

SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.


Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.

This is according to a national survey by the Pew Research Center and USA TODAY, conducted in the days immediately following Obama's speech and published Monday.

The poll, which surveyed 1,504 adults, found that 53% disapprove of the U.S. government's surveillance of telephone and internet data, while just 40% approve. This is a marked shift from July, when more than 50% said they approved and only 44% said they disapprove.
While approval rates among Democrats are slightly higher than those of Republicans, overall disapproval has increased across party lines.
The fall in support is most steep with respondents identified as African-American and Hispanic.
Almost half of those surveyed said the limits on the government's ability to collect telephone and internet data are inadequate.
Obama's much-vaunted speech on NSA reforms last Friday failed to buck this trend.
Half of those surveyed said they didn't even know about his proposed reforms, and of those who had, 73% said the proposed reforms will make "no difference" to "protections on people's privacy."
Of people aged 18-29, 57% say Snowdens revelations "served public interest" while just 35% said they caused harm. Yet, the overall public showed a near-even split on this question, with a slight majority among those who believe the revelations had a positive effect.
Meanwhile, 56% support government pursuit of a criminal case against Snowden, while 32% oppose it, with support for prosecution lowest among young respondents.
Yet, many charge that the poll shows the importance of Snowden's whistleblowing. "The poll is a very strong vindication of Edward Snowden," writes John Walker for Firedoglake. He believed the American people wouldn't approve if they knew the truth about the NSA and now that they do know they don't approve."
_____________________
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |

This is according to a national survey by the Pew Research Center and USA TODAY, conducted in the days immediately following Obama's speech and published Monday.

The poll, which surveyed 1,504 adults, found that 53% disapprove of the U.S. government's surveillance of telephone and internet data, while just 40% approve. This is a marked shift from July, when more than 50% said they approved and only 44% said they disapprove.
While approval rates among Democrats are slightly higher than those of Republicans, overall disapproval has increased across party lines.
The fall in support is most steep with respondents identified as African-American and Hispanic.
Almost half of those surveyed said the limits on the government's ability to collect telephone and internet data are inadequate.
Obama's much-vaunted speech on NSA reforms last Friday failed to buck this trend.
Half of those surveyed said they didn't even know about his proposed reforms, and of those who had, 73% said the proposed reforms will make "no difference" to "protections on people's privacy."
Of people aged 18-29, 57% say Snowdens revelations "served public interest" while just 35% said they caused harm. Yet, the overall public showed a near-even split on this question, with a slight majority among those who believe the revelations had a positive effect.
Meanwhile, 56% support government pursuit of a criminal case against Snowden, while 32% oppose it, with support for prosecution lowest among young respondents.
Yet, many charge that the poll shows the importance of Snowden's whistleblowing. "The poll is a very strong vindication of Edward Snowden," writes John Walker for Firedoglake. He believed the American people wouldn't approve if they knew the truth about the NSA and now that they do know they don't approve."
_____________________

This is according to a national survey by the Pew Research Center and USA TODAY, conducted in the days immediately following Obama's speech and published Monday.

The poll, which surveyed 1,504 adults, found that 53% disapprove of the U.S. government's surveillance of telephone and internet data, while just 40% approve. This is a marked shift from July, when more than 50% said they approved and only 44% said they disapprove.
While approval rates among Democrats are slightly higher than those of Republicans, overall disapproval has increased across party lines.
The fall in support is most steep with respondents identified as African-American and Hispanic.
Almost half of those surveyed said the limits on the government's ability to collect telephone and internet data are inadequate.
Obama's much-vaunted speech on NSA reforms last Friday failed to buck this trend.
Half of those surveyed said they didn't even know about his proposed reforms, and of those who had, 73% said the proposed reforms will make "no difference" to "protections on people's privacy."
Of people aged 18-29, 57% say Snowdens revelations "served public interest" while just 35% said they caused harm. Yet, the overall public showed a near-even split on this question, with a slight majority among those who believe the revelations had a positive effect.
Meanwhile, 56% support government pursuit of a criminal case against Snowden, while 32% oppose it, with support for prosecution lowest among young respondents.
Yet, many charge that the poll shows the importance of Snowden's whistleblowing. "The poll is a very strong vindication of Edward Snowden," writes John Walker for Firedoglake. He believed the American people wouldn't approve if they knew the truth about the NSA and now that they do know they don't approve."
_____________________