SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
Following a flood of corporate cash in a campaign against a Swiss referendum that would have limited CEO pay in the country, the referendum, which had gained international attention for its critique of vast income inequality, https://www.nytimes.com/2013/11/25/business/swiss-reject-measure-to
The "1:12 Initiative for Fair Play" would have limited the income of high earning CEOs to no more than 12 times more than the lowest-paid employees at their companies.
The group who spearheaded the initiative, the youth wing of Switzerland's Socialist Party (JUSO), had gained mass support in the early part of their campaign until big money donations to the 'no' vote camp started pouring in, toppling 'yes' vote spending by up to 50 times the amount.
The rush of money worked. 65% voted against the referendum Sunday, as opposed to the 46% who were against it from the start, according to estimates by Gfs.bern, a Swiss polling firm.
However, "Although the referendum was defeated," The New York Times reports, "voter dismay at the behavior of some Swiss corporations and executives is widespread."
The Times reports:
Proponents of the initiative complained that companies like the Swiss banking giant UBS, which received a government bailout because of the financial crisis, continued to pay huge executive bonuses even when they performed poorly.
Supporters of the 1:12 initiative conceded defeat Sunday but said they had succeeded in raising public awareness about the issue.
"In the future, C.E.O.'s and boards of directors are going to have to think very carefully about how they justify multimillion-franc compensation," the Swiss Social Democratic Party, which had supported the initiative, said.
_______________________
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
The "1:12 Initiative for Fair Play" would have limited the income of high earning CEOs to no more than 12 times more than the lowest-paid employees at their companies.
The group who spearheaded the initiative, the youth wing of Switzerland's Socialist Party (JUSO), had gained mass support in the early part of their campaign until big money donations to the 'no' vote camp started pouring in, toppling 'yes' vote spending by up to 50 times the amount.
The rush of money worked. 65% voted against the referendum Sunday, as opposed to the 46% who were against it from the start, according to estimates by Gfs.bern, a Swiss polling firm.
However, "Although the referendum was defeated," The New York Times reports, "voter dismay at the behavior of some Swiss corporations and executives is widespread."
The Times reports:
Proponents of the initiative complained that companies like the Swiss banking giant UBS, which received a government bailout because of the financial crisis, continued to pay huge executive bonuses even when they performed poorly.
Supporters of the 1:12 initiative conceded defeat Sunday but said they had succeeded in raising public awareness about the issue.
"In the future, C.E.O.'s and boards of directors are going to have to think very carefully about how they justify multimillion-franc compensation," the Swiss Social Democratic Party, which had supported the initiative, said.
_______________________
The "1:12 Initiative for Fair Play" would have limited the income of high earning CEOs to no more than 12 times more than the lowest-paid employees at their companies.
The group who spearheaded the initiative, the youth wing of Switzerland's Socialist Party (JUSO), had gained mass support in the early part of their campaign until big money donations to the 'no' vote camp started pouring in, toppling 'yes' vote spending by up to 50 times the amount.
The rush of money worked. 65% voted against the referendum Sunday, as opposed to the 46% who were against it from the start, according to estimates by Gfs.bern, a Swiss polling firm.
However, "Although the referendum was defeated," The New York Times reports, "voter dismay at the behavior of some Swiss corporations and executives is widespread."
The Times reports:
Proponents of the initiative complained that companies like the Swiss banking giant UBS, which received a government bailout because of the financial crisis, continued to pay huge executive bonuses even when they performed poorly.
Supporters of the 1:12 initiative conceded defeat Sunday but said they had succeeded in raising public awareness about the issue.
"In the future, C.E.O.'s and boards of directors are going to have to think very carefully about how they justify multimillion-franc compensation," the Swiss Social Democratic Party, which had supported the initiative, said.
_______________________