Aug 22, 2013
The NSA unconstitutionally collected as many as 56,000 e-mails and other electronic communications of people in the U.S. for several years, according to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ruling made public on Wednesday.
"The court is troubled that the government's revelations regarding N.S.A.'s acquisition of Internet transactions mark the third instance in less than three years in which the government has disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of a major collection program," Bates wrote in his 85-page opinion.
The collection of data from Americans began in 2008, and was ruled unconstitutional by the FISA court when it found out about it in 2011.
A unnamed senior intelligence official downplayed the revelations, saying it was not "an egregious overreaching" but merely a "technological problem that resulted in an inadvertent collection of a relatively small number of U.S. person communications."
"These opinions indicate that the NSA misrepresented its activities to the court just as it misrepresented them to Congress and the public, and they provide further evidence that current oversight mechanisms are far too feeble," stated Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director.
"More fundamentally," Jaffer continued, "the documents serve as a reminder of how incredibly permissive our surveillance laws are, allowing the NSA to conduct wholesale surveillance of Americans' communications under the banner of foreign intelligence collection. This kind of surveillance is unconstitutional, and Americans should make it very clear to their representatives that they will not tolerate it."
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said the declassification of the document was "long overdue."
"The ruling states that the NSA has knowingly acquired tens of thousands of wholly domestic communications under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, even though this law was specifically written to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of wholly domestic communications," Wyden added.
Therefore, Wyden stated, FISA Section 702 offers no safeguard for Americans' civil liberties and privacy.
____________________
Why Your Ongoing Support Is Essential
Donald Trump’s attacks on democracy, justice, and a free press are escalating — putting everything we stand for at risk. We believe a better world is possible, but we can’t get there without your support. Common Dreams stands apart. We answer only to you — our readers, activists, and changemakers — not to billionaires or corporations. Our independence allows us to cover the vital stories that others won’t, spotlighting movements for peace, equality, and human rights. Right now, our work faces unprecedented challenges. Misinformation is spreading, journalists are under attack, and financial pressures are mounting. As a reader-supported, nonprofit newsroom, your support is crucial to keep this journalism alive. Whatever you can give — $10, $25, or $100 — helps us stay strong and responsive when the world needs us most. Together, we’ll continue to build the independent, courageous journalism our movement relies on. Thank you for being part of this community. |
Our work is licensed under Creative Commons (CC BY-NC-ND 3.0). Feel free to republish and share widely.
The NSA unconstitutionally collected as many as 56,000 e-mails and other electronic communications of people in the U.S. for several years, according to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ruling made public on Wednesday.
"The court is troubled that the government's revelations regarding N.S.A.'s acquisition of Internet transactions mark the third instance in less than three years in which the government has disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of a major collection program," Bates wrote in his 85-page opinion.
The collection of data from Americans began in 2008, and was ruled unconstitutional by the FISA court when it found out about it in 2011.
A unnamed senior intelligence official downplayed the revelations, saying it was not "an egregious overreaching" but merely a "technological problem that resulted in an inadvertent collection of a relatively small number of U.S. person communications."
"These opinions indicate that the NSA misrepresented its activities to the court just as it misrepresented them to Congress and the public, and they provide further evidence that current oversight mechanisms are far too feeble," stated Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director.
"More fundamentally," Jaffer continued, "the documents serve as a reminder of how incredibly permissive our surveillance laws are, allowing the NSA to conduct wholesale surveillance of Americans' communications under the banner of foreign intelligence collection. This kind of surveillance is unconstitutional, and Americans should make it very clear to their representatives that they will not tolerate it."
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said the declassification of the document was "long overdue."
"The ruling states that the NSA has knowingly acquired tens of thousands of wholly domestic communications under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, even though this law was specifically written to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of wholly domestic communications," Wyden added.
Therefore, Wyden stated, FISA Section 702 offers no safeguard for Americans' civil liberties and privacy.
____________________
The NSA unconstitutionally collected as many as 56,000 e-mails and other electronic communications of people in the U.S. for several years, according to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Court (FISC) ruling made public on Wednesday.
"The court is troubled that the government's revelations regarding N.S.A.'s acquisition of Internet transactions mark the third instance in less than three years in which the government has disclosed a substantial misrepresentation regarding the scope of a major collection program," Bates wrote in his 85-page opinion.
The collection of data from Americans began in 2008, and was ruled unconstitutional by the FISA court when it found out about it in 2011.
A unnamed senior intelligence official downplayed the revelations, saying it was not "an egregious overreaching" but merely a "technological problem that resulted in an inadvertent collection of a relatively small number of U.S. person communications."
"These opinions indicate that the NSA misrepresented its activities to the court just as it misrepresented them to Congress and the public, and they provide further evidence that current oversight mechanisms are far too feeble," stated Jameel Jaffer, American Civil Liberties Union deputy legal director.
"More fundamentally," Jaffer continued, "the documents serve as a reminder of how incredibly permissive our surveillance laws are, allowing the NSA to conduct wholesale surveillance of Americans' communications under the banner of foreign intelligence collection. This kind of surveillance is unconstitutional, and Americans should make it very clear to their representatives that they will not tolerate it."
Senator Ron Wyden (D-Ore.) said the declassification of the document was "long overdue."
"The ruling states that the NSA has knowingly acquired tens of thousands of wholly domestic communications under section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act, even though this law was specifically written to prohibit the warrantless acquisition of wholly domestic communications," Wyden added.
Therefore, Wyden stated, FISA Section 702 offers no safeguard for Americans' civil liberties and privacy.
____________________
We've had enough. The 1% own and operate the corporate media. They are doing everything they can to defend the status quo, squash dissent and protect the wealthy and the powerful. The Common Dreams media model is different. We cover the news that matters to the 99%. Our mission? To inform. To inspire. To ignite change for the common good. How? Nonprofit. Independent. Reader-supported. Free to read. Free to republish. Free to share. With no advertising. No paywalls. No selling of your data. Thousands of small donations fund our newsroom and allow us to continue publishing. Can you chip in? We can't do it without you. Thank you.