (Screengrab)
Feb 06, 2014
Where's the deterrent for stopping big banks from breaking the law?
That was the question posed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Thursday at the Senate Banking Committee Hearing, referencing the whopping raise recently given to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, whose Board of Directors awarded him the pay hike after the company spent billions to settle claims with the federal government over illegal conduct.
"Right now, if financial institutions can just settle their claims out of court, and get a raise for settling them, then where's the deterrent?" asked Warren.
"I think this raises questions about whether our enforcement strategy is working or whether it's actually so bad that we're making it more likely for big banks to break the law," Senator Warren said.
"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked.
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo responded by saying that "we'll have to see if the size of those fines acts as a deterrent," adding, "We are concerned with the healthy capitalization of the firm."
Warren noted that "the public has little confidence in regulators' willingness to seek the kind of penalties that will actually deter future financial crimes."
"Jamie Dimon himself said on CNBC a couple of weeks ago that JPMorgan could never afford a public trial," she said. "He said, I'm quoting here, 'Banks have a very tough time doing that. That would have been criminal for me to subject our company to.'"
This, Warren, said, should show regulators that if there's even a slight chance that regulators will take banks to trial, it will can have an impact on banks' behavior.
__________________
Join Us: News for people demanding a better world
Common Dreams is powered by optimists who believe in the power of informed and engaged citizens to ignite and enact change to make the world a better place. We're hundreds of thousands strong, but every single supporter makes the difference. Your contribution supports this bold media model—free, independent, and dedicated to reporting the facts every day. Stand with us in the fight for economic equality, social justice, human rights, and a more sustainable future. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover the issues the corporate media never will. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
Where's the deterrent for stopping big banks from breaking the law?
That was the question posed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Thursday at the Senate Banking Committee Hearing, referencing the whopping raise recently given to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, whose Board of Directors awarded him the pay hike after the company spent billions to settle claims with the federal government over illegal conduct.
"Right now, if financial institutions can just settle their claims out of court, and get a raise for settling them, then where's the deterrent?" asked Warren.
"I think this raises questions about whether our enforcement strategy is working or whether it's actually so bad that we're making it more likely for big banks to break the law," Senator Warren said.
"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked.
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo responded by saying that "we'll have to see if the size of those fines acts as a deterrent," adding, "We are concerned with the healthy capitalization of the firm."
Warren noted that "the public has little confidence in regulators' willingness to seek the kind of penalties that will actually deter future financial crimes."
"Jamie Dimon himself said on CNBC a couple of weeks ago that JPMorgan could never afford a public trial," she said. "He said, I'm quoting here, 'Banks have a very tough time doing that. That would have been criminal for me to subject our company to.'"
This, Warren, said, should show regulators that if there's even a slight chance that regulators will take banks to trial, it will can have an impact on banks' behavior.
__________________
Where's the deterrent for stopping big banks from breaking the law?
That was the question posed by Senator Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) Thursday at the Senate Banking Committee Hearing, referencing the whopping raise recently given to Jamie Dimon, CEO of JPMorgan, whose Board of Directors awarded him the pay hike after the company spent billions to settle claims with the federal government over illegal conduct.
"Right now, if financial institutions can just settle their claims out of court, and get a raise for settling them, then where's the deterrent?" asked Warren.
"I think this raises questions about whether our enforcement strategy is working or whether it's actually so bad that we're making it more likely for big banks to break the law," Senator Warren said.
"Does anyone on this panel seriously think that the government's enforcement system for financial crimes is actually working in the sense of deterring future lawbreaking?" Warren asked.
U.S. Federal Reserve Governor Daniel Tarullo responded by saying that "we'll have to see if the size of those fines acts as a deterrent," adding, "We are concerned with the healthy capitalization of the firm."
Warren noted that "the public has little confidence in regulators' willingness to seek the kind of penalties that will actually deter future financial crimes."
"Jamie Dimon himself said on CNBC a couple of weeks ago that JPMorgan could never afford a public trial," she said. "He said, I'm quoting here, 'Banks have a very tough time doing that. That would have been criminal for me to subject our company to.'"
This, Warren, said, should show regulators that if there's even a slight chance that regulators will take banks to trial, it will can have an impact on banks' behavior.
__________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.