Neurotoxic "Bull's-Eye" Surrounds Canadian Tar Sands: Scientists
Concentric circles of mercury and other toxic materials cover over 7,300 square miles

The group of researchers from Environment Canada presented their report, "Current and Long-term Trends in Atmospheric Deposition of Inorganic Contaminants and Methyl Mercury to the Alberta Oil Sands Region," at a recent toxicology conference in Nashville, Canada's Postmedia News reports.
The report, which has not yet been published, reveals a "bull's-eye" ring of the neurotoxin encompassing over 7,300 square miles around the tar sands site.
The scientists said levels decreased in samples the further they got from the tar sands site.
"The scientists say much research remains to be done on the mercury around the oilsands," Postmedia reports, "but there are indications the toxin is building up in some of the region's wildlife."
Researcher Jane Kirk, who presented the findings, said in an interview with Postmedia that mercury is "the number one concern" of toxins generated by tar sands excavation to date.
"Here we have a direct source of methyl mercury being emitted in this region and deposited to the landscapes and water bodies," Kirk said of samples the team took from snow and spring snow-melt. "So come snow-melt that methyl mercury is now going to enter lakes and rivers where potentially it could be taken up directly by organisms and then bioaccumulated and biomagnified though food webs."
And Postmedia adds:
Kirk's team has also found mercury and a long list of other priority pollutants on the bottom of five remote, seemingly undisturbed lakes located 10 to 50 kilometers from the oilsands, confirming findings of a related study last year.
Local indigenous and environmental groups have been engaged in a growing protest movement against the tar sands development in Alberta as well as continued plans by the Canadian government and tar sands industry to transport the corrosive fossil fuel via pipeline for export.
A Canadian governmental review panel recently approved a proposal from energy giant Enbridge for the controversial Northern Gateway tar sands pipeline, which protesters say will bring inevitable oil spills to pristine habitats and illegally encroach on First Nations' lands.
_______________________
An Urgent Message From Our Co-Founder
Dear Common Dreams reader, It’s been nearly 30 years since I co-founded Common Dreams with my late wife, Lina Newhouser. We had the radical notion that journalism should serve the public good, not corporate profits. It was clear to us from the outset what it would take to build such a project. No paid advertisements. No corporate sponsors. No millionaire publisher telling us what to think or do. Many people said we wouldn't last a year, but we proved those doubters wrong. Together with a tremendous team of journalists and dedicated staff, we built an independent media outlet free from the constraints of profits and corporate control. Our mission has always been simple: To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. Building Common Dreams was not easy. Our survival was never guaranteed. When you take on the most powerful forces—Wall Street greed, fossil fuel industry destruction, Big Tech lobbyists, and uber-rich oligarchs who have spent billions upon billions rigging the economy and democracy in their favor—the only bulwark you have is supporters who believe in your work. But here’s the urgent message from me today. It's never been this bad out there. And it's never been this hard to keep us going. At the very moment Common Dreams is most needed, the threats we face are intensifying. We need your support now more than ever. We don't accept corporate advertising and never will. We don't have a paywall because we don't think people should be blocked from critical news based on their ability to pay. Everything we do is funded by the donations of readers like you. When everyone does the little they can afford, we are strong. But if that support retreats or dries up, so do we. Will you donate now to make sure Common Dreams not only survives but thrives? —Craig Brown, Co-founder |
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

The group of researchers from Environment Canada presented their report, "Current and Long-term Trends in Atmospheric Deposition of Inorganic Contaminants and Methyl Mercury to the Alberta Oil Sands Region," at a recent toxicology conference in Nashville, Canada's Postmedia News reports.
The report, which has not yet been published, reveals a "bull's-eye" ring of the neurotoxin encompassing over 7,300 square miles around the tar sands site.
The scientists said levels decreased in samples the further they got from the tar sands site.
"The scientists say much research remains to be done on the mercury around the oilsands," Postmedia reports, "but there are indications the toxin is building up in some of the region's wildlife."
Researcher Jane Kirk, who presented the findings, said in an interview with Postmedia that mercury is "the number one concern" of toxins generated by tar sands excavation to date.
"Here we have a direct source of methyl mercury being emitted in this region and deposited to the landscapes and water bodies," Kirk said of samples the team took from snow and spring snow-melt. "So come snow-melt that methyl mercury is now going to enter lakes and rivers where potentially it could be taken up directly by organisms and then bioaccumulated and biomagnified though food webs."
And Postmedia adds:
Kirk's team has also found mercury and a long list of other priority pollutants on the bottom of five remote, seemingly undisturbed lakes located 10 to 50 kilometers from the oilsands, confirming findings of a related study last year.
Local indigenous and environmental groups have been engaged in a growing protest movement against the tar sands development in Alberta as well as continued plans by the Canadian government and tar sands industry to transport the corrosive fossil fuel via pipeline for export.
A Canadian governmental review panel recently approved a proposal from energy giant Enbridge for the controversial Northern Gateway tar sands pipeline, which protesters say will bring inevitable oil spills to pristine habitats and illegally encroach on First Nations' lands.
_______________________
Jacob Chamberlain is a former staff writer for Common Dreams. He is the author of Migrant Justice in the Age of Removal. His website is www.jacobpchamberlain.com.

The group of researchers from Environment Canada presented their report, "Current and Long-term Trends in Atmospheric Deposition of Inorganic Contaminants and Methyl Mercury to the Alberta Oil Sands Region," at a recent toxicology conference in Nashville, Canada's Postmedia News reports.
The report, which has not yet been published, reveals a "bull's-eye" ring of the neurotoxin encompassing over 7,300 square miles around the tar sands site.
The scientists said levels decreased in samples the further they got from the tar sands site.
"The scientists say much research remains to be done on the mercury around the oilsands," Postmedia reports, "but there are indications the toxin is building up in some of the region's wildlife."
Researcher Jane Kirk, who presented the findings, said in an interview with Postmedia that mercury is "the number one concern" of toxins generated by tar sands excavation to date.
"Here we have a direct source of methyl mercury being emitted in this region and deposited to the landscapes and water bodies," Kirk said of samples the team took from snow and spring snow-melt. "So come snow-melt that methyl mercury is now going to enter lakes and rivers where potentially it could be taken up directly by organisms and then bioaccumulated and biomagnified though food webs."
And Postmedia adds:
Kirk's team has also found mercury and a long list of other priority pollutants on the bottom of five remote, seemingly undisturbed lakes located 10 to 50 kilometers from the oilsands, confirming findings of a related study last year.
Local indigenous and environmental groups have been engaged in a growing protest movement against the tar sands development in Alberta as well as continued plans by the Canadian government and tar sands industry to transport the corrosive fossil fuel via pipeline for export.
A Canadian governmental review panel recently approved a proposal from energy giant Enbridge for the controversial Northern Gateway tar sands pipeline, which protesters say will bring inevitable oil spills to pristine habitats and illegally encroach on First Nations' lands.
_______________________

