SUBSCRIBE TO OUR FREE NEWSLETTER
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
5
#000000
#FFFFFF
To donate by check, phone, or other method, see our More Ways to Give page.
Daily news & progressive opinion—funded by the people, not the corporations—delivered straight to your inbox.
The NSA unconstitutionally collected as many as 56,000 e-mails and other electronic communications of people in the U.S. for several years, according to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ruling made public on Wednesday.
"The court is troubled that the government's revelations regarding N.S.A.'s acquisition of Internet transactions mark the third instance in less than three years in which the government has disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of a major collection program," Bates wrote in his 85-page opinion.
The collection of data from Americans began in 2008, and was ruled unconstitutional by the FISA court when it found out about it in 2011.
A unnamed senior intelligence official downplayed the revelations, saying it was not "an egregious overreaching" but merely a "technological problem that resulted in an inadvertent collection of a relatively small number of U.S. person communications."
"These opinions indicate that the NSA misrepresented its activities to the court just as it misrepresented them to Congress and the public, and they provide further evidence that current oversight mechanisms are far too feeble," stated Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director.
"More fundamentally," Jaffer continued, "the documents serve as a reminder of how incredibly permissive our surveillance laws are, allowing the NSA to conduct wholesale surveillance of Americans' communications under the banner of foreign intelligence collection. This kind of surveillance is unconstitutional, and Americans should make it very clear to their representatives that they will not tolerate it."
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said the declassification of the document was "long overdue."
"The ruling states that the NSA has knowingly acquired tens of thousands of wholly domestic communications under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, even though this law was specifically written to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of wholly domestic communications," Wyden added.
Therefore, Wyden stated, FISA Section 702 offers no safeguard for Americans' civil liberties and privacy.
____________________
Political revenge. Mass deportations. Project 2025. Unfathomable corruption. Attacks on Social Security, Medicare, and Medicaid. Pardons for insurrectionists. An all-out assault on democracy. Republicans in Congress are scrambling to give Trump broad new powers to strip the tax-exempt status of any nonprofit he doesn’t like by declaring it a “terrorist-supporting organization.” Trump has already begun filing lawsuits against news outlets that criticize him. At Common Dreams, we won’t back down, but we must get ready for whatever Trump and his thugs throw at us. Our Year-End campaign is our most important fundraiser of the year. As a people-powered nonprofit news outlet, we cover issues the corporate media never will, but we can only continue with our readers’ support. By donating today, please help us fight the dangers of a second Trump presidency. |
The NSA unconstitutionally collected as many as 56,000 e-mails and other electronic communications of people in the U.S. for several years, according to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ruling made public on Wednesday.
"The court is troubled that the government's revelations regarding N.S.A.'s acquisition of Internet transactions mark the third instance in less than three years in which the government has disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of a major collection program," Bates wrote in his 85-page opinion.
The collection of data from Americans began in 2008, and was ruled unconstitutional by the FISA court when it found out about it in 2011.
A unnamed senior intelligence official downplayed the revelations, saying it was not "an egregious overreaching" but merely a "technological problem that resulted in an inadvertent collection of a relatively small number of U.S. person communications."
"These opinions indicate that the NSA misrepresented its activities to the court just as it misrepresented them to Congress and the public, and they provide further evidence that current oversight mechanisms are far too feeble," stated Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director.
"More fundamentally," Jaffer continued, "the documents serve as a reminder of how incredibly permissive our surveillance laws are, allowing the NSA to conduct wholesale surveillance of Americans' communications under the banner of foreign intelligence collection. This kind of surveillance is unconstitutional, and Americans should make it very clear to their representatives that they will not tolerate it."
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said the declassification of the document was "long overdue."
"The ruling states that the NSA has knowingly acquired tens of thousands of wholly domestic communications under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, even though this law was specifically written to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of wholly domestic communications," Wyden added.
Therefore, Wyden stated, FISA Section 702 offers no safeguard for Americans' civil liberties and privacy.
____________________
The NSA unconstitutionally collected as many as 56,000 e-mails and other electronic communications of people in the U.S. for several years, according to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ruling made public on Wednesday.
"The court is troubled that the government's revelations regarding N.S.A.'s acquisition of Internet transactions mark the third instance in less than three years in which the government has disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of a major collection program," Bates wrote in his 85-page opinion.
The collection of data from Americans began in 2008, and was ruled unconstitutional by the FISA court when it found out about it in 2011.
A unnamed senior intelligence official downplayed the revelations, saying it was not "an egregious overreaching" but merely a "technological problem that resulted in an inadvertent collection of a relatively small number of U.S. person communications."
"These opinions indicate that the NSA misrepresented its activities to the court just as it misrepresented them to Congress and the public, and they provide further evidence that current oversight mechanisms are far too feeble," stated Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director.
"More fundamentally," Jaffer continued, "the documents serve as a reminder of how incredibly permissive our surveillance laws are, allowing the NSA to conduct wholesale surveillance of Americans' communications under the banner of foreign intelligence collection. This kind of surveillance is unconstitutional, and Americans should make it very clear to their representatives that they will not tolerate it."
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said the declassification of the document was "long overdue."
"The ruling states that the NSA has knowingly acquired tens of thousands of wholly domestic communications under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, even though this law was specifically written to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of wholly domestic communications," Wyden added.
Therefore, Wyden stated, FISA Section 702 offers no safeguard for Americans' civil liberties and privacy.
____________________